CDZ The American Republican Denial of Climate change.

I love the hoax theory. Yeah, tens of thousands of scientists going all the way back to the mid 1700s all got together and dreamed up this hoax so that 300 or so years later, in a country that didn't even exist back then, on a continent that hadn't been discovered yet, some jack ass politician, could raise your taxes

Brilliant

Absoulutely and stunningly brilliant


Too bad...this is the CDZ...

Anyway......the hoax is recent...the data that shows that we have had ice ages and warming periods is fact. The fact that left wing/regressives see this hoax as an opportunity for both personal wealth and fame and as an excuse to increase government control over the economy and society is just that...a fact.

Considering that not one computer model has been accurate, and they can't explain the 18 year pause in warming........and the fact that the scientists have been caught lying about the data......yeah....man made global warming is a hoax.
 
Oh the hoax is recent, well that makes all the difference in the world. ;--)

So if the science isn't a hoax whats yur problem ;--) ?
 
Is it not ironic that the very people subscribing to the evolution of man from ape are the same ones now attempting to reverse evolutionary change? The world has been warming and cooling for millenniums, will continue to do so, species will perish, adaptable species will flourish, but we don't seem to see new ones replacing them do we? Possibly we, like dinosaurs and other species were destined from the start to extinguish all trace of our existence, so be it, lets call it evolution. Regardless you nor I will rule and conquer nature.
 
Is it not ironic that the very people subscribing to the evolution of man from ape are the same ones now attempting to reverse evolutionary change? The world has been warming and cooling for millenniums, will continue to do so, species will perish, adaptable species will flourish, but we don't seem to see new ones replacing them do we? Possibly we, like dinosaurs and other species were destined from the start to extinguish all trace of our existence, so be it, lets call it evolution. Regardless you nor I will rule and conquer nature.

Or maybe we screwed up the atmospheric chemistry to the point where we are inducing a massive extinction level shift in climate.

And have the means to fix it before we're next on the list.
 
"At this point is there really any excuse to deny mankind has brought this on itself ?"

There is no good reason to believe that it exists except as an altogether natural process.
 
Oh the hoax is recent, well that makes all the difference in the world. ;--)

So if the science isn't a hoax whats yur problem ;--) ?


The problem is they are saying it is because of humans that the planet is warming and cooling......it isn't new...and it isn't because of us......
 
Is it not ironic that the very people subscribing to the evolution of man from ape are the same ones now attempting to reverse evolutionary change? The world has been warming and cooling for millenniums, will continue to do so, species will perish, adaptable species will flourish, but we don't seem to see new ones replacing them do we? Possibly we, like dinosaurs and other species were destined from the start to extinguish all trace of our existence, so be it, lets call it evolution. Regardless you nor I will rule and conquer nature.

Or maybe we screwed up the atmospheric chemistry to the point where we are inducing a massive extinction level shift in climate.

And have the means to fix it before we're next on the list.


except for that 18 year pause.........and all the other things the computer models didn't apparently predict....
 
Yeah....man made climate change is a hoax.....

Ho Hum: Another Study, Glo-bull Warming Is Bull | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

The last time I looked, more than 50,000 scientists had added their names to a list of climate realists; and now another study agrees with hundreds more. “Climate change,” the political Left’s code name for “global warming,” does not exist.

Not in a world where the mean global temperature is declining, sea levels are static to falling, glaciers are growing, Arctic and Antarctic sea ice are either above or within one standard deviation below the satellite age mean, and snow has fallen in the Caribbean – in April!

The article that is linked to...

Yes....climate change fascists are taking people who disagree with them to court......



Climate change consensus increasingly questioned amid government crackdown on dissent

The latest government crackdown on climate dissent, exemplified by last week’s subpoena of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, comes amid a surge of scientific research that pokes holes in the catastrophic climate change consensus.

Even as Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude E. Walker demanded the free market think tank’s climate research and communications, a rising tide of evidence has challenged the narrative that increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are driving floods, drought and other disasters.
 
So a blog, and a gun blog no less, is your "scientific" evidence that there's some kinda mass conspiracy going on ?

Please


No.....the blog links to the actual article which sites the studies....please....try to actually read the quote....you will actually learn the truth, the facts and the reality about the man made global warming hoax.....
 
So a blog, and a gun blog no less, is your "scientific" evidence that there's some kinda mass conspiracy going on ?

Please


the Washington Times article, linked in the story cites all of the new research showing that man made global warming is a hoax.....
 
You are hallucinating if you think this is a climate scientist.

Richardson_Valerie-350_s220x308.jpg


Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at [email protected].

Sorry but an opp ed piece by a nobody journalist isn't exactly what I call scientific evidence ;--)
 
this is a great piece on why man made climate change is a dumb theory...

