- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,041
- 16,267
- 2,180
"...an extremist militia motivated by the goals of the tea party movement seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest. The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens."
God damn right I would want the army to go in and take control of the city back from an "extremist militia. Who in their right mind would support a militia taking over a town and holding it's elected offical hostage?
A more realistic scenario would be OWS taking over Wall Street and holding traders hostage..
The Tea Party never demonstrated any sort of violence yet the Tea Party is used as the faux aggressor in this fictional scenario?
Besides, why the hell would a libertarian militia take a town when there would be no strategic point in doing such? - it would be more practical to take over the local military base itself.... The military would have big fucking problems if a base was seized....
In the senario offered by the article doesn't say it was the Tea Party but a militia motivated by their goals, seizes a town. The key here is 'Seizes a Town' I don't care which extremist group or which town they take. It would be up to the military to restore order in that town. No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
Lib-o-Pauli is gunning for more Fauxrageous stuff. His premise is ridiculous.