SuperDemocrat
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 8,200
- 868
- 275
- Banned
- #1
I like trump because I think it is really great that every person in this country has the opportunity to be rich. The communist left seems to have a lot of disdain for this idea because if people like the capatalist system because it gives them the chance to have wealth then people might actually become "capatalist". They must keep pissing on this idea because if people believe that a free enterprise system can't help them then they run to the free shit from the government brigade. I can personally think of many mom and pop businesses in the southwest that were started by people who are Hispanic. Who am I to take that away from them?
These people became "rich" and by doing so actually relieves the burden government has in taking care of the less fortunate (assuming such a burden exist). I would think that those who push government programs for the poor would embrace the well off since they never ever require these programs thus lowering the overall,cost of these programs. A case in point is that the cost of unemployment goes down as employment goes up because less people require it. Yet, the left has to piss on that as well to the point where everyone feels that everyone thinks they need it. It's not just for the unfortunate but a right for every American citizen.
Once the capatalist system is shut down where will the government get the money it needs to exist. It has to be taxed from the incomes of people not employed by the government in order for new revenue to come in. No capatalist system no government. A fact to support this conclusion is that government has more revenue during up cycles than during down.
In many ways the socialist stare can't exist without a private sphere that prosperous and the more socialist try to clamp down on the private sphere the more difficult it is for itself to find the revenue it needs to continue. I give you the collapse of the Soviet Union.
These people became "rich" and by doing so actually relieves the burden government has in taking care of the less fortunate (assuming such a burden exist). I would think that those who push government programs for the poor would embrace the well off since they never ever require these programs thus lowering the overall,cost of these programs. A case in point is that the cost of unemployment goes down as employment goes up because less people require it. Yet, the left has to piss on that as well to the point where everyone feels that everyone thinks they need it. It's not just for the unfortunate but a right for every American citizen.
Once the capatalist system is shut down where will the government get the money it needs to exist. It has to be taxed from the incomes of people not employed by the government in order for new revenue to come in. No capatalist system no government. A fact to support this conclusion is that government has more revenue during up cycles than during down.
In many ways the socialist stare can't exist without a private sphere that prosperous and the more socialist try to clamp down on the private sphere the more difficult it is for itself to find the revenue it needs to continue. I give you the collapse of the Soviet Union.
