Testing for all Babyboomer's

[peach174]

Yep, 85 percent have pierced ears or some type of piercing.
So I should think that they want everyone who has done any of above mentioned should go and get tested. Not a certain group.

ATLANTA – For the first time, the government is proposing that all baby boomers get tested for hepatitis C.

I am so getting off of you that you seem to think you are above any of this and have zero risk. Have you lived in a bubble all your life?

I'm not, but to single out babyboomers to me is pretty biased.
I don't have pierced ears because I''m allergic to metal.
I never did manicures because I could and still can't afford afford them.
I never experimented with drugs, because I'm so allergic to many drugs even as a child.
I'm not above anybody else. I have never thought that nor have I ever proposed it.
What I am saying and that you seem to not be getting, is the singling out of a certain group of people.
It should include all people who have done above mentioned things.

 

[syrenn]

Yep, 85 percent have pierced ears or some type of piercing.
So I should think that they want everyone who has done any of above mentioned should go and get tested. Not a certain group.

ATLANTA – For the first time, the government is proposing that all baby boomers get tested for hepatitis C.

I am so getting off of you that you seem to think you are above any of this and have zero risk. Have you lived in a bubble all your life?

I'm not, but to single out babyboomers to me is pretty biased.
I don't have pierced ears because I''m allergic to metal.
I never did manicures because I could and still can't afford afford them.
I never experimented with drugs, because I'm so allergic to many drugs even as a child.
I'm not above anybody else. I have never thought that nor have I ever proposed it.
What I am saying and that you seem to not be getting, is the singling out of a certain group of people.
It should include all people who have done above mentioned things.

How about your family and good friends? Any of them have any risks? What you don't seem to understand it jot s just YOU havering the risk factors.... its everyone you have regular interactions with having them... or of the people you interact with on a regular basis...interacting with anyone having the risk factors.

the problem is that hepC is a sleeper.


I see nothing wrong with singling out the boomers.... or telling any group to get tested.

 

[peach174]

That's what I'm saying .
Everyone who has been exposed to any of the things listed should get tested.
Why doesn't the CDC say everyone should get tested?

 

[jack113]

My state has two native indian casinos and to work at them requires a test for hepatitis C or you are not allowed to work for them. I tested negative and I do not know any employee that tested positive and most casino workers when I worked at one were baby boomers. This nonsense that all baby boomers used drugs, tattoos and piercings is such nonsense and only a scare tactic to sell more unneeded testing.

How many women can anyone name that has not had at least their ears pierced and they do not test positive for the disease.

All Eastern indians test positive for hepatitis C and have to have a stricter blood test than their hired employees to make sure they are not affected.

 

[Trakar]

The Center for Disease Control wants all baby boomer's to get tested for hepatitis C.
What gets me is they are assuming that all of us experimented with drug needles at least once during our life and then suggest that we don't remember it.
One in thirty have the virus, yet they want insurance companies to pay for the test to all 78 million of us.

Facts on how you may have gotten it:

People who are at risk for hepatitis C include:

Peopleborn between 1945 and 1965.
People who had blood transfusions or organ transplants before 1992.
People with tattoos or body piercings.
People who used intravenous drugs, even once.
People who work in a health care setting.
People with HIV.

Seems to me if you never did any of the above, chances are slim to none, that you are not infected and you are one of the 29 who don't have it.
It's the assumption that all baby boomer's fit into this category that really pisses me off.

Not all baby boomer's did needles, not all baby boomer's did piercings or tattoos.

Actually, heterosexual or homosexual intimacies where either partner has blood emissions (even minor unseen tears, cuts or abrasions, not to mention periods) can transfer the virus. Long term monogamous relationships are generally viewed as safe, but anyone who has had a handful (or more) of coupling partners and any casual sex encounters or is in a long term relationship with someone else who had casual sex encounters, should be tested. The test is not expensive and it helps everyone involved regardless of the results.

 

[Kooshdakhaa]

I don't understand...why is it that just baby boomers should get tested?

