The End of Cowboy Diplomacy

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Adam's Apple, Jul 16, 2006.

  1. Adam's Apple
    Offline

    Adam's Apple Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,092
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +447
    Casting some facts on Time Magazine's thesis: "The End of Cowboy Diplomacy". Long article (7 pages) but worth the read.

    Time's Unserious and Misleading Cover Story
    By Peter Wehner, Real Clear Politics
    July 14, 2006

    1. The Time article asserts that our actions in Iraq have "emboldened" the rulers in Tehran and Pyongyang to obtain nuclear weapons. The implication is that North Korea and Iran would have taken a different path if the Iraq war had never happened.

    This argument is contradicted by history. In 2003, the IAEA reported that "Iran has now acknowledged that it has been developing, for 18 years, a uranium centrifuge program, and, for 12 years, a laser enrichment program." In other words, Iran's secret nuclear weapons program predated the war in Iraq by nearly two decades. The IAEA also reported that Iran had produced small amounts of plutonium, generally only associated with nuclear weapons programs, between 1988 and 1992. The programs were secret and only came to light after the uranium enrichment program was exposed by an Iranian opposition group in 2002.

    On October 17, 2002, The Washington Post reported "The North Korean government has acknowledged for the first time that it has been secretly developing nuclear weapons for years in violation of international agreements." In December 2002, North Korea expelled IAEA inspectors, removed UN monitoring equipment, and announced that it would restart work at its nuclear reactors and reopen a plutonium processing facility. In January of 2003, North Korea announced that it was quitting the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In February 2003, North Korea restarted a reactor at its primary nuclear complex.

    All of these provocations occurred prior to a shot being fired in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    2. According to Time, the evidence that the Bush Administration is seeing a "strategic makeover" is that the President is now, at long last, "join[ing] multilateral negotiations aimed at defusing the standoffs with North Korea and Iran."

    In fact, the United States, China, and North Korea held trilateral talks in Beijing in April 2003 and have had a six-party talks framework in place ever since the summer of 2003. Senator Kerry even campaigned against President Bush in 2004 on the charge that this Administration was excessively multilateralist in its approach to North Korea.

    With respect to Iran, it is true the United States agreed to join the EU-3 at the negotiating table earlier this year - but we have been providing coordination, input, and support for the last several years. Throughout the campaign, Senator Kerry once again made the charge that the Bush Administration was relying too much on multilateralism.

    The notion that multilateral negotiations is something new with respect to North Korea and Iran is simply false.

    for full article:
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/07/times_unserious_and_misleading.html
     
  2. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572

    Another example of the liberal media reporting what they WANT to happen, and not WHAT happened.
     
  3. KarlMarx
    Offline

    KarlMarx Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    ...
    Ratings:
    +490
    Should be more like the spread of cowboy diplomacy....

    Japan has made clear to North Korea, in no uncertain terms, that it will use pre-emptive military action to ensure its national security.

    The Japanese Prime Minister has learned a trick or two from GWB.

    P.S. Too bad we couldn't flatten North Korea simply on the grounds that its leader is an a$$hole.
     
  4. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572

    I love how Israel is responding to continued terrorist attacks.

    They have learned you cannot reason, talk to, or make nice to people who want to kill you
     
  5. Adam's Apple
    Offline

    Adam's Apple Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,092
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +447
    Too bad other countries have not learned that simple lesson from Israel's experience. It would be so much easier than having to learn it directly through personal experience. But the pacifist bunch will just keep on trying to reason/talk/make nice/placate...while the terrorists will benefit and make use of everything they want to give--and keep right on killing without provocation.
     

Share This Page