Ten years is up.....time to release everyone from Gitmo

Dumbfuck, the US Bill of Rights doesn't apply to foreign animals intent on killing Americans.:cuckoo:

They are just lucky we didn't behead them on the battlefield or cut them in half via torture.

I say here is their trial...we will put them in the back of a C-130 and throw them out the back of the plane at 100 feet over the water and see if they can swim to an island for freedom.

We are a nation of laws. One of our most cherished documents is the Bill of Rights which guarantees the right to a speedy trial, right to see the evidence against you and right to face your accuser

We, as a nation have done none of that and hold men who are "suspected" of being terrorists in indefinite detention. Isn't it time to put up or shut up and either try or release these men?
 
Obamination outlawed the term GWOT, it is now called the OCO.

As for the OCO ending, well Obamination will just declare it's over because he is the Messiah and the muslim world will follow him in his little mind.

The reality is it will never end, just slowly get smaller as middle east countries start to take on the responsibility of babysitting their inbreds that want to blow up innocent people.

If we figure out how to run cars on water, the islamofascists will still bomb us for not allowing them to kill all the Jews. It has nothing to do with oil like leftist shit claims.

Can anybody define how we win (and thus end) the GWOT?
 
Obamination outlawed the term GWOT, it is now called the OCO.

As for the OCO ending, well Obamination will just declare it's over because he is the Messiah and the muslim world will follow him in his little mind.

The reality is it will never end, just slowly get smaller as middle east countries start to take on the responsibility of babysitting their inbreds that want to blow up innocent people.

If we figure out how to run cars on water, the islamofascists will still bomb us for not allowing them to kill all the Jews. It has nothing to do with oil like leftist shit claims.

Can anybody define how we win (and thus end) the GWOT?
They loathe our way of life. They have since the Crusades.

/Story.
 
Obamination outlawed the term GWOT, it is now called the OCO.

As for the OCO ending, well Obamination will just declare it's over because he is the Messiah and the muslim world will follow him in his little mind.

The reality is it will never end, just slowly get smaller as middle east countries start to take on the responsibility of babysitting their inbreds that want to blow up innocent people.

If we figure out how to run cars on water, the islamofascists will still bomb us for not allowing them to kill all the Jews. It has nothing to do with oil like leftist shit claims.

Can anybody define how we win (and thus end) the GWOT?

So for you it's a war that never ends.
 
Uh, you kill your enemy before he can kill you.....that is the standard for conservatives.

You libs are just lucky we have protected your ass from yourselves.

Obamination outlawed the term GWOT, it is now called the OCO.

As for the OCO ending, well Obamination will just declare it's over because he is the Messiah and the muslim world will follow him in his little mind.

The reality is it will never end, just slowly get smaller as middle east countries start to take on the responsibility of babysitting their inbreds that want to blow up innocent people.

If we figure out how to run cars on water, the islamofascists will still bomb us for not allowing them to kill all the Jews. It has nothing to do with oil like leftist shit claims.

Can anybody define how we win (and thus end) the GWOT?

So for you it's a war that never ends.
 
As IF the beheading of Daniel Pearl wasn't enough for you?

You really think appeasin Jhihadists works?

YOU are one of the FIRST they will come for if they are allowed to have thier way.

YOUR problem is that YOU don't recognize the real evil in the world. In your world? Your own countrymen are enemies because they don't agree with your Marxist/Socialist ideals.

Wake up...dumbass.

If any of the detainees in Gitmo were involved in the beheading of Daniel Pearl we should prosecute them immediately

Sorry, but that asshole got a bomb dropped on his ass.....thanks to GWB.

The detainees at Gitmo are guilty of numerous crimes....but none that can be proved. They are prisoners of war....a war they started.

This is not a war against Islam....but the sickness that it breeds in men.

Trust me your honor....they did bad things

I just cant prove it

Will stand up in any court in the world......as long as it is a kangaroo court
 
As IF the beheading of Daniel Pearl wasn't enough for you?

You really think appeasin Jhihadists works?

YOU are one of the FIRST they will come for if they are allowed to have thier way.

YOUR problem is that YOU don't recognize the real evil in the world. In your world? Your own countrymen are enemies because they don't agree with your Marxist/Socialist ideals.

Wake up...dumbass.

If any of the detainees in Gitmo were involved in the beheading of Daniel Pearl we should prosecute them immediately

Sorry, but that asshole got a bomb dropped on his ass.....thanks to GWB.

The detainees at Gitmo are guilty of numerous crimes....but none that can be proved. They are prisoners of war....a war they started.

