That Rainbow Whitehouse Light Display Took How Many Days To Set Up?

Equally as offensive as if a cross was projected upon LGBT 5-4 loss?

  • Yes.

  • No.


Results are only viewable after voting.
It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...
The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.....And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.....This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

It was touching how POTUS acted first to distance the majority of Americans opposed to gay marriage (polls at this site consistently run close to or at 80% opposed) from their own Whitehouse; and then to portray (falsely) to our sworn enemies (muslim extremists) "that all Americans are supporting this"...when POTUS knows that the major thorn these extremists cite over and over again...willing to blow themselves up for actually ....is that "the infidels" are depraved as a soceity.

Way to go president Dumbfuck.

I want to see those Whitehouse logs. I want to see when this display first got launched off the ground. We may have an impeachment proceeding. I voted for him twice too. But enough is enough.
 
"Muslim extremists" don't give a flying fuck who gets married here. Domestic partisan hack extremists, that's another story.

Even Muslim extremists know how friggin' spotlight gels work though.

Now me, I want to see the "White House logs" of when the air conditioning went on. Because if it went on before a heat wave, well that shows collusion with the meteorological extremists and demands impeachment.
 
It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...
The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.

And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.

This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.
What is the real point of having discussions with you when you choose to completely ignore facts?

Silhouette always ignores the facts- it is one of her trademarks.

And there is no real discussion with her- she just makes up some bizarre batshit crazy claim and then pretends it is true.

Such as
  • Declaring that the shooter of the black church is gay- and the reason for the shooting was gay marriage
  • That the last Pope was blackmailed to resign by gays
  • And of course- that there was some sort of Konspiracy between the White House, the Supreme Court- and Skylar......
I am sure others can contribute their own favorite Silhouette Konspiracy Kraziness- but those were the first that came to mind.
 
It was touching how POTUS acted first to distance the majority of Americans opposed to gay marriage (polls at this site consistently run close to or at 80% opposed)

You are lying.

The poll did not ask if same sex couples should have equal access to Civil Marriage law. The poll asked if Churches should be forced by law to perform religious wedding ceremonies.


>>>>
 
It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...
The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.....And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.....This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

It was touching how POTUS acted first to distance the majority of Americans opposed to gay marriage (polls at this site consistently run close to or at 80% opposed) from their own Whitehouse; and then to portray (falsely) to our sworn enemies (muslim extremists) "that all Americans are supporting this"...when POTUS knows that the major thorn these extremists cite over and over again...willing to blow themselves up for actually ....is that "the infidels" are depraved as a soceity.

Way to go president Dumbfuck.

I want to see those Whitehouse logs. I want to see when this display first got launched off the ground. We may have an impeachment proceeding. I voted for him twice too. But enough is enough.

You are sill lying about about that poll? The one that doesn't say what you claim it does? Too funny.

You lied yesterday as well when you claimed you were not a Christian despite your home site stating you were and it being riddled with crosses. You are only claiming you are not so you can pretend that your arguments are not Biblical based. They clearly are but you have to lie about it.
 
And in rolls the choir...

You know the old nursery rhyme though... "...all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty together again.."

Neo nursery rhyme:

"The Whitehouse Logs"

Humpy-Dummy rainbow-ed a wall
Humpy-Dummy knew the Court's call
all that was whitewashed, all that was bleached
Couldn't keep Humpy from being impeached.
 
It would not take long to set up the colored lights. There is no need for it to have been done prior to the ruling. Even if it was done prior, all that indications is preparation. As has been pointed out with various examples, people and organizations often set things up, including celebrations, prior to the outcome of an event being known.
There is no reason to think this had to be set up prior to the ruling because adding color to the White House spotlights is a trivial procedure. Even if it were not, or if the bureaucracy involved made it take longer than it should, and the lighting was set up prior to the ruling, only in your gay-hating, conspiracy creating mind is that indicative of some sort of collusion in the USSC voting. Had the ruling gone the other way the colors could simply have been removed...
The arrogance of setting up and testing the lighting before the Ruling would be beyond the pale. Add to that the insult of actually displaying it. Not to mention the danger to national security given that the number one complaint of terrorist muslims citing their main beef with the US is that we are the infidels, depraved, immoral etc. For simple reasons of keeping Americans safe, the proper thing to do would be to have a muted response.....And what does the idiot in the Whitehouse do? Approves of a reckless display of arrogance...as if all Americans support gay marriage. The lie is that a majority of Americans do. And that's why they battled so friggin' hard to keep it from a popular vote.....This was a act of facism. That display might as well have been the nazi flag, for how it represented true democracy. He should just paint a hammer and sickle on the front of the Whitehouse and be done with the formalities.

It was touching how POTUS acted first to distance the majority of Americans opposed to gay marriage (polls at this site consistently run close to or at 80% opposed) from their own Whitehouse; and then to portray (falsely) to our sworn enemies (muslim extremists) "that all Americans are supporting this"...when POTUS knows that the major thorn these extremists cite over and over again...willing to blow themselves up for actually ....is that "the infidels" are depraved as a soceity.

Way to go president Dumbfuck.

I want to see those Whitehouse logs. I want to see when this display first got launched off the ground. We may have an impeachment proceeding. I voted for him twice too. But enough is enough.

