the cycle child poverty creates

Your dumb as a fucking post vel

LOL. It's so much easier for you to resort to school yard name calling than it is to explore the fact that we've handed out money for generations to try to improve child poverty and yet it continues to grow. All your ( note the proper use of the word your ) way has accomplished is generational welfare as a career choice.
 
Your dumb as a fucking post vel

LOL. It's so much easier for you to resort to school yard name calling than it is to explore the fact that we've handed out money for generations to try to improve child poverty and yet it continues to grow. All your ( note the proper use of the word your ) way has accomplished is generational welfare as a career choice.

why did you not even look at the study?
 
This is why your party is dying.


You find it prefectly fine to say fuck you and I dont care to hungry American children.

Buy a tomb stone for your party

No, I didn't say that "I don't care to hungry American children". I said take those children and put them in safe situations where they can learn how to become functioning adults rather than permanent parasites on society. Learn to read the written word please.
 
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/129/1/e224.full.pdf




Translating Developmental Science Into Lifelong Health
Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Role of the Pediatrician

Advances in a wide range of biological, behavioral, and social sciences
are expanding our understanding of how early environmental influences
(the ecology) and genetic predispositions (the biologic program) affect
learning capacities, adaptive behaviors, lifelong physical and mental
health, and adult productivity. A supporting technical report from the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) presents an integrated ecobiodevelopmental
framework to assist in translating these dramatic advances
in developmental science into improved health across the life span.
Pediatricians are now armed with new information about the adverse
effects of toxic stress on brain development, as well as a deeper understanding
of the early life origins of many adult diseases. As trusted authorities
in child health and development, pediatric providers must now
complement the early identification of developmental concerns with
a greater focus on those interventions and community investments that
reduce external threats to healthy brain growth. To this end, AAP
endorses a developing leadership role for the entire pediatric community—
one that mobilizes the scientific expertise of both basic and
clinical researchers, the family-centered care of the pediatric medical
home, and the public influence of AAP and its state chapters—to
catalyze fundamental change in early childhood policy and services.
AAP is committed to leveraging science to inform the development of
innovative strategies to reduce the precipitants of toxic stress in young
children and to mitigate their negative effects on the course of development
and health across the life span. Pediatrics 2012;129:e224–e231

have you the honesty to read it?
 
there are many reasons any country would be better off not allowing children to be raised in poverty.

Why does the right want children raised in poverty?

what is it they think we gain?



They dont. But the you seem to feel that welfare is a way of life.
 
Your dumb as a fucking post vel

LOL. It's so much easier for you to resort to school yard name calling than it is to explore the fact that we've handed out money for generations to try to improve child poverty and yet it continues to grow. All your ( note the proper use of the word your ) way has accomplished is generational welfare as a career choice.

why did you not even look at the study?

I looked at your study, I just feel that money can't overcome poor quality parents.
 
This is why your party is dying.


You find it prefectly fine to say fuck you and I dont care to hungry American children.

Buy a tomb stone for your party


It ain't my party idiot and I doubt seriously there will be a tombstone for that party anytime soon.

Ain't seen any kids starving in the streets lately. I'll be sure to look for em along with grammy and grampy eating catfood.

I'll let you know if I find either.
 
there are many reasons any country would be better off not allowing children to be raised in poverty.

Why does the right want children raised in poverty?

what is it they think we gain?

You are an idiot. I grew up poor. I did not turn to crime, nor drugs nor violence. Those are excuses the left fabricates to explain away personal responsibility. as for poverty, in this country the term is a joke. Now a days no one in this Country goes without. What is poverty? In this Country it means you don't have an x box right?
 
the right pretends these children dont exsist.

then they pretend these studies dont exsist.

then they say its good for the kids just like this con idiot

And people like you pretend that giving money to these children's parents is the answer. If you really want to help those children have a successful life, lead the campaign to have them removed from their parents permanent custody.

this is what you said , it is contrary to every study on the wealfare of children and would cost the goverment HUGE sums of money.

why is it you people on the right hate to deal in facts?
 
