Texas to arrest Sanctuary City Leaders, Police Chiefs, etc...

[OKTexas]

While states like California are trying to find ways to defy President Trump by protecting criminal illegals, Texas is on the verge of passing legislation that would hold Mauors, police Ciefs, and other city officials accountable for enabling Sanctuary Cities.

If caught doing so, these coty officials could be SENT TO JAIL for breaking the law and aiding /abetting criminals.

GO, TEXAS! HUA!

Texas prepares to begin locking up leaders in sanctuary cities - Hot Air

"Texas would be the first in which police chiefs and sheriffs could be jailed for not helping enforce immigration law. They could also lose their jobs."

The source AP article says TX has no sanctuary cities, which is a lie. There are several unless they've changed very recently.

The problem is there is no "legal" definition of what a Sanctuary city is. That is the argument the left uses all the time.

At least in TX it appears to be any city that doesn't fully cooperate with ICE. That's the way I've seen the governor explain it and from the AP article it appears that's what is in the bill.

 

[JQPublic1]

This isn't anything new. I'm a truck driver, and the feds have our agencies enforcing FHA laws. Our state troopers pull over trucks not to site them for state violations, but to site us for federal violations. Our state has a seat belt law as a secondary offense. In other words, they can't just pull you over for not wearing a seat belt. But I've been pulled over several times for the same violation because truck drivers have to comply with federal regulations which state they can pull truck drivers over just for not wearing a seat belt.

Wow! You are one confused nerd! Seatbelt laws are solely under state jurisdiction. Yes there are primary and secondary seatbelt enforcement laws which vary by state. And, yes secondary seatbelt laws are only enforced incidental to another traffic violation. If you live in a state with secondary enforcement and you are being pulled over and cited initially for not wearing a seatbelt you need to take it to court. I suspect, though, you are chronically breaking some other state traffic or commerce law...not federal. I challenge you to cite the federal law you were cited for by state police!

 

[Vandalshandle]

While states like California are trying to find ways to defy President Trump by protecting criminal illegals, Texas is on the verge of passing legislation that would hold Mauors, police Ciefs, and other city officials accountable for enabling Sanctuary Cities.

If caught doing so, these coty officials could be SENT TO JAIL for breaking the law and aiding /abetting criminals.

GO, TEXAS! HUA!

Texas prepares to begin locking up leaders in sanctuary cities - Hot Air

"Texas would be the first in which police chiefs and sheriffs could be jailed for not helping enforce immigration law. They could also lose their jobs."

Well, it seems only fair that the feds should return the favor. Will the FBI start giving tickets to speeders on Main Street?

 

[JQPublic1]

You get due process and liberty in Texas. Those sworn to uphold these principles have to be accountable if they do not. No police chief or "leader" defying the law and placing American citizens at risk should be surprised at such a response.

Placing American citizens at risk. What a lie that is. Americans are at greater risk of Americans with guns than they are from illegals.

While no official numbers have been compiled, it's estimated that illegals kill 12 U.S. civilians per day.
That's 4,380 murders per year. Since 9/11, 21,900 U.S. civilians have died because of illegal immigrants.
Let's compare 21,900 to the 2,863 U.S. troops killed in Iraq and 289 total killed in the 5 year Afghanistan campaign.
You do the math.

Who is doing that estimation, Pox News?

 

[danielpalos]

While states like California are trying to find ways to defy President Trump by protecting criminal illegals, Texas is on the verge of passing legislation that would hold Mauors, police Ciefs, and other city officials accountable for enabling Sanctuary Cities.

If caught doing so, these coty officials could be SENT TO JAIL for breaking the law and aiding /abetting criminals.

GO, TEXAS! HUA!

Texas prepares to begin locking up leaders in sanctuary cities - Hot Air

"Texas would be the first in which police chiefs and sheriffs could be jailed for not helping enforce immigration law. They could also lose their jobs."

Just State Socialism from the right wing? Where are the Capital laissez-fair plans, right wingers?

States have no authority over immigration since 1808.

 

[bripat9643]

So much for state rights!

It's the state government, you fucking brainless twit.

 

[bripat9643]

So much for state rights!

That doesn't even make sense considering the topic. lol

Hey, Texas can do what it wants . But the whole fight is state vs fed.

Law says Feds have the say so on immigration. Sanct cities are just going with that .

Sanctuary cities are obstructing federal law, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Let's see, Federal authorities thought a quirky Christian sect was violating the law by legally sending for legal pamphlets that described gunsmithing ways to use rusty old WW2 junk. The Feds interpreted it as a crime and the media drummed up the allegations and president Clinton finally authorized the use of tanks and poison gas to incinerate 80 men, women and children based on ludicrous claims of violating obscure federal laws. Today we have American cities obviously and deliberately violating federal immigration laws and thumbing their noses at the federal government and the MSM seems to support their views during a republican administration..

Waco is, and always will be, 100 percent Koresh's fault. End of story. You can bleat on all you want about the ATF, Koresh decided to do what he did. His fault.

You're a Nazi douche bag. Waco is the FBI and BATF's fault. No one would have been incinerated if they had left Koresh and his people alone. The fact is undeniable.

 

[bripat9643]

So much for state rights!

It's the state doing the prosecuting. I think that's pretty much states rights.

The state can't prosecute counties and municipal governments for not enforcing immigration laws. If they do, the USSC decision on A.L.E.C., the controversial Arizona immigration law, will be put forth as precedent.