This is not a war against Islam....but the sickness that it breeds in men.
It's a war on Radical Islam/ists.
 
If any of the detainees in Gitmo were involved in the beheading of Daniel Pearl we should prosecute them immediately

Sorry, but that asshole got a bomb dropped on his ass.....thanks to GWB.

The detainees at Gitmo are guilty of numerous crimes....but none that can be proved. They are prisoners of war....a war they started.

This is not a war against Islam....but the sickness that it breeds in men.

Trust me your honor....they did bad things

I just cant prove it

Will stand up in any court in the world......as long as it is a kangaroo court
They were caught on the field of battle asswipe. But YOU wouldn't know, would you?

And don't insult me with an answer of any kind.
 
When the savages decide to act civil.

Vague answer for a vague war.

You're going to have to do better than that.

If you want a more specific time frame your going to have to ask them. They are the ones with the vest and car bombs.

Define civil.

How long, in your opinion, must these savages be civil before we declare victory and end the war? Or will some form of surrender come along with them becoming civil? If so, who will be surrendering to us?
 
Will the police ever stop arresting even shooting criminals when needed?

There is your answer.

We just decided to hammer the islamic nuts after 9/11 after decades of terrorist attacks on us and others around the world. Eventually they get a bomb on their head if they don't stop.

Vague answer for a vague war.

You're going to have to do better than that.

If you want a more specific time frame your going to have to ask them. They are the ones with the vest and car bombs.

Define civil.

How long, in your opinion, must these savages be civil before we declare victory and end the war? Or will some form of surrender come along with them becoming civil? If so, who will be surrendering to us?
 
Vague answer for a vague war.

You're going to have to do better than that.

If you want a more specific time frame your going to have to ask them. They are the ones with the vest and car bombs.

Define civil.

How long, in your opinion, must these savages be civil before we declare victory and end the war? Or will some form of surrender come along with them becoming civil? If so, who will be surrendering to us?

Are you serious? I have to define civil for you?

Them acting civilized would consist of them not blowing up innocence in the name of JIHAD.
 
Will the police ever stop arresting even shooting criminals when needed?

There is your answer.

We just decided to hammer the islamic nuts after 9/11 after decades of terrorist attacks on us and others around the world. Eventually they get a bomb on their head if they don't stop.

If you want a more specific time frame your going to have to ask them. They are the ones with the vest and car bombs.

Define civil.

How long, in your opinion, must these savages be civil before we declare victory and end the war? Or will some form of surrender come along with them becoming civil? If so, who will be surrendering to us?

Yes. Never ending war for you. You made that clear already.
 
If you want a more specific time frame your going to have to ask them. They are the ones with the vest and car bombs.

Define civil.

How long, in your opinion, must these savages be civil before we declare victory and end the war? Or will some form of surrender come along with them becoming civil? If so, who will be surrendering to us?

Are you serious? I have to define civil for you?

Them acting civilized would consist of them not blowing up innocence in the name of JIHAD.

How long of a time period of them not doing that is acceptable to you before we should declare the war over?
 
I agree they are not citizens and do not have the rights of that are afforded to American citizens, however why can we not try them and either imprison or release them. This is not the first time we have detained enemy combatants but I believe it is the first time we have simply held them. During any wartime action enemy combatants are captured but its high time we do something with them. We are pulling out of both combat theatres and victory was declared long ago try these combatants and punish them according to the verdict.
 
Define civil.

How long, in your opinion, must these savages be civil before we declare victory and end the war? Or will some form of surrender come along with them becoming civil? If so, who will be surrendering to us?

Are you serious? I have to define civil for you?

Them acting civilized would consist of them not blowing up innocence in the name of JIHAD.

How long of a time period of them not doing that is acceptable to you before we should declare the war over?

It's a moot point as you and I both know they won't stop. As far as I'm concerned we should pull out of Afghanistan and use our air power to bomb any suspected terrorist camp on site. But I'm not in control so what I think really doesn't matter.
 
Are you serious? I have to define civil for you?

Them acting civilized would consist of them not blowing up innocence in the name of JIHAD.

How long of a time period of them not doing that is acceptable to you before we should declare the war over?

It's a moot point as you and I both know they won't stop. As far as I'm concerned we should pull out of Afghanistan and use our air power to bomb any suspected terrorist camp on site. But I'm not in control so what I think really doesn't matter.

Is the possibility of a terrorist attack reason enough for our country to be in a constant state of war or with these strikes on an as needed basis can the whole "war" label and all that comes with it be dropped?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top