Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not really, you posted a simple minded nothing in order to bash liberals by pegging them into a certain corner. The internet and 24 news media has made such generalizations meaningless.
What's really funny is that all of the usual Liberal suspects showed up in this thread to toss in their nasty two cents... Saigon... As much as I hate your Politics I thought you were better than that.
I think you fairly much disproved your handle with this thread, didn't you?
It's not a comparison of liberal ideology with a "traditional" one, it's a comparison of trite cliche, half-truths and deliberate mistatements.
Seems pretty spot on to me!
The liberal dream is one of everyone getting an equal part of the pie no matter what. Billions will die when America becomes a third rate power as a shit storm will occur.
Not really, you posted a simple minded nothing in order to bash liberals by pegging them into a certain corner. The internet and 24 news media has made such generalizations meaningless.
Comparisons in a political forum are not meaningless when they highlight an ideological bent that has political ramifications-
Grow the fuck up and try not being such an asshole- or maybe it's just that you hang out here too much?
I think you fairly much disproved your handle with this thread, didn't you?
It's not a comparison of liberal ideology with a "traditional" one, it's a comparison of trite cliche, half-truths and deliberate mistatements.
Not really, you posted a simple minded nothing in order to bash liberals by pegging them into a certain corner. The internet and 24 news media has made such generalizations meaningless.
Comparisons in a political forum are not meaningless when they highlight an ideological bent that has political ramifications-
Grow the fuck up and try not being such an asshole- or maybe it's just that you hang out here too much?
well yes they meaningless when you do it in the style of what you posted.
which was the whole point all a long. You posted a shit graphic that is childish hoping people would come in and say : YAY! good job clevergirl!!!! You go girl!!! etc etc.....
you posted shit, own up to it for once.
I think you fairly much disproved your handle with this thread, didn't you?
It's not a comparison of liberal ideology with a "traditional" one, it's a comparison of trite cliche, half-truths and deliberate mistatements.
Seems pretty spot on to me!
I agree. That is why the left will respond with insults and not be able to articulate why they think it's wrong. Liberals do believe in government doing things for them and they will defend that, usually claiming the private sector cannot be trusted. Liberals believe in affirmative action and redistribution of wealth and the policies reflect this. They forever vilify the wealthy and always promise the takers that they will confiscate more on their behalf.
When Romney addressed the NAACP and talked about opportunities and job growth, he was criticized by the lefties for addressing a subject that meant nothing to the crowd. That was telling. When Obama talks to his supporters, he tells them what government plans to do for them. That is what some want to hear- what can my country do for me.
When people defend all the free stuff and say we cannot allow people to suffer from their own bad choices, you realize that it's about big brother stepping in to ensure that even the biggest loser lives as well as the hardest worker. That is their definition of equality- everyone having the same amount. It's not about effort or personal responsibility.
We used to be told to study in school, avoid drugs and think before we acted and that if we didn't, there would be consequences. How many parents used to tell their children to stay out of trouble and be responsible or they'd end up going hungry? Now, the government all but encourages irresponsible behavior by picking up the slack when people screw up. Now we have generations on welfare and the liberals call this success. People who wouldn't have a clue as to how to care for themselves without nanny government is the problem with this country, not a result of good governing.
I think you fairly much disproved your handle with this thread, didn't you?
It's not a comparison of liberal ideology with a "traditional" one, it's a comparison of trite cliche, half-truths and deliberate mistatements.
Seems pretty spot on to me!
I agree. That is why the left will respond with insults and not be able to articulate why they think it's wrong. Liberals do believe in government doing things for them and they will defend that, usually claiming the private sector cannot be trusted. Liberals believe in affirmative action and redistribution of wealth and the policies reflect this. They forever vilify the wealthy and always promise the takers that they will confiscate more on their behalf.
When Romney addressed the NAACP and talked about opportunities and job growth, he was criticized by the lefties for addressing a subject that meant nothing to the crowd. That was telling. When Obama talks to his supporters, he tells them what government plans to do for them. That is what some want to hear- what can my country do for me.
When people defend all the free stuff and say we cannot allow people to suffer from their own bad choices, you realize that it's about big brother stepping in to ensure that even the biggest loser lives as well as the hardest worker. That is their definition of equality- everyone having the same amount. It's not about effort or personal responsibility.
We used to be told to study in school, avoid drugs and think before we acted and that if we didn't, there would be consequences. How many parents used to tell their children to stay out of trouble and be responsible or they'd end up going hungry? Now, the government all but encourages irresponsible behavior by picking up the slack when people screw up. Now we have generations on welfare and the liberals call this success. People who wouldn't have a clue as to how to care for themselves without nanny government is the problem with this country, not a result of good governing.
Seems pretty spot on to me!