If the chubby kids are actually starving, then the answer is obvious. The parents are wasting the money they get to feed the children. Remove those children and start putting them iin homes where they can be safely fed. Bring back the orphanage. Schools give 3 meals a day to chilldren and that's not enough. Nothing is really enough to maintain the poor in the style to which they would like to become accustomed. To democrats, the communist way is the best way. Take the kids put them in dormitories.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/129/1/e224.full.pdf




Translating Developmental Science Into Lifelong Health
Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Role of the Pediatrician

Advances in a wide range of biological, behavioral, and social sciences
are expanding our understanding of how early environmental influences
(the ecology) and genetic predispositions (the biologic program) affect
learning capacities, adaptive behaviors, lifelong physical and mental
health, and adult productivity. A supporting technical report from the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) presents an integrated ecobiodevelopmental
framework to assist in translating these dramatic advances
in developmental science into improved health across the life span.
Pediatricians are now armed with new information about the adverse
effects of toxic stress on brain development, as well as a deeper understanding
of the early life origins of many adult diseases. As trusted authorities
in child health and development, pediatric providers must now
complement the early identification of developmental concerns with
a greater focus on those interventions and community investments that
reduce external threats to healthy brain growth. To this end, AAP
endorses a developing leadership role for the entire pediatric community—
one that mobilizes the scientific expertise of both basic and
clinical researchers, the family-centered care of the pediatric medical
home, and the public influence of AAP and its state chapters—to
catalyze fundamental change in early childhood policy and services.
AAP is committed to leveraging science to inform the development of
innovative strategies to reduce the precipitants of toxic stress in young
children and to mitigate their negative effects on the course of development
and health across the life span. Pediatrics 2012;129:e224–e231

have you the honesty to read it?

Did you realize that the above blurb can be reduced to one sentence along
the lines of 'we are sure that lots of new things are being learned and we
know them better than you do, so come to us for advice.'

Sounds like every Liberal I've ever come across....
 
Your dumb as a fucking post vel

LOL. It's so much easier for you to resort to school yard name calling than it is to explore the fact that we've handed out money for generations to try to improve child poverty and yet it continues to grow. All your ( note the proper use of the word your ) way has accomplished is generational welfare as a career choice.

Don't worry Vel. Truthspatters will hit you with "cold hard facts" any minute now.

All of her facts are cold and hard.

Stay tuned. LOL
 
This is why your party is dying.


You find it prefectly fine to say fuck you and I dont care to hungry American children.

Buy a tomb stone for your party


It ain't my party idiot and I doubt seriously there will be a tombstone for that party anytime soon.

Ain't seen any kids starving in the streets lately. I'll be sure to look for em along with grammy and grampy eating catfood.

I'll let you know if I find either.

so now you are just going to pretend no kids go hungry and poverty is is good for kids.


Yes it is your party because you spout their platform every time I see you post
 
the right pretends these children dont exsist.

then they pretend these studies dont exsist.

then they say its good for the kids just like this con idiot

And people like you pretend that giving money to these children's parents is the answer. If you really want to help those children have a successful life, lead the campaign to have them removed from their parents permanent custody.

this is what you said , it is contrary to every study on the wealfare of children and would cost the goverment HUGE sums of money.

why is it you people on the right hate to deal in facts?

You've got to be one of the dumbest people I have ever encountered.
 
What does the right feel it gains by refusing to help kids in poverty?

Refusing to be FORCED while other ride scott free is not refusing to help others... it is refusing to let you and those like you infringe on the very same freedoms you want for yourself, yet so easily try and take away from others when you think they are the only ones who need to pay for your wants, needs, and whims
 
Your dumb as a fucking post vel

LOL. It's so much easier for you to resort to school yard name calling than it is to explore the fact that we've handed out money for generations to try to improve child poverty and yet it continues to grow. All your ( note the proper use of the word your ) way has accomplished is generational welfare as a career choice.

Don't worry Vel. Truthspatters will hit you with "cold hard facts" any minute now.

All of her facts are cold and hard.

Stay tuned. LOL

You just ignored the science I provided huh?
 
What does the right feel it gains by refusing to help kids in poverty?

Refusing to be FORCED while other ride scott free is not refusing to help others... it is refusing to let you and those like you infringe on the very same freedoms you want for yourself, yet so easily try and take away from others when you think they are the only ones who need to pay for your wants, needs, and whims

Did you read the study?
 
the right pretends these children dont exsist.

then they pretend these studies dont exsist.

then they say its good for the kids just like this con idiot

And people like you pretend that giving money to these children's parents is the answer. If you really want to help those children have a successful life, lead the campaign to have them removed from their parents permanent custody.

this is what you said , it is contrary to every study on the wealfare of children and would cost the goverment HUGE sums of money.

why is it you people on the right hate to deal in facts?

Speaking of facts, when will you recognize that your way hasn't worked?
 
LOL. It's so much easier for you to resort to school yard name calling than it is to explore the fact that we've handed out money for generations to try to improve child poverty and yet it continues to grow. All your ( note the proper use of the word your ) way has accomplished is generational welfare as a career choice.

why did you not even look at the study?

I looked at your study, I just feel that money can't overcome poor quality parents.

Oh really then what were its findings?
 

Forum List

Back
Top