The Constitution bars Trump from holding public office ever again

Trump fid not try to overthrow the government

But the lib Deep State is trying to rule the nation from underneath its wet rock
Trump did try to overturn the result of an election to reinstall himself to power. There is no lib deep state. trump is the deep state.
 
Trump did try to overturn the result of an election to reinstall himself to power. There is no lib deep state. trump is the deep state.
Trump challenged a rigged election

Something nixon should have done in 1960 but chose not to

Trump exposed the democrats along with the inside washington club for the cheaters they are

But overthrow the government by force through Buffalo Man?

Dont be silly
 
No, when I see a mob storming through the Capitol, Congressmen running for their lives, and Capitol Policemen being ironically beaten senseless with Thin Blue Line flags, that sure as hell looks like an attempted coup to most sensible people.
See post 43
 
Trump challenged a rigged election

Except it wasn't rigged. Trump's own people told him it wasn't, and he fired them.

Something nixon should have done in 1960 but chose not to

Because he didn't have a case to stand on. Even if he COULD have challenged the Illinois results based on Daley Graveyard Vote, he still lost the electoral vote 276 - 246.

Trump exposed the democrats along with the inside washington club for the cheaters they are

But overthrow the government by force through Buffalo Man?

Dont be silly
The problem is Buffalo Man was a mentally ill person who Trump spent months riling up.
 
Except it wasn't rigged. Trump's own people told him it wasn't, and he fired them.



Because he didn't have a case to stand on. Even if he COULD have challenged the Illinois results based on Daley Graveyard Vote, he still lost the electoral vote 276 - 246.


The problem is Buffalo Man was a mentally ill person who Trump spent months riling up.
I concede that the election cheating was subtile and extremely clever

Libs made wholesale changes to election rules driven by fear of the wuhan virus which opened the door for the election result they wanted - namely to stop trump

Though you got away with it at the cost of installing a senile old man the cat is out of the bag and you have lost the confidence of half of America

Thanks to anti trumpsters we are a banana republic now
 
I concede that the election cheating was subtile and extremely clever

I know, those darned darkies tricked you by showing up and voting!!! How dastardly!!!

Libs made wholesale changes to election rules driven by fear of the wuhan virus which opened the door for the election result they wanted - namely to stop trump

Or they just made changes that were sensible and practical. There's really no reason why most of us can't vote by mail. We do our taxes by mail, we do the census by mail.

Though you got away with it at the cost of installing a senile old man the cat is out of the bag and you have lost the confidence of half of America

Thanks to anti trumpsters we are a banana republic now

Oh, bullshit. Trump was never popular. He won on a fluke, screwed up the worst since James Buchanan, and got bounced out of office. This isn't fucking complicated
 
I know, those darned darkies tricked you by showing up and voting!!! How dastardly!!!
Playing the race card was uncalled for unless you absolutely need it to keep up and refuse to concede

If a MAGA voter called black people “darkies” you would collapse with horror and shout “See!!! what that trump voter said”
 
Playing the race card was uncalled for unless you absolutely need it to keep up and refuse to concede

If a MAGA voter called black people “darkies” you would collapse with horror and shout “See!!! what that trump voter said”

It's all about the race card with you people... All you folks have is "White Grievance", hoping to God that White Working Class people don't figure out they're really been fucked over by other white people.

But all your complaints about 2020 are that the people in the Big Cities voted by mail. Boo-fucking-hoo.
 
It's all about the race card with you people... All you folks have is "White Grievance", hoping to God that White Working Class people don't figure out they're really been fucked over by other white people.

But all your complaints about 2020 are that the people in the Big Cities voted by mail. Boo-fucking-hoo.
You dragged race into the conversation, not me

And its because you have no other cards to play
 
Actually, I pointed out the obvious.
You guys were upset they changed to rules to make it easier for the inner city people to vote.

Who lives in the inner city.
All you did was set up a strawman
 
The Constitution bars Trump from holding public office ever again

While some on the right portray accountability for the Jan. 6 Capitol riot as just another partisan dispute,]two prominent conservative legal scholars have made the case that the Constitution disqualifies former President Trump from public office.

Last week, law professors William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — both members of the conservative Federalist Society — argued in a law review article that Trump is already constitutionally forbidden from serving in public office because of Section Three of the 14th Amendment.


Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal consequences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.

First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, supersedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participation or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election.


Now if you want to play word games, 1-6 was most certainly a rebellion. And trump was the organizer. Therefore, he is ineligible to run for president. And these ain't no liberal woke activist judges saying this.

THEY ARE CONSERVATIVES AND THEY ARE SAYING THAT TRUMP IS CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE FOR OFFICE.

checkmate-in-chess.jpg


Checkmate
False headline and retardedly ignorant OP.

The Constitution isn’t governed by mere allegations, IM.2, you diseased asshole.
 
The Constitution bars Trump from holding public office ever again

While some on the right portray accountability for the Jan. 6 Capitol riot as just another partisan dispute,]two prominent conservative legal scholars have made the case that the Constitution disqualifies former President Trump from public office.

Last week, law professors William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — both members of the conservative Federalist Society — argued in a law review article that Trump is already constitutionally forbidden from serving in public office because of Section Three of the 14th Amendment.


Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal consequences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.

First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, supersedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participation or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election.


Now if you want to play word games, 1-6 was most certainly a rebellion. And trump was the organizer. Therefore, he is ineligible to run for president. And these ain't no liberal woke activist judges saying this.

THEY ARE CONSERVATIVES AND THEY ARE SAYING THAT TRUMP IS CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE FOR OFFICE.

checkmate-in-chess.jpg


Checkmate

That's the dem's plan.

carville.jpg


Trump is getting schooled really good on retribution and kicking ass...isn't he.


trump hillary save america.jpg
 
All I did was say the quiet part out loud.
You guys are terrified of people of color voting.
If you weren't, you wouldn't engage in all sort of voter suppression schemes.
No one said that except you

Its a strawman
 
Trump challenged a rigged election

Something nixon should have done in 1960 but chose not to

Trump exposed the democrats along with the inside washington club for the cheaters they are

But overthrow the government by force through Buffalo Man?

Dont be silly
There was no rigged election.
 

Forum List

Back
Top