I agree. That is why the left will respond with insults and not be able to articulate why they think it's wrong. Liberals do believe in government doing things for them and they will defend that, usually claiming the private sector cannot be trusted. Liberals believe in affirmative action and redistribution of wealth and the policies reflect this. They forever vilify the wealthy and always promise the takers that they will confiscate more on their behalf.
When Romney addressed the NAACP and talked about opportunities and job growth, he was criticized by the lefties for addressing a subject that meant nothing to the crowd. That was telling. When Obama talks to his supporters, he tells them what government plans to do for them. That is what some want to hear- what can my country do for me.
When people defend all the free stuff and say we cannot allow people to suffer from their own bad choices, you realize that it's about big brother stepping in to ensure that even the biggest loser lives as well as the hardest worker. That is their definition of equality- everyone having the same amount. It's not about effort or personal responsibility.
We used to be told to study in school, avoid drugs and think before we acted and that if we didn't, there would be consequences. How many parents used to tell their children to stay out of trouble and be responsible or they'd end up going hungry? Now, the government all but encourages irresponsible behavior by picking up the slack when people screw up. Now we have generations on welfare and the liberals call this success. People who wouldn't have a clue as to how to care for themselves without nanny government is the problem with this country, not a result of good governing.
It's rather telling that they've got nothing to say on the topic of the thread... just verbal abuse for the OP.
I think you fairly much disproved your handle with this thread, didn't you?
It's not a comparison of liberal ideology with a "traditional" one, it's a comparison of trite cliche, half-truths and deliberate mistatements.
Seems pretty spot on to me!
I agree. That is why the left will respond with insults and not be able to articulate why they think it's wrong. Liberals do believe in government doing things for them and they will defend that, usually claiming the private sector cannot be trusted. Liberals believe in affirmative action and redistribution of wealth and the policies reflect this. They forever vilify the wealthy and always promise the takers that they will confiscate more on their behalf.
When Romney addressed the NAACP and talked about opportunities and job growth, he was criticized by the lefties for addressing a subject that meant nothing to the crowd. That was telling. When Obama talks to his supporters, he tells them what government plans to do for them. That is what some want to hear- what can my country do for me.
When people defend all the free stuff and say we cannot allow people to suffer from their own bad choices, you realize that it's about big brother stepping in to ensure that even the biggest loser lives as well as the hardest worker. That is their definition of equality- everyone having the same amount. It's not about effort or personal responsibility.
We used to be told to study in school, avoid drugs and think before we acted and that if we didn't, there would be consequences. How many parents used to tell their children to stay out of trouble and be responsible or they'd end up going hungry? Now, the government all but encourages irresponsible behavior by picking up the slack when people screw up. Now we have generations on welfare and the liberals call this success. People who wouldn't have a clue as to how to care for themselves without nanny government is the problem with this country, not a result of good governing.
Comparisons in a political forum are not meaningless when they highlight an ideological bent that has political ramifications-
Grow the fuck up and try not being such an asshole- or maybe it's just that you hang out here too much?
well yes they meaningless when you do it in the style of what you posted.
which was the whole point all a long. You posted a shit graphic that is childish hoping people would come in and say : YAY! good job clevergirl!!!! You go girl!!! etc etc.....
you posted shit, own up to it for once.
Well, no, it is not meaningless. It is a factual comparison of the ideological differences. That you don't like it is obvious. But your liking something is not relevant to its meaning- no matter how much you try to claim your opinion is the most accurate one.
Income Inequality or Lost Opportunity? What's Threatening the American Dream
My point was as simple as the graph made it. That you need a bogey man and a convoluted motive, indicates you need a break from the blogosphere dude.
I posted a link to the article accompanying the graph when another poster asked for it- maybe you should read the article...just sayin'
well yes they meaningless when you do it in the style of what you posted.
which was the whole point all a long. You posted a shit graphic that is childish hoping people would come in and say : YAY! good job clevergirl!!!! You go girl!!! etc etc.....
you posted shit, own up to it for once.
Well, no, it is not meaningless. It is a factual comparison of the ideological differences. That you don't like it is obvious. But your liking something is not relevant to its meaning- no matter how much you try to claim your opinion is the most accurate one.
Income Inequality or Lost Opportunity? What's Threatening the American Dream
My point was as simple as the graph made it. That you need a bogey man and a convoluted motive, indicates you need a break from the blogosphere dude.
I posted a link to the article accompanying the graph when another poster asked for it- maybe you should read the article...just sayin'
yes its heritage, a rightwing/neocon think group.
You make my point for me simplegirl.
exactly,because you are simple.
The liberal dream is one of everyone getting an equal part of the pie no matter what. Billions will die when America becomes a third rate power as a shit storm will occur.
The right winger's dream is one of only the rich getting every part of the pie no matter what. Billions will die when America becomes a third rate power as a shit storm will occur.
Now you've got it right