Texas to arrest Sanctuary City Leaders, Police Chiefs, etc...

[Correll]

I have an example of a rapist that was deported 14 times and then was back in the country to rape a 14 year old child.

I have the fact that a criminal deported 14 times and still in this country committing crimes makes a mockery of the claims of the Left that we do not have an effectively open border.


I have the fact that if that criminal was NOT in this country, because he was unable to return after being deported that that 14 year old American would not have been raped by that sub human animal.


I have your constant and repeated defense of not only the rapist, but the policies that allowed him into the country to rape.


AND I have your refusal to acknowledge, let alone actually address the Rights or Interests of the 14 year old American in question.


You are an enemy of America and Americans.


Your denial is in keeping with your hatred and contempt for US.

recidivism is a problem in any nation-State. American Exeptionalism, is no form of exception to this case.

American Exceptionalism is not relevant here.

A Wall to keep out dangerous foreigners would have protected that young girl and many other victims.

This is the Truth that all your games and evasions are designed to avoid.

Prohibition doesn't work. We need a market friendly solution to our illegal problem. Only the right wing, prefers to "ditch capitalism" at every opportunity, for their socialism on a national basis.

"Prohibition" can certainly work.


Your claim that "we need a market friendly solution to "our" illegal problem" has already been debunked by your own actions, ie your constant and continuing refusal to honestly or seriously discuss the cost benefit of your policy.


You have repeatedly revealed that you simply want to serve the interests of your fellow Mexicans, without regard to the interests of Americans, even American children.

INdeed, you are actively hostile even to American children, being happy to see them raped if it means Mexicans continue to have unfettered, or nearly unfettered access to America.

YOu are a very vile person.

No, it cannot. Prohibition only equals corruption.

Stating something strongly is not an argument.


My point(s) stands.

Alcohol prohibition has the distinction of being a Bad idea in those then modern times, and repealed as a result.

YOu were clear on your point before. REstating your position is not an argument.

My point stands as the last word in absence of any challenge.

Build the fucking wall to protect our people.

 

[danielpalos]

Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.

 

[Correll]

Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.

Depends on what it is.

Certainly you are not against the Prohibition against Murder, for example?

 

[JoeB131]

Right, jobs Americans won't do. Americans will do any job provided the pay makes it worth their labor. The key is not illegals, the key is cutting off illegals forcing industries to pay more and attract Americans workers.

Hey, guy, the thing is, the MARKET won't support Americans getting paid to do the tedious
jobs. I mean, yeah, you could pay lettuce pickers $20.00 an hour, but you wouldn't be able to afford to eat lettuce.

As long as our government gives people a reason not to work or better themselves, they won't. Giving them Obama phones, Obama care, enough food stamps to stay fat on, a HUD home in the suburbs, then what's the point of working?

Except most of the people getting those things already have jobs... just not jobs that pay well enough to make ends meet.

But to a liberal, the answer is not cutting down on social programs, the answer is to allow people to come here and break our laws.

No, the answer is to have an equitable distribution of wealth. You know, like your boss paying for your health care rather than taking expensive Italian vacations.

People are going to come here and break the law as long as there are assholes who are willing to cheat them.

 

[Kondor3]

...And when we start doing that, when it starts to really impact real Americans, who are also paying through the nose because services have become so expensive or aren't being done at all, you are going to get a lot of Americans who will finally realize Undocumented workers aren't that big of a deal...

If, by services, you are referring to things that Illegal Aliens do now, that will become more expensive after we've flushed them back home again...

I, for one, am not in favor of taking advantage of slave labor or near-slave-labor wages, although I seem to recall that Democrats have a long tradition of doing just that...

If we bring them out of the shadows, then they must be paid a Living Wage, and we end-up paying more, but they'll still be here, and that many Americans won't have jobs.

If we send them home, then we must hire Americans to perform those services and pay them a Living Wage, so we still pay more, but to Americans, not Illegals.

I choose the latter.

...Only if you are a mean spirited asshole. Did a Dreamer steal your bike when you were ten?...

Funny stuff, oh Advocate for Illegal Aliens.

Neither they, nor their parents, should be rewarded for their parents' violating American laws and stealing American jobs and depressing American Trade Wages.

...Frankly, what we need to do is stop pandering to your racism. We have always had this underclass of people to do the undesirable jobs and we always will. For us, it's getting someone to do the jobs we don't want to do. For them, it's getting a grip on the bottom rung of a ladder they hope their children can climb. It's a win-win for everyone, except for the racists who live in mortal terror a Mexican will date their daughter.

This is not about racism, although watching you twist and squirm over phony attributions along those lines is funny-as-hell to watch.

