Ten Year Anniversary

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by rayboyusmc, Jan 17, 2008.

  1. rayboyusmc
    Offline

    rayboyusmc Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    4,015
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +338
    I believe today is the ten year anniversary of the news of Monica Gate.

    Questions that need to be answered:

    1. Should Clinton have been impeached and convicted for his perjury about "sexual relations" with the intern?

    2. Should Clinton have had the balls to say, "It's none of your frigging busines what I do with my wee wee. It's between me, my BJer and my wife.

    3. Should we have continued the Whitewater Investigation, which found no legal infractions by the Clintons, into the BJ Affair and spent 70 million of our tax dollars looking for the stained blue dress.

    4. Should we now spend 70 million to have a special investigator look at what George has done in his tour, or should we just believe him when he says the Dems are wasting their time in investigations?

    5. Should Scooter have had his sentence commuted before serving any time for having perjured himself about outing a "covert" CIA operative.


    What ever you believe, HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

    [​IMG]
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    So many outright ignorant statements here.

    The biggest is that somehow Clinton was hounded for just having consentual sex. Lets recap shall we? He was accused of using his Office of Governer to procure employees and forcing them to have sex with him by threatening their jobs. He tried to us his position as President to prevent ever having to answer the charge. He lost that shell game and had to LEGALLY provide information in the charge.

    Having sex with employees as President most definately is an appropriate avenue to pursue in that case. He knew it and chose to LIE to a sitting Judge while under oath. The impeachment proceedings where about him LYING to a Judge under oath and only relate to sex in that that happened to be what he was lying about.

    And he was guilty as charged of lying under oath to a Judge. He has admitted it.

    And remind me again how many minutes Clinton spent in jail for suborning perjury and committing perjury? Then remind me of how the millions he got from the x wife of a criminal had nothing to do with his back door pardon just before he left office. Scooter was a decision by a sitting President for a pardon. You want to complain about it? Then we get to complain about all the pardons that stank under Clinton.

    Have a nice day.


    Ohh ya just curious, if your a retired Marine, what rank and MOS? I have a theory and I want to see if in this case it applies.
     
  3. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,555
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,432
    1. No.

    2. Yes.

    3. No.

    4. Depends on the investigation. If it's leading toward an impeachment, not really interested.

    5. No. An olympic athelete just got put away for six months for doing far less than Scooter did.

    As an aside, the deposition at which Clinton was less than truthful, took place in the context of the Paula Jones matter -- the only civil litigation I know of that was allowed to proceed against a sitting president during his term of office. Generally, such actions were stayed during such term and were allowed to proceed after. It was thought to be a matter of not interfering with national business over issues that had no public effect.

    But the Supremes didn't feel constrained by precedent... kind of like Bush v Gore.
     
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    You mean the Liberal court sided against Clinton? Who would have thunk it.
     
  5. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,555
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,432
  6. Shogun
    Offline

    Shogun Free: Mudholes Stomped

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    30,495
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    1,043
    Ratings:
    +2,260
    DOH!

    :clap2:
     
  7. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    Where are they now?


    You actually care? Well she slings her biography "Monica's Story" about right and become a spokeswoman for diet company Jenny Craig

    In April, 2003 she hosted of the "reality" series Mr. Personality.

    Reader Mimi Adams reports that in December 2003 her application to be reimbursed $1.1 Million in her legal fees for the Starr inquiry by the American taxpayer was denied (however the taxpayer will foot the bill for Linda Tripp's lawsuit settlement).

    in December 2006, Lewinsky graduated with a master's degree in Social Psychology from the London School of Economics[9] where she had been studying since September 2005.[10] Her dissertation was entitled “In Search of the Impartial Juror: An exploration of the third person effect and pre-trial publicity.”
     
  8. rayboyusmc
    Offline

    rayboyusmc Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    4,015
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +338
    Liberal judges are bad, conservative judges are good?:eusa_wall:


    Is it an ignorant statement to make a statement that isn't true? Where did I say he was hounded for just having sex? My view is quite the opposite. He was hounded because he was Clinton and there are a part of the right wing who hates and fears Clinton. They are still doing it today with Hillary. Rove is back to his old games.

    What started out as a Whitewater investigation, turned into a fishing expedition by Starr. Eventually the got him for perjury about a blow job. I personally think he was wrong as a leader and a husband to let Monica play taps on his wee wee, but that was his business not mine or yours. That is not saying what you state above.

    His failure was that when caught in a corner, he didn't tell them all to screw off. He failed and he lied.

    My point about Scooter is that he was involved in a act the involved treasonous behavior. Revealing the identity of a covert agent in the CIA is a crime far more serious than a lie about a blow job.


    As to your question. LtCol, 21 years, 8 months and 3 days. 7562.

    I have a theory about a person's ability to assimilate new data that may conflict his or her current value system. It however has nothing to do with rank or MOS. Authoritarian conservative personality types, like the kinds described by John Dean, "Conservatives Without Conscience" do not deal well with change.

    Actually, there were no statements. Only questions, Gunny.
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    She was not a Covert agent. And he was NEVER tried or convicted on such a charge. In fact the person that actually "outed" her was given a free pass. He was tried on the crime of Perjury, just as Billy should have been. In the case of Clinton we KNOW he lied and he walked clear on the charge. Scooter got 2 and a half years and never admitted to perjury, he argued he simply forgot certain things, which is evident in his statements to the special Prosecutor. Scooter was hounded illegally for 2 years before perjury was charged against him, go read the law, one can NOT conduct an investigation in the manner his was conducted on the sole charge of Perjury.

    And you do fit my theory. But then I suspected as much already.
     
  10. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    I AM MUCH MORE CONCERNED WITH THIS ADMITTED LIE ..LISTEN TO HOW HIM AND HIS CRONIES CHUCKLE OVER HOW HE DECEIVED THE DUMBED DOWN VOTERS.....

    Dick Cheney ex-director of CFR talks to David Rockefeller

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg[/ame]

    cheney you make me sick you fucking socialist scumbag leech !!!!!
     

Share This Page