 

[Kooshdakhaa]

One more freaking thing to worry about that will never come to pass.

If I have one regret in life it is all the things I worried and fussed about that never came to pass.

I was planning to get some bloodwork done this summer, anyway, so I'll get tested. And the only thing I've ever done is get my ears pierced.

So,what the fuck is next? What is the next big to-do going to be about? It never ends.

 

[Kooshdakhaa]

That's what I'm saying .
Everyone who has been exposed to any of the things listed should get tested.
Why doesn't the CDC say everyone should get tested?

Yeah, that's what I'm wondering, too! I've always wanted to have a pedicure, never have in my life. But now I sure as fuck won't.

This is pissing me off.

 

[Trakar]

I don't understand...why is it that just baby boomers should get tested?

I think the main issue is that Baby boomers, even those who are generally healthy, are reaching an age where the long-term effect of even mild chronic viral infection by Hep-C is going to be taking its toll on the Liver, eye-sight, increased arthritis, increased memory loss and all the other impacts of chronic Hep-C infection. By getting ahead of such symptoms and treating proactively they can not only forestall a lot of the complications that often reach an advanced stage long before the person might otherwise seek medical attention for their condition, thinking the symptoms are just normal signs of aging.

 

[Kooshdakhaa]

The Center for Disease Control wants all baby boomer's to get tested for hepatitis C.
What gets me is they are assuming that all of us experimented with drug needles at least once during our life and then suggest that we don't remember it.
One in thirty have the virus, yet they want insurance companies to pay for the test to all 78 million of us.

Facts on how you may have gotten it:

People who are at risk for hepatitis C include:

Peopleborn between 1945 and 1965.
People who had blood transfusions or organ transplants before 1992.
People with tattoos or body piercings.
People who used intravenous drugs, even once.
People who work in a health care setting.
People with HIV.

Seems to me if you never did any of the above, chances are slim to none, that you are not infected and you are one of the 29 who don't have it.
It's the assumption that all baby boomer's fit into this category that really pisses me off.

Not all baby boomer's did needles, not all baby boomer's did piercings or tattoos.

Most women have pierced ears. That is considered a 'body" piercing.
Most people have visited a hospital.... slim chance...but still a risk.
When you have sex with someone.. you are also having sex with every single person they ever slept with and so on and so on....


The important thing is.... most people interact with other people who have one or all of the risk factors. Even if you yourself have none of the risk factors.... you do interact with them... and that is a risk.

But everyone does those things, not just Baby Boomers. So why isn't everyone being told they should get tested?

 

[Kooshdakhaa]

I don't understand...why is it that just baby boomers should get tested?

I think the main issue is that Baby boomers, even those who are generally healthy, are reaching an age where the long-term effect of even mild chronic viral infection by Hep-C is going to be taking its toll on the Liver, eye-sight, increased arthritis, increased memory loss and all the other impacts of chronic Hep-C infection. By getting ahead of such symptoms and treating proactively they can not only forestall a lot of the complications that often reach an advanced stage long before the person might otherwise seek medical attention for their condition, thinking the symptoms are just normal signs of aging.

Kind of sounds like a load of crap, to me. But I'll get tested when I get some other bloodwork done this summer.

I read up about Hepatitis C, and it sounds to me that younger people should be getting tested, not Baby Boomers:

"Of people who get infected with hepatitis C, most develop a long-term (chronic) infection. Usually there are no symptoms. If the infection has been present for many years, the liver may be permanently scarred. This is called cirrhosis. In many cases, there may be no symptoms of the disease until cirrhosis has developed."

So, if I've had hepatitis C for many years, it may be too late for me. But younger people have an opportunity to catch it early. Let THEM get tested.

Still don't understand why Baby Boomers are being told to get tested. Your answer is mainly speculation, not fact.

 

[Ravi]

I don't understand...why is it that just baby boomers should get tested?

Because the government wants baby boomers to die???

 

[alan1]

I don't understand...why is it that just baby boomers should get tested?

Because the government wants baby boomers to die???

Dead baby boomers would make it easier on the social security system.