This is about The Rule of Law.

This is about both avoiding and reversing precedents, which would otherwise encourage still further waves of invaders to trespass upon American Soil.

This is about having the courage to stand up to LibTard brickbat accusations of racism, and to insist upon the enforcement of US border sovereignty and immigration law.

Was there anything else, snowflake?

 

[WEATHER53]

Americans always did the grunge work and idea they won't has no historical backing and is just an illegals ploy

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hey, guy, the thing is, the MARKET won't support Americans getting paid to do the tedious
jobs. I mean, yeah, you could pay lettuce pickers $20.00 an hour, but you wouldn't be able to afford to eat lettuce.

Really? How many heads of lettuce can one pick in an hours time?

As Kandor pointed out, prices would increase, but I'm willing to pay that price. Americans are too obsessed with the cheapest price, and that's the main reason for outsourcing and turning our heads the other way when it comes to immigrants coming here to work or work and live.

So what happens if farmers can't afford American wages? Then they invest in automation. Again, prices increase, but we would either be paying Americans to do the work, or machines to do the work. Either way, it helps get rid of invaders of our country.

Except most of the people getting those things already have jobs... just not jobs that pay well enough to make ends meet.

And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

No, the answer is to have an equitable distribution of wealth. You know, like your boss paying for your health care rather than taking expensive Italian vacations.

People are going to come here and break the law as long as there are assholes who are willing to cheat them.

Or as long as we have a political party welcoming them.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper? Why would anybody save their money, risk it all and more to open up their own business if they are not going to do much, much better than their employees? Why would anybody work hard and save, make investments, and let the government take most of their profit away so they are only making as much as a working person that didn't take that risk?

People go above and beyond because of the rewards. Let government take those rewards away, there is no reason to do anything in this country but get a job and work for somebody else. And who would want to be that somebody else if there were no rewards to reap?

 

[danielpalos]

Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.

Depends on what it is.

Certainly you are not against the Prohibition against Murder, for example?

Are you referring to morals or civil rights?

 

[JoeB131]

If we bring them out of the shadows, then they must be paid a Living Wage, and we end-up paying more, but they'll still be here, and that many Americans won't have jobs.

If we send them home, then we must hire Americans to perform those services and pay them a Living Wage, so we still pay more, but to Americans, not Illegals.

I choose the latter.

Of course you are, because you are a mean-spirited racist asshole. We got that part.

This is not about racism, although watching you twist and squirm over phony attributions along those lines is funny-as-hell to watch.

This is about The Rule of Law.

This is about both avoiding and reversing precedents, which would otherwise encourage still further waves of invaders to trespass upon American Soil.

This is about having the courage to stand up to LibTard brickbat accusations of racism, and to insist upon the enforcement of US border sovereignty and immigration law.

Was there anything else, snowflake?

Naw, guy, we know you live in mortal terror you'll be replaced by a Mexican... it's about your skill level.

 

[JoeB131]

And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.

 

[Correll]

Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.

Depends on what it is.

Certainly you are not against the Prohibition against Murder, for example?

Are yo

u referring to morals or civil rights?

I'm using YOUR WORDS, and you are pretending to be confused by them?

Stop being a fucko.

My question stands, are you against the Prohibition against Murder?

 

[danielpalos]

And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.

The right prefers to abolish the minimum wage so the poor can "race to the bottom" for less; and help the rich get richer, faster.

 

[danielpalos]

Prohibition is Bad and not Good. It really is that simple, right winger.

Depends on what it is.

Certainly you are not against the Prohibition against Murder, for example?

Are yo

u referring to morals or civil rights?

I'm using YOUR WORDS, and you are pretending to be confused by them?

Stop being a fucko.

My question stands, are you against the Prohibition against Murder?

Red herrings are all the right wing has; not respect for a Tradition of morals or civil rights.

 

[OldLady]

Right, jobs Americans won't do. Americans will do any job provided the pay makes it worth their labor. The key is not illegals, the key is cutting off illegals forcing industries to pay more and attract Americans workers.

Hey, guy, the thing is, the MARKET won't support Americans getting paid to do the tedious
jobs. I mean, yeah, you could pay lettuce pickers $20.00 an hour, but you wouldn't be able to afford to eat lettuce.

As long as our government gives people a reason not to work or better themselves, they won't. Giving them Obama phones, Obama care, enough food stamps to stay fat on, a HUD home in the suburbs, then what's the point of working?

Except most of the people getting those things already have jobs... just not jobs that pay well enough to make ends meet.

But to a liberal, the answer is not cutting down on social programs, the answer is to allow people to come here and break our laws.

