grunt11b
VIP Member
To be fair -- shell casings do not tie the murder weapon to the man. The gun could have been given or transferred. BUT -
I'm convinced that the facts were reviewed carefully and the courts INCLUDING the Sup. Ct wouldn't have passed if there was reason for appeal.
Personally, I'm more concerned about the 8 or 10 innocent people a year shot dead in no-knock drug searches triggered only by a drug-adled snitch trying to impress the D.A.
If it was an automatic handgun, then there would be similar slide marks on the casings, they match up almost like the slide marks you would see on a bullet after it is fired. Same concept. So it could tie him in quite well at the scene of both crimes. Could the hand gun of been given to him from the first scene? Yes, but there where eyewitnesses at both scenes so it's cut and dry. The only reason the casings where even brought up was because bleeding heart liberals where screaming "Physical evidence", of course in this case there was no struggle at all for there to be such evidence, so the casings where used.