The Dems' Desperation To Rewrite History

[The Rabbi]

This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.

Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine

Too funny by half.

View attachment 32421

What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?

Of course he was a Democrat.. Geezez.

What ideology was he Stephanie?

Liberal or Conservative?

Wallace was a progressive.
/oops.

 

[Dot Com]

Too funny by half.

"Too funny by half" is right. All of those people started voting Repub right after the passage of The Voting Rights Act waaay back in 1965.

 

[paperview]

This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.

Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine

Too funny by half.

View attachment 32421

What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?

Of course he was a Democrat.. Geezez.

What ideology was he Stephanie?

Liberal or Conservative?

Wallace was a progressive.
/oops.

Let's have a listen to that "progressive" democrat, George Wallace :

"Never before in the history of this nation have so many human and property rights been destroyed by a single enactment of the Congress. It is an act of tyranny. It is the assassin's knife stuck in the back of liberty.

With this assassin's knife and a blackjack in the hand of the Federal force-cult, the left-wing liberals will try to force us back into bondage. Bondage to a tyranny more brutal than that imposed by the British monarchy which claimed power to rule over the lives of our forefathers under sanction of the Divine Right of kings.

Today, this tyranny is imposed by the central government which claims the right to rule over our lives under sanction of the omnipotent black-robed despots who sit on the bench of the United States Supreme Court.

...Yet there are those who call this a good bill. It is people like Senator Hubert Humphrey (Democrat) and other members of Americans for Democratic Action. It is people like Ralph McGill and other left-wing radical apologists.They called it a good bill before it was amended to restore the right to trial by jury in certain cases.

It was left-wing radicals who led the fight in the Senate for the so-called civil rights bill now about to enslave our nation
...
You and I know that that's extremely difficult to do where our newspapers are owned by out-of-state interests. Newspapers which are run and operated by left-wing liberals, Communist sympathizers, and members of the Americans for Democratic Action and other Communist front organizations with high sounding names.

However, we will not be intimidated by the vultures of the liberal left-wing press. We will not be deceived by their lies and distortions of truth. We will not be swayed by their brutal attacks upon the character and reputation of any honest citizen who dares stand up and fight for liberty.
...
It is perfectly obvious from the left-wing liberal press and from the left-wing law journals that what the court is saying behind all the jargon is that they don't like our form of government.

...
I am a conservative." - George Wallace

LINK

There's more rich red-meat for your there, connies. You'd love it. That was his July 4th "patriotic" American speech, where he decries the Civil Rights Act.

The whole speech sounds like it was plucked straight from a Tea party rally, save a few words here or there.

Progressive....in your dreams. Ha!

Ooops.

 

[The Rabbi]

Wallace was elected by a majority of blacks for his last term of governor. He won by increasing taxation and governmenet funding for schools and other projects. i.e. once you strip out the racial stuff, Wallace was a progressive and a populist.
It's a shame that US schools have produced someone as ignorant as you are of basic elemental facts.

 

[chikenwing]

The article, btw, is brilliant,

mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

"The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party."

That summarized it perfectly from OnePercenter's link.

So you have a comprehensive list of all the converts,say people like Bird and Wallace that switched parties??

Repeating something over and over that is not true will never be true,no matter what.

 

[jasonnfree]

My morning fix. Republicans still trying to convince the world that they are the real freedom lovers and friends of minorities. The posts one these forums dripping with hatred towards minorities and blacks that aren't walter williams clones are good evidence of the opposite feelings of republicans. All the efforts to stop early voting in places like Ohio, more evidence. The scorn towards blacks in Detroit that now can't pay their water bills. The blaming of people on welfare and other safety nets as the cause for America's economic woes and not one word about the freebies corporate america and the very wealthy get. Nice try repubs, but it appears the blacks and many ordinary working people aren't buying the crap you're peddling.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The article, btw, is brilliant,

mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

The left tries to take credit for anything they think is good. Not surprising when you consider so much of what they actually do turns out badly. I can understand that they started to love blacks under LBJ, of course he used a different name then blacks for them. But it is beyond my understanding of how the democrats can not apologize for the sins of their past and blacks call themselves democrats.