No, the answer is to have an equitable distribution of wealth. You know, like your boss paying for your health care rather than taking expensive Italian vacations.

People are going to come here and break the law as long as there are assholes who are willing to cheat them.

Up here in August everyone rakes wild blueberries. It's back breaking but if you're good at it you can earn hundreds of bucks in a day. You work when you feel like it for as long as you feel like it and then you go home. You get paid by the "box," (big box, not a quart sized box) not the hour. The more you rake, the more you make. That's how agricultural work is done, usually. People who get good at it will earn enough to feel its worth it, I think a lot would do it seasonally if we didn't have bazillions of illegals doing it instead. Like the apple harvest, grape harvest, etc. You can work just the weekend or before or after work if the grower doesn't care. Usually every pair of hands is welcome.

 

[danielpalos]

Right, jobs Americans won't do. Americans will do any job provided the pay makes it worth their labor. The key is not illegals, the key is cutting off illegals forcing industries to pay more and attract Americans workers.

Hey, guy, the thing is, the MARKET won't support Americans getting paid to do the tedious
jobs. I mean, yeah, you could pay lettuce pickers $20.00 an hour, but you wouldn't be able to afford to eat lettuce.

As long as our government gives people a reason not to work or better themselves, they won't. Giving them Obama phones, Obama care, enough food stamps to stay fat on, a HUD home in the suburbs, then what's the point of working?

Except most of the people getting those things already have jobs... just not jobs that pay well enough to make ends meet.

But to a liberal, the answer is not cutting down on social programs, the answer is to allow people to come here and break our laws.

No, the answer is to have an equitable distribution of wealth. You know, like your boss paying for your health care rather than taking expensive Italian vacations.

People are going to come here and break the law as long as there are assholes who are willing to cheat them.

Up here in August everyone rakes wild blueberries. It's back breaking but if you're good at it you can earn hundreds of bucks in a day. You work when you feel like it for as long as you feel like it and then you go home. You get paid by the "box," (big box, not a quart sized box) not the hour. The more you rake, the more you make. That's how agricultural work is done, usually. People who get good at it will earn enough to feel its worth it, I think a lot would do it seasonally if we didn't have bazillions of illegals doing it instead. Like the apple harvest, grape harvest, etc. You can work just the weekend or before or after work if the grower doesn't care. Usually every pair of hands is welcome.

it is about economics; harvesting fruit in modern times is not a laissez-fair, affair; mother nature, waits for no one.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.

The right prefers to abolish the minimum wage so the poor can "race to the bottom" for less; and help the rich get richer, faster.

No the minimum wage law is racist , how many times do we have to tell you that?


Just like the federal law against hemp is racist...



Why do you support racist laws still in the year 2017, neanderthal?


.

 

[danielpalos]

And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.

The right prefers to abolish the minimum wage so the poor can "race to the bottom" for less; and help the rich get richer, faster.

No the minimum wage law is racist , how many times do we have to tell you that?

Just like the federal law against hemp is racist...

Why do you support racist laws still in the year 2017, neanderthal?

.

Just until you resort to reason and a valid argument, instead of Red Herrings, right wing fisherman.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And that's the reason they never try to get better paying jobs. As long as they can maintain a low income, they get their government goodies. Take away those government goodies, and people would try harder to increase their income and be better off in the end.

Do you really want to compete against someone willing to work for less than you do now? Because the very fact you can't rate health insurance, I don't think you'd want more people competing for your job. "Yeah, I'll hire Jamal for $5.00 less an hour than Ray. I want to go to Italy next year."

And you'll be hating on Jamal for taking your job.

You want socialism and equity? Then let me ask, why would anybody pay all that money for college if they were only going to make a couple thousand more a year than a floor sweeper?

Becuse they want to broaden their minds? I know this is a concept you don't get.

The right prefers to abolish the minimum wage so the poor can "race to the bottom" for less; and help the rich get richer, faster.

No the minimum wage law is racist , how many times do we have to tell you that?

Just like the federal law against hemp is racist...

Why do you support racist laws still in the year 2017, neanderthal?

.

Just until you resort to reason and a valid argument, instead of Red Herrings, right wing fisherman.

Quit babbling neanderthal, again this is 2017, it's about time we get rid of these racist laws, prohibition against hemp and minimum wage law must go!!!!!!




.

 

[Rambunctious]

Big bust here in CA yesterday. Three bus loads of illegal aliens carted off to jail and deportation.

 

[Rambunctious]

ICE is working all over the sanctuary state of California removing future democrat voters everyday.... and CA can't do shit about it...