Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #41
Everyone's pro life, including those who work to protect a woman's right to privacy, where 'banning' abortion violates a woman's protected liberty to make personal decisions absent unwarranted interference by the state.Meet The GOP Congresswoman Who’s Tearing Her Party Apart Over Abortion
Conservatives aren’t very happy with Rep. Renee Ellmers this week. Over the course of just a few days, the Republican congresswoman from North Carolina has become an unlikely symbol for Republicans’ brewing divisions over abortion policy.
Ellmers is being accused of betraying her party — several articles published on the right-wing Red State accuse her of being “worse than a Democrat” and “two-faced” — for thwarting a proposed 20-week abortion ban that was scheduled to come up for a vote this week. On Thursday afternoon, anti-abortion activists Jill Stanek and Patrick Mahoney held a protest outside of Ellmers’ office, urging activists to stand against “Congressman Ellmers’ blockage of a bill to protect babies destined for death by abortion.”
A Republican who can think for herself?
This could be interesting.
What's interesting is that Liberals believe the only time someone thinks for themselves is when they think like Liberals. Let someone be pro life on this issue and you'll be the first one telling them to quit drinking the Republican Kool Aid.
The conflict isn't about abortion, the conflict is about how best to end the practice, where seeking to 'ban' abortion is not only un-Constitutional, it will also have little effect if any bringing about its end.
Un-Constitutional measures that attempt to 'ban' abortion work only to expand the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.
So as long as someone thinks like you, they think for themselves? I was correct about your type.