It isn't 'their' past. Those Democrats are dead

Oh yes, using semantics makes the past of the democrat party oh so better.
You know full well why the democrat party doesn't apologize, because if they do then they admit it happened and they own it. By not doing the manly thing and taking responsibility they hope to switch responsibility to the Republicans. Which admittedly they have done very well.

Time for blacks to wake up.

Conservatives here at USMB prove THEY own almost every day. Almost every day conservatives here say that businesses should have the right to discriminate based on color.

 

[paperview]

Wallace was elected by a majority of blacks for his last term of governor. He won by increasing taxation and governmenet funding for schools and other projects. i.e. once you strip out the racial stuff, Wallace was a progressive and a populist.
It's a shame that US schools have produced someone as ignorant as you are of basic elemental facts.

His last term as Governor ended in 1987.

In between that time he lost a bid at the 1968 president election under the American Independent Party ticket (because he couldn't run as a Democrat at this point) -- with a platform of segregation (and carried five southern states)

and was four year later put in a wheelchair by an attempted assassination. This gave him ...pause.

He later, as we know, came to his senses, apologized, and sought forgiveness. There was a whole lot that came between the Wallace of the 1950's 60's ----------- and the Wallace of the later 70's and 80's.

So don't even try buddy. Don't even try.

Idiot.

 

[The Rabbi]

My morning fix. Republicans still trying to convince the world that they are the real freedom lovers and friends of minorities. The posts one these forums dripping with hatred towards minorities and blacks that aren't walter williams clones are good evidence of the opposite feelings of republicans. All the efforts to stop early voting in places like Ohio, more evidence. The scorn towards blacks in Detroit that now can't pay their water bills. The blaming of people on welfare and other safety nets as the cause for America's economic woes and not one word about the freebies corporate america and the very wealthy get. Nice try repubs, but it appears the blacks and many ordinary working people aren't buying the crap you're peddling.

What you actually see is disgust with racial pandering that has kept people dependent with an entitlement mentality. Yes, there is scorn towards people who think they are entitled to free shit merely because they are breathing. Something you may not get.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'd like to hear which parts of the article were in fact historically inaccurate.

Give us a list.

 

[Stephanie]

My morning fix. Republicans still trying to convince the world that they are the real freedom lovers and friends of minorities. The posts one these forums dripping with hatred towards minorities and blacks that aren't walter williams clones are good evidence of the opposite feelings of republicans. All the efforts to stop early voting in places like Ohio, more evidence. The scorn towards blacks in Detroit that now can't pay their water bills. The blaming of people on welfare and other safety nets as the cause for America's economic woes and not one word about the freebies corporate america and the very wealthy get. Nice try repubs, but it appears the blacks and many ordinary working people aren't buying the crap you're peddling.

good grief, you want to see dripping with hate look at your ugly and hateful post against your own fellow countrymen and women

You people on the left/dems make me sick how much hate you have inside you all over POLITICS

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wallace was elected by a majority of blacks for his last term of governor. He won by increasing taxation and governmenet funding for schools and other projects. i.e. once you strip out the racial stuff, Wallace was a progressive and a populist.
It's a shame that US schools have produced someone as ignorant as you are of basic elemental facts.

His last term as Governor ended in 1987.

In between that time he lost a bid at the 1968 president election under the American Independent Party ticket (because he couldn't run as a Democrat at this point) -- with a platform of segregation (and carried five southern states)

and was four year later put in a wheelchair by an attempted assassination. This gave him ...pause.

He later, as we know, came to his senses, apologized, and sought forgiveness. There was a whole lot that came between the Wallace of the 1950's 60's ----------- and the Wallace of the later 70's and 80's.

So don't even try buddy. Don't even try.

Idiot.

Wallace is the perfect example of the schism of the Democratic Party as I called it the other day.