 

[Ravi]

I don't understand...why is it that just baby boomers should get tested?

Because the government wants baby boomers to die???

Dead baby boomers would make it easier on the social security system.

So why then are they asking them to be tested for a disease that can be cured before it goes too far?

 

[alan1]

Because the government wants baby boomers to die???

Dead baby boomers would make it easier on the social security system.

So why then are they asking them to be tested for a disease that can be cured before it goes too far?

Yer guess is as good as mine.

 

[Meister]

I wonder if we didn't have the onstart of Obamacare if this would even be a discussion.
I'm skeptical of this kind of stuff with what our government is starting to mingle in.

 

[Intense]

The Center for Disease Control wants all baby boomer's to get tested for hepatitis C.
What gets me is they are assuming that all of us experimented with drug needles at least once during our life and then suggest that we don't remember it.
One in thirty have the virus, yet they want insurance companies to pay for the test to all 78 million of us.

Facts on how you may have gotten it:

People who are at risk for hepatitis C include:

Peopleborn between 1945 and 1965.
People who had blood transfusions or organ transplants before 1992.
People with tattoos or body piercings.
People who used intravenous drugs, even once.
People who work in a health care setting.
People with HIV.

Seems to me if you never did any of the above, chances are slim to none, that you are not infected and you are one of the 29 who don't have it.
It's the assumption that all baby boomer's fit into this category that really pisses me off.

Not all baby boomer's did needles, not all baby boomer's did piercings or tattoos.

I suspect the concern is more related to Vaccinations. One step forward, two steps back.

 

[Intense]

I wonder if we didn't have the onstart of Obamacare if this would even be a discussion.
I'm skeptical of this kind of stuff with what our government is starting to mingle in.

It does have that Science-Fiction tone, doesn't it?

 

[Intense]

Are Vaccines Causing More Disease Than They are Curing?



By Alan Cantwell Jr., M.D.

Vaccines help keep us safe from infectious diseases. Smallpox and polio epidemics have been wiped out by mass vaccine programs. People rush to get flu shots every autumn, and kids are bombarded with a barrage of 22 required vaccinations before the age of six. Even pets need their shots. The manufacture of vaccines is a giant industry and what you pay for – inoculations and doctor visits – is big business for pediatricians, family practitioners and veterinarians. So why are more and more people worried about vaccines, especially the ones for kids?

Vaccine-induced Illness

Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Centre, a consumer’s group based in Virginia, USA, claims vaccines are responsible for the increasing numbers of children and adults who suffer from immune system and neurologic disorders, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, asthma, chronic fatigue syndrome, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and seizure disorders. She calls for studies to monitor the long-term effects of mass vaccination and Fisher wants physicians to be absolutely sure these vaccines are safe and not harming people.

No one can deny the dangers of vaccines. The measles, mumps, rubella (German measles) and polio vaccines, all contain live but weakened viruses. Although health officials tell you that polio has been wiped out in the US since 1979, they often fail to mention that all recorded cases of polio since that time are actually caused by the polio vaccine.

Vaccine investigator Neil Z. Miller questions whether we still need the polio vaccine when it causes every new case of polio in the USA. Before mass vaccinations programs began fifty years ago, Miller insists we didn’t have cancer in epidemic numbers, that autoimmune ailments were barely known, and childhood autism did not exist.

Vaccine Contamination

There is also the problem of contamination that has always plagued vaccine makers. During World War II a yellow fever vaccine manufactured with human blood serum was unknowingly contaminated with hepatitis virus and given to the military. As a result, more than 50,000 cases of serum hepatitis broke out among American troops injected with the vaccine.

In the 1960s it was discovered that polio vaccines manufactured in monkey kidney tissue between 1955 and 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus (Simian Virus, number 40). Although this virus causes cancer in experimental animals, health authorities insist it does not cause problems in humans. But evidence of SV40 genetic material has been popping up in human cancers and normal tissue. Researchers are now connecting SV40-contaminated polio vaccines to an increasing number of rare cancers of the lung (mesothelioma) and bone marrow (multiple myeloma). In a 1999 report, SV40 DNA was detected in tissue samples from four children born after 1982. Three were kidney transplant patients, and a fourth had a kidney tumour. Could SV40 be passed on from parents to their children? No one knows for sure.