There are 5 conservative judges on the Supreme Court now.

 

[candycorn]

Should be fun to watch the GOP sheriffs (about 200 of them) getting arrested by feds and state police.

 

[JQPublic1]

So much for state rights!

It's the state doing the prosecuting. I think that's pretty much states rights.

The state can't prosecute counties and municipal governments for not enforcing immigration laws. If they do, the USSC decision on A.L.E.C., the controversial Arizona immigration law, will be put forth as precedent.

Wrong. What that was about is Arizona creating their own regulations and guidelines. And in fact, the ruling was that Arizona could not create their own immigration laws because that was up to the federal government.

Well......the federal government requires states to report their arrested illegals, and Sanctuary cities refuse to obey that law.

Hmmm! I don't believe states are refusing to turn illegals over to ICE who are paroled after serving time in state institutions for serious crimes.

 

[JQPublic1]

So much for state rights!

It's the state doing the prosecuting. I think that's pretty much states rights.

The state can't prosecute counties and municipal governments for not enforcing immigration laws. If they do, the USSC decision on A.L.E.C., the controversial Arizona immigration law, will be put forth as precedent.

There are 5 conservative judges on the Supreme Court now.

They aren't all like Clarence Thomas. Some have a mind of their own! Like Roberts!

 

[bripat9643]

Should be fun to watch the GOP sheriffs (about 200 of them) getting arrested by feds and state police.

Why would they be arrested?

 

[bripat9643]

So much for state rights!

It's the state doing the prosecuting. I think that's pretty much states rights.

The state can't prosecute counties and municipal governments for not enforcing immigration laws. If they do, the USSC decision on A.L.E.C., the controversial Arizona immigration law, will be put forth as precedent.

Wrong. What that was about is Arizona creating their own regulations and guidelines. And in fact, the ruling was that Arizona could not create their own immigration laws because that was up to the federal government.

Well......the federal government requires states to report their arrested illegals, and Sanctuary cities refuse to obey that law.

Hmmm! I don't believe states are refusing to turn illegals over to ICE who are paroled after serving time in state institutions for serious crimes.

Did you think no one who notice how you qualified the statement so minutely?

 

[bripat9643]

So much for state rights!

It's the state doing the prosecuting. I think that's pretty much states rights.

The state can't prosecute counties and municipal governments for not enforcing immigration laws. If they do, the USSC decision on A.L.E.C., the controversial Arizona immigration law, will be put forth as precedent.

There are 5 conservative judges on the Supreme Court now.

They aren't all like Clarence Thomas. Some have a mind of their own! Like Roberts!

You mean some are quislings?

 

[danielpalos]

So much for state rights!

That doesn't even make sense considering the topic. lol

Hey, Texas can do what it wants . But the whole fight is state vs fed.

Law says Feds have the say so on immigration. Sanct cities are just going with that .

Sanctuary cities are obstructing federal law, moron.

10USC311 is also, federal law, let's tell gun lovers to stop obstructing it.

 

[bodecea]

While states like California are trying to find ways to defy President Trump by protecting criminal illegals, Texas is on the verge of passing legislation that would hold Mauors, police Ciefs, and other city officials accountable for enabling Sanctuary Cities.

If caught doing so, these coty officials could be SENT TO JAIL for breaking the law and aiding /abetting criminals.

GO, TEXAS! HUA!

Texas prepares to begin locking up leaders in sanctuary cities - Hot Air

"Texas would be the first in which police chiefs and sheriffs could be jailed for not helping enforce immigration law. They could also lose their jobs."

Let's see it happen. Should be fun to watch.

 

[bodecea]

So much for state rights!

Indeed.....not illegals' rights. Don't believe me? Ask Mexico about the rights of illegal immigrants violating Mexico's autonomy.

Look! Another person who wants to model how we do things in the U.S. on Mexico!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

This isn't anything new. I'm a truck driver, and the feds have our agencies enforcing FHA laws. Our state troopers pull over trucks not to site them for state violations, but to site us for federal violations. Our state has a seat belt law as a secondary offense. In other words, they can't just pull you over for not wearing a seat belt. But I've been pulled over several times for the same violation because truck drivers have to comply with federal regulations which state they can pull truck drivers over just for not wearing a seat belt.

Wow! You are one confused nerd! Seatbelt laws are solely under state jurisdiction. Yes there are primary and secondary seatbelt enforcement laws which vary by state. And, yes secondary seatbelt laws are only enforced incidental to another traffic violation. If you live in a state with secondary enforcement and you are being pulled over and cited initially for not wearing a seatbelt you need to take it to court. I suspect, though, you are chronically breaking some other state traffic or commerce law...not federal. I challenge you to cite the federal law you were cited for by state police!

The state police are certified by the Feds to enforce federal regulations. In fact, the last two times I was pulled over and asked why, they told me they pulled me over just to check out me and my truck. Perfectly legal.

Truckers don't have constitutional rights. They can pull you over for no reason, look inside of your trailer, look under your hood, and even inside the cab and there is nothing you can do about it. It's happened to me a dozen times or so.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[danielpalos]

Why does the right wing claim Mr. Obama is a hypocrite for being more Capitalist, after leaving public office instead of while being in public office;

or,

10USC311 is also federal law; why does the abominable, right wing, not also want everyone to "keep and bear True Witness" to that federal law?