Sayet: Why I’m a Denier (Hint: Because It’s Crap)

My skepticism of this new science is furthered even more by the knowledge that the “facts” upon which their models are created are based almost entirely on numbers that are not easily verified and which require great speculation to determine. If these “facts” are wrong then the models are useless (to say the least.) Remember, the whole global-warming theory is based on only a couple of degrees of change over many millennia. Do scientists really know what the temperature was in northeast Siberia in the year 802? Do they really know that number down to a single fraction of a degree? I’m skeptical and you should be, too.

My confidence in the conclusion of these alarmist scientists is further weakened because I’ve been here before. For as long as I can remember the “experts” – many the very same people pushing global warming hysteria today – have been predicting one ecological disaster after another. In the 1970s and virtually every year afterwards, we were doomed – doomed!!! – to global cooling, global wetting, global drying, mass starvation, acid rain, an epidemic of heterosexual AIDS, Mad Cow and, just the other day, a deadly pandemic of Swine Flu. Alarmism seems to be a tactic employed by scientists to draw attention to their causes, garner major funding and make a name for themselves and hyped by a willing news (and publishing) media because hysteria sells.

My trust in the conclusions of the alarmists is even further diminished by the unscientific methods the alarmists are using in their efforts. Not only are we now privy to leaked documents emailed back-and-forth between those at the head of the “climate change” research detailing the destruction of their work and their underhanded methods of preventing Freedom of Information laws to allow others to double-check their supposed findings, but the campaign to slander other scientists – those whose work sheds doubt on the alarmists’ claims – reeks of the kind of cowardice shown by those who know they are lying. Slander is not a scientific practice. Dubbing anyone who challenges their hysterical campaign as being like Holocaust deniers is an ad hominem attack with no scientific merit. In fact, it is anti-scientific, a means to discredit the man rather than the answering the opposing science.
 


At this point is there really any excuse to deny mankind has brought this on itself ?


NO ONE denies that there is climate change.

There is ZERO evidence that we have affected such change one way or the other.

/thread



You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
-- Daniel Patrick Moynihan​

Red:
Once again, albeit twice in in the same day, you have failed to check the facts that drive what you believe.
There is a reason Ronald Reagan said "trust, but verify." Sage advice and well worth following no matter what one hopes is so.

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.
-- Harlan Ellison​
 


At this point is there really any excuse to deny mankind has brought this on itself ?


NO ONE denies that there is climate change.

There is ZERO evidence that we have affected such change one way or the other.

/thread



You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
-- Daniel Patrick Moynihan​

Red:
Once again, albeit twice in in the same day, you have failed to check the facts that drive what you believe.
There is a reason Ronald Reagan said "trust, but verify." Sage advice and well worth following no matter what one hopes is so.

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.
-- Harlan Ellison​


Very convincing.
How much do we need to spend on windmills to make the warming stop?
 


At this point is there really any excuse to deny mankind has brought this on itself ?


NO ONE denies that there is climate change.

There is ZERO evidence that we have affected such change one way or the other.

/thread



You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
-- Daniel Patrick Moynihan​

Red:
Once again, albeit twice in in the same day, you have failed to check the facts that drive what you believe.
There is a reason Ronald Reagan said "trust, but verify." Sage advice and well worth following no matter what one hopes is so.

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.
-- Harlan Ellison​


Very convincing.
How much do we need to spend on windmills to make the warming stop?



I don't know. Hopefully less than we'd need to spend to build another planet on which to live once we ruin this one's environment.
 


At this point is there really any excuse to deny mankind has brought this on itself ?


NO ONE denies that there is climate change.

There is ZERO evidence that we have affected such change one way or the other.

/thread



You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
-- Daniel Patrick Moynihan​

Red:
Once again, albeit twice in in the same day, you have failed to check the facts that drive what you believe.
There is a reason Ronald Reagan said "trust, but verify." Sage advice and well worth following no matter what one hopes is so.

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.
-- Harlan Ellison​


Very convincing.
How much do we need to spend on windmills to make the warming stop?



I don't know. Hopefully less than we'd need to spend to build another planet on which to live once we ruin this one's environment.


Warmer is better for life on this planet, why would we have to leave?
 


At this point is there really any excuse to deny mankind has brought this on itself ?


NO ONE denies that there is climate change.

There is ZERO evidence that we have affected such change one way or the other.

/thread



You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
-- Daniel Patrick Moynihan​

Red:
Once again, albeit twice in in the same day, you have failed to check the facts that drive what you believe.
There is a reason Ronald Reagan said "trust, but verify." Sage advice and well worth following no matter what one hopes is so.

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.
-- Harlan Ellison​


Very convincing.
How much do we need to spend on windmills to make the warming stop?



I don't know. Hopefully less than we'd need to spend to build another planet on which to live once we ruin this one's environment.


Warmer is better for life on this planet, why would we have to leave?


Do you really see the topic that binarily and that narrowly?
 

Forum List

Back
Top