Covert Vaccine Experiments

Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents’ worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made “high titre” Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), the high-potency experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.

Unbelievably, the measles vaccine caused long-term suppression of the children’s immune system for six months up to three years. As a result, the immunodepressed children died from other diseases in greater numbers than children who had never received the vaccine. Tragically, African girl babies in the experiment were given twice the dose of boys, and therefore suffered a higher death rate. The WHO pulled the vaccine off the market in 1992.

Ironically, the E-Z measles vaccine tested by Kaiser on minority babies was supposed to increase immunity in younger infants. Instead, the vaccine produced the opposite effect. A Los Angeles Times editorial (June 20, 1996) assured readers that “none of the 1,500 was injured by the unlicensed vaccine” and called upon the CDC to ensure that experiments like the E-Z measles vaccine could never occur again.

One wonders how many secret vaccine experiments are conducted by health authorities that never come to the attention of the public. During the two-year measles experiment I was employed by Kaiser and I never knew anything about it until I read the report in The Times five years later, in 1996.

In the poor inner cities across the United States the number of asthma cases is exploding and health officials don’t know why. According to the CDC, 5000 asthma deaths occur annually; and it is estimated that 17.3 million people (4.8 million are children) suffer from the disease, up from 6.7 million in 1980. Asthma usually begins before age 6, and blacks are two to three times more likely to die from asthma than whites. In the Bronx and Harlem sections of New York City, the hospitalisation rate for asthma is 21 times higher than in the more affluent areas of the city.

Could the sharp rise in asthma in poor children be connected with immunosuppression caused by a barrage of vaccines, as well as a lack of quality medical care and insurance, poor diet, and environmental factors? The possible connection of immunosuppressive vaccines to diseases like asthma has never been raised by health officials.

With vaccine experiments frequently performed in Africa and now on black Americans, no wonder one out of every four African-Americans believes AIDS was developed as a genocide program by the US government to exterminate the black population.

But vaccine experiments in the 1990s have not been limited to blacks. Millions of female Mexicans, Nicaraguans and Filipinos have been duped into taking tetanus vaccines, some of which contained a female hormone that could cause miscarriage and sterilisation. In 1995, a Catholic human rights organisation called Human Life International accused the WHO of promoting a Canadian-made tetanus vaccine laced with a pregnancy hormone called human choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG).

Suspicions were aroused when the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in the unusual dose of five multiple injections over a three month period, and recommended only to women of reproductive age. When an unusual number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages after the shots, a hormone additive was uncovered as the cause.

Apparently the WHO has been developing and testing anti-fertility vaccines for over two decades. Women receiving the laced tetanus shot not only developed antibodies to tetanus, but they also developed dangerous antibodies to the pregnancy hormone as well. Without this HCG hormone the growth of the fetus is impaired. Consequently, the laced vaccine served as a covert contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyse the vaccine, the Philippines Medical Association found that 20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines were contaminated with the hormone. Not surprisingly, the WHO has denied all accusations as “completely false and without basis,” and the major media have never reported on the controversy. For further details on this issue, consult the Human Life International website (Pro life - Human Life International).

Newly approved vaccines may also pose serious risks. In October 1999 a vaccine against “rotavirus” infection (which causes most cases of childhood diarrhea) was pulled off the market. One year after the RotaShield vaccine was inoculated into over a million infants, it was found to increase the risk of bowel obstruction. Almost 100 cases of bowel obstruction were reported to the government, and twenty infants developed bowel obstructions within one or two weeks after receiving the vaccine.



http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Articles/Vaccine_Genocide.html

 

[Trakar]

Are Vaccines Causing More Disease Than They are Curing?

A Journal of Alternative News

The promotion of an anti-vax screed does wonders for your credibility, encore!!