The Democrats are going about it in the wrong way

JGalt

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2011
70,111
83,784
3,635
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Instead, they came up with a goofy old white doofus with crazy hair, spewing wacky socialist ideas, while owning 3 homes and driving a $200k car. Totally not believable.

What the hell is wrong with them, anyway?
 
That goofy old white doofus with crazy hair dude has an incredible following, you really should not underestimate him. If the youth turnout in droves to vote for him you might be shocked at what happens.
 
What's wrong with republicans electing a silver spoon NYC billionaire sleaze bag to represent the common folk? Couldn't have found someone further removed from everyday American life than Trump.
 
That goofy old white doofus with crazy hair dude has an incredible following, you really should not underestimate him. If the youth turnout in droves to vote for him you might be shocked at what happens.
the people that will be the most surprised are the ones that voted for the socialist if said socialist were to win ! they will be shocked when their dream becomes a nightmare and the suffering that will surely ensue when the economy collapses ! not recession not depression but a collapse like in Venezuela .
 
What's wrong with republicans electing a silver spoon NYC billionaire sleaze bag to represent the common folk? Couldn't have found someone further removed from everyday American life than Trump.

And yet he represents them steadfastly and admirably while the globalist-multiculturalist, indeed, racist, race-baiting identitarian Democratic Party loathes the common American man, the integrity of America's national sovereignty and citizenship. The political left most especially loathes those who fear God and passionately love America and liberty.
 
That goofy old white doofus with crazy hair dude has an incredible following, you really should not underestimate him. If the youth turnout in droves to vote for him you might be shocked at what happens.

I'm not going to be surprised at all. That old fart is doing more to help reelect Trump than anyone else and I for one appreciate his efforts, BIGLEY.
 
Last edited:
What's wrong with republicans electing a silver spoon NYC billionaire sleaze bag to represent the common folk? Couldn't have found someone further removed from everyday American life than Trump.

Yes, they could have. Your candidate Bloomberg, a silver-spooned NYC mega multi-billionaire sleazebag lying fascist tyrant Mini-Me who wants to tell you how much soda you can drink.
 
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Instead, they came up with a goofy old white doofus with crazy hair, spewing wacky socialist ideas, while owning 3 homes and driving a $200k car. Totally not believable.

What the hell is wrong with them, anyway?


Rats in a maze have few options other than to set traps for themselves. End of an ending . . .
 
That goofy old white doofus with crazy hair dude has an incredible following, you really should not underestimate him. If the youth turnout in droves to vote for him you might be shocked at what happens.
the people that will be the most surprised are the ones that voted for the socialist if said socialist were to win ! they will be shocked when their dream becomes a nightmare and the suffering that will surely ensue when the economy collapses ! not recession not depression but a collapse like in Venezuela .

That is a possibility, though I doubt congress goes along with much of his plans
 
What's wrong with republicans electing a silver spoon NYC billionaire sleaze bag to represent the common folk? Couldn't have found someone further removed from everyday American life than Trump.

Yes, they could have. Your candidate Bloomberg, a silver-spooned NYC mega multi-billionaire sleazebag lying fascist tyrant Mini-Me who wants to tell you how much soda you can drink.

how is he doing in the primaries?
 
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Instead, they came up with a goofy old white doofus with crazy hair, spewing wacky socialist ideas, while owning 3 homes and driving a $200k car. Totally not believable.

What the hell is wrong with them, anyway?

On average Sanders support is roughly 30% of Democrats. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e..._democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html

That means 70% of Democrats do not want Sanders as their candidate.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to beat Trump.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to recapture the House.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to win the Senate.

It is well and good for Sanders and Warren to shout out to their followers they must be bold. It is also quite stupid to be idealistic when the opposition party controls the White House and the Senate. Sanders and Warren are putting the cart before the horse. Sanders and Warren are asking for a cart before the horse when there is no cart. The Democrats must first win the White House and Congress before embarking on needed changes.

Democrats need to ask themselves, what good are their bold and idealistic dreams if Trump is in office for four more years and the GOP controls Congress? They are dreaming if they think Americans will chose a socialist to be their President.
 
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Excluding articulate and reasonably intelligent, they have one in their party, but she's too young to be President and is serving as a NY Congresswoman.
 
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Instead, they came up with a goofy old white doofus with crazy hair, spewing wacky socialist ideas, while owning 3 homes and driving a $200k car. Totally not believable.

What the hell is wrong with them, anyway?

On average Sanders support is roughly 30% of Democrats. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e..._democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html

That means 70% of Democrats do not want Sanders as their candidate.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to beat Trump.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to recapture the House.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to win the Senate.

It is well and good for Sanders and Warren to shout out to their followers they must be bold. It is also quite stupid to be idealistic when the opposition party controls the White House and the Senate. Sanders and Warren are putting the cart before the horse. Sanders and Warren are asking for a cart before the horse when there is no cart. The Democrats must first win the White House and Congress before embarking on needed changes.

Democrats need to ask themselves, what good are their bold and idealistic dreams if Trump is in office for four more years and the GOP controls Congress? They are dreaming if they think Americans will chose a socialist to be their President.

Which Dem has more than 30% support of their party?

At this point in the process 4 years ago Trump did not even have 30% support from the Repubs.

Things change.
 
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Excluding articulate and reasonably intelligent, they have one in their party, but she's too young to be President and is serving as a NY Congresswoman.

Shudder....
 
What's wrong with republicans electing a silver spoon NYC billionaire sleaze bag to represent the common folk? Couldn't have found someone further removed from everyday American life than Trump.

Trump is presiding over a super economy. Bernie and the others are promising to put that to an end. Warren stated if elected, the first thing she would do is sign an EO banning all fracking in the US. Under a commie President, the southern border would open up again further destroying our economy.

I'll take the silver spoon NYC billionaire any day of the week.
 
The only thing it would take for them to elect a Socialist President would have been for them to come up with a young, articulate, reasonably-intelligent, well-spoken, good-looking non-white, male or female Democratic Socialist to run for President.

Instead, they came up with a goofy old white doofus with crazy hair, spewing wacky socialist ideas, while owning 3 homes and driving a $200k car. Totally not believable.

What the hell is wrong with them, anyway?

On average Sanders support is roughly 30% of Democrats. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e..._democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html

That means 70% of Democrats do not want Sanders as their candidate.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to beat Trump.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to recapture the House.

30% of Democrats is not sufficient to win the Senate.

It is well and good for Sanders and Warren to shout out to their followers they must be bold. It is also quite stupid to be idealistic when the opposition party controls the White House and the Senate. Sanders and Warren are putting the cart before the horse. Sanders and Warren are asking for a cart before the horse when there is no cart. The Democrats must first win the White House and Congress before embarking on needed changes.

Democrats need to ask themselves, what good are their bold and idealistic dreams if Trump is in office for four more years and the GOP controls Congress? They are dreaming if they think Americans will chose a socialist to be their President.

Which Dem has more than 30% support of their party?

At this point in the process 4 years ago Trump did not even have 30% support from the Repubs.

Things change.

You don't have to be Zoltar the Great to see that things aren't going to suddenly change for the Democrats. Although it I were Zoltar the Great, I would predict a Trumpian massacre of the Democrats in 2020.
 

Forum List

Back
Top