If the conservative, states rights, segregationist South were still a part of the Democratic Party,

Rand Paul would be a Democrat.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The article, btw, is brilliant,

mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

"The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party."

That summarized it perfectly from OnePercenter's link.

An oversimplification based on hyper partisanship from one of the biggest poseurs of this board.
Shocking.

IOW, you can't refute a word of it.

 

[The Rabbi]

Wallace was elected by a majority of blacks for his last term of governor. He won by increasing taxation and governmenet funding for schools and other projects. i.e. once you strip out the racial stuff, Wallace was a progressive and a populist.
It's a shame that US schools have produced someone as ignorant as you are of basic elemental facts.

His last term as Governor ended in 1987.

In between that time he lost a bid at the 1968 president election under the American Independent Party ticket (because he couldn't run as a Democrat at this point) -- with a platform of segregation (and carried five southern states)

and was four year later put in a wheelchair by an attempted assassination. This gave him ...pause.

He later, as we know, came to his senses, apologized, and sought forgiveness. There was a whole lot that came between the Wallace of the 1950's 60's ----------- and the Wallace of the later 70's and 80's.

So don't even try buddy. Don't even try.

Idiot.

None of that refutes anything I wrote. Actually it supports it. THere is conflcting evidence on whether Wallace himself was even personally a racist, as much as an opportunist who saw a way to make a poltiical career.
Your pathetic resorts to Wiki to educate yourself are, well, pathetic.

 

[The Rabbi]

The article, btw, is brilliant,

mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

"The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party."

That summarized it perfectly from OnePercenter's link.

An oversimplification based on hyper partisanship from one of the biggest poseurs of this board.
Shocking.

IOW, you can't refute a word of it.

It pretty much refutes itself for anyone with a passing knowledge of these things and two funcitoning brain cells.
i.e. that excludes you.

 

[paperview]

Wallace was elected by a majority of blacks for his last term of governor. He won by increasing taxation and governmenet funding for schools and other projects. i.e. once you strip out the racial stuff, Wallace was a progressive and a populist.
It's a shame that US schools have produced someone as ignorant as you are of basic elemental facts.

His last term as Governor ended in 1987.

In between that time he lost a bid at the 1968 president election under the American Independent Party ticket (because he couldn't run as a Democrat at this point) -- with a platform of segregation (and carried five southern states)

and was four year later put in a wheelchair by an attempted assassination. This gave him ...pause.

He later, as we know, came to his senses, apologized, and sought forgiveness. There was a whole lot that came between the Wallace of the 1950's 60's ----------- and the Wallace of the later 70's and 80's.

So don't even try buddy. Don't even try.

Idiot.

Wallace is the perfect example of the schism of the Democratic Party as I called it the other day.

If the conservative, states rights, segregationist South were still a part of the Democratic Party,

Rand Paul would be a Democrat.

Without a doubt.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The article, btw, is brilliant,

mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

"The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party."

That summarized it perfectly from OnePercenter's link.

So you have a comprehensive list of all the converts,say people like Bird and Wallace that switched parties??

Repeating something over and over that is not true will never be true,no matter what.

Goldwater won the South in 1964, the same year he voted against the Civil Rights Act. The South hadn't gone Republican for decades before that, if ever.

Who do you think those voters for Goldwater were? They were Goldwater Democrats. They were conservative, states rights, segregationist Democrats who voted Republican.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

"The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party."

That summarized it perfectly from OnePercenter's link.

An oversimplification based on hyper partisanship from one of the biggest poseurs of this board.
Shocking.

IOW, you can't refute a word of it.

It pretty much refutes itself for anyone with a passing knowledge of these things and two funcitoning brain cells.
i.e. that excludes you.

Like I said, you can't refute a word of it and are even retarded enough to try that line.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'd like to hear which parts of the article were in fact historically inaccurate.

Give us a list.

I read 3 pages trying to find that out. The only thing I've seen is "dems posted a picture lol"

 

[NYcarbineer]

In 1968 George Wallace won Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana.

In 1964, Goldwater won 4 of those 5 states among the 6 he managed to win.

See?