Birdzeye
Member
- Apr 4, 2007
- 61
- 6
- 6
No at all
My opinion is based on the lunacy of liberalism and the arrogrance and hate the left shows on a daily basis
Care to provide some credible evidence to back up those claims?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No at all
My opinion is based on the lunacy of liberalism and the arrogrance and hate the left shows on a daily basis
pretty lame evidence.
RSR, would you consider your daily diatribe of lib bashing as hate?
I think it's a hoot that he provides a Hannity video about the hateful things liberals say, but is strangely silent about the hate speech against liberals spewed by Coulter and Limbaugh. Selective outrage, anyone?
I think it's a hoot that he provides a Hannity video about the hateful things liberals say, but is strangely silent about the hate speech against liberals spewed by Coulter and Limbaugh. Selective outrage, anyone?
pretty lame evidence.
RSR, would you consider your daily diatribe of lib bashing as hate?
I think it's a hoot that he provides a Hannity video about the hateful things liberals say, but is strangely silent about the hate speech against liberals spewed by Coulter and Limbaugh. Selective outrage, anyone?
selective memory too. Or maybe just a double standard about what constitutes hate.
Hating Muslims for example might be exempt, or hating commie fagot lefties (who hate amerka).
So you have no problem with the over taxed workers in MI to pay for Ipods for all school kids?
You didn't answer the question.
Ann can be over the top at times, but what "hate" has Rush said on his program?
The truth about libs does not count
Compete?
with who ?
The corporate whores like Limpballs or Cultwhore?
I can understand why you dont want the fairness doctrine back it makes it so people using the airwaves have to give all sides to a story instead of just the corporate propaganda.
Care to provide some credible evidence to back up those claims?
I would say our very own Truthmatters is a shinning example of the arrogance part at least.
But nobody can hold a candle to RSR in the arrogance department.
Why would you want to 'make' anybody listen to anything? I guess you could legilate that there be equal time, but that's it. You can't make anyone listen to it.
The assumptions of those who are attempting to implement this would have to be many for it to make any sense:
- What reason is there for it unless you assume that because people listen to it they must agree with it?
- What reason is there for it unless you assume that people will actually listen to whatever time the government legislates for libs?
- What reason is there for it unless you assume that you are simply smarter than the people listening now and this is just for their own good?
I see someone has never actually read the fairness doctrine