If those lights really were the President saying 'fuck you' to violent Muslim extremists- well I would be all for that.
 
And in rolls the choir...

You know the old nursery rhyme though... "...all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty together again.."

Neo nursery rhyme:

"The Whitehouse Logs"

Humpy-Dummy rainbow-ed a wall
Humpy-Dummy knew the Court's call
all that was whitewashed, all that was bleached
Couldn't keep Humpy from being impeached.

Silhouette

If you want to see the White House logs- request them.

Humpty Dumpty is not going to magically deliver them to you.

Not a person here would object to you looking at any White House records normally available to the public to pursue whatever batshit Krazy theory you want to pursue.

And just think- if you have the actual logs- you can cite them- and then lie about what they say!
 
And in rolls the choir...

You know the old nursery rhyme though... "...all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty together again.."

Neo nursery rhyme:

"The Whitehouse Logs"

Humpy-Dummy rainbow-ed a wall
Humpy-Dummy knew the Court's call
all that was whitewashed, all that was bleached
Couldn't keep Humpy from being impeached.

Dumb-tee Humptee sat on the forum,
Ignoring the rigors of factual decorum
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't redefine the fact that it takes fucking twenty minutes to change a half-dozen spotlight gels on lights that are already in place and running every night anyway
..... again.
 
Last edited:
C'mon, it was a funny and accurate rhyme and you know it. Just admit it.

Yeah, accurate.....get back to us after the impeachment. :lol:
Tell you what...we'll both be debating this after the Whitehouse logs are on display showing when this was set up and tested.

Given that your batshit preceded the logs, clearly its not the content of the logs that spawned the batshit.

But hey, give us a few more meaningless predictions about a topic you know nothing about. That's kind of your bread and butter.
 
And in rolls the choir...

You know the old nursery rhyme though... "...all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty together again.."

Neo nursery rhyme:

"The Whitehouse Logs"

Humpy-Dummy rainbow-ed a wall
Humpy-Dummy knew the Court's call
all that was whitewashed, all that was bleached
Couldn't keep Humpy from being impeached.

Not a big fan of President Obama myself, but do you think this is an impeachable offense? Lol. Truly, you have gone off the deep end.
 
And in rolls the choir...

You know the old nursery rhyme though... "...all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn't put Humpty together again.."

Neo nursery rhyme:

"The Whitehouse Logs"

Humpy-Dummy rainbow-ed a wall
Humpy-Dummy knew the Court's call
all that was whitewashed, all that was bleached
Couldn't keep Humpy from being impeached.

Not a big fan of President Obama myself, but do you think this is an impeachable offense? Lol. Truly, you have gone off the deep end.

Sil called the USSC denial of stay to Alabama and act of 'treason' and 'tyranny'.

So yup. He considers that an impeachable offense. There's nothing too batshit on this topic.
 
C'mon, it was a funny and accurate rhyme and you know it. Just admit it.

Yeah, accurate.....get back to us after the impeachment. :lol:
Tell you what...we'll both be debating this after the Whitehouse logs are on display showing when this was set up and tested.

Yeah umm... those "logs" are being flown in from Planet Ycoga4b. You know, the place where it actually takes a week to change a friggin' spotlight gel.
 
C'mon, it was a funny and accurate rhyme and you know it. Just admit it.

Yeah, accurate.....get back to us after the impeachment. :lol:
Tell you what...we'll both be debating this after the Whitehouse logs are on display showing when this was set up and tested.

Maybe you are right. Maybe you are just as right as you were that the USSC would take the Prince's Trust Index into account in their ruling on same sex marriage...... ;)
 
What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.
Ya know, Sil, you might be onto something. For the same reason, I suspected the Super Bowl was fixed. I mean, how else could Patriots have been brandishing caps declaring New England, Super Bowl champs, within minutes of the final whistle??? :ack-1:

What is stupid, however, is your tagine ... Umm ... "homosexuality"...? It's a noun, not a verb. :eusa_doh:

Homosexuality Definition of homosexuality by Merriam-Webster
 
Last edited:
What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.
Ya know, Sil, you might be onto something. For the same reason, I suspected the Super Bowl was fixed. I mean, how else could Patriots have been brandishing caps declaring New England, Super Bowl champs, within minutes of the final whistle??? :ack-1:

What is stupid, however, is your tagine ... Umm ... "homosexuality"...? It's a noun, not a verb. :eusa_doh:

Homosexuality Definition of homosexuality by Merriam-Webster

Hah! I hadn't even noticed that. Be careful Sil or someone might homosexuality you all over the place! Are you uncomfortable when someone is homosexualitying around you? :lmao:
 
What do you know? Another page buried by the usual crowd employing ad hominems and diversion to get people to forget we are talking about the POTUS having foreknowledge (setting up the rainbow lights and testing them in advance) of how the gay marriage Ruling was going to go.
Ya know, Sil, you might be onto something. For the same reason, I suspected the Super Bowl was fixed. I mean, how else could Patriots have been brandishing caps declaring New England, Super Bowl champs, within minutes of the final whistle??? :ack-1:

What is stupid, however, is your tagine ... Umm ... "homosexuality"...? It's a noun, not a verb. :eusa_doh:

Homosexuality Definition of homosexuality by Merriam-Webster

And for that matter -- "race" is a verb too.

bth_CatsRedCarFun.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top