Should US Tanker Fleet Contract Be Given To Airbus?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Annie, Jan 16, 2008.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Links at site:

    http://www.blackfive.net/main/2008/01/can-we-risk-all.html

     
  2. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,179
    Thanks Received:
    4,680
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,122
    Absolutely not.
     
  3. onedomino
    Offline

    onedomino SCE to AUX

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Thanks Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +476
    Rumsfeld tried to lease 767s from Boeing to avoid this bid. Regardless, I think it very unlikely the order will go to EADS. If it does, there will be a huge storm. No, the US will never pay tens of billions to the French and Germans for EADS aircraft unless there is some other gigantic payoff, perhaps political. No administration could handle the political heat of signing the EADS contract. In the end, EADS will drive down the price Boeing can obtain, and that may be maladaptive, depending on the surviving margin.
     
  4. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,590
    Thanks Received:
    4,856
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,450
    But it's considered perfectly fine to sell 10 billion dollars worth of arms to Saudi Arabia?
     
  5. midcan5
    Offline

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    10,795
    Thanks Received:
    2,367
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +3,306
    No. This is the one area my economist friends chide me on, even my bicycles are made in the USA. I feel like we are in this together and when possible we support each other.
     
  6. watermark
    Offline

    watermark Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    160
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +7
  7. watermark
    Offline

    watermark Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    160
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +7
    Well, what if Oregon weren't part of America? Would it suddenly be bad to trade with them? If Ottawa were part of America, would it be good to trade with them? I just don't really see the difference.
     
  8. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    What's with the Os?

    Living in Oregon, I can tell you honestly...it almost isn't part of the US.
     
  9. watermark
    Offline

    watermark Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    160
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +7
    That's all good. Mississippi isn't part of the US at all.
     
  10. onedomino
    Offline

    onedomino SCE to AUX

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Thanks Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +476
    Yes, it is. The two situations are not comparable. Anyway, this time around the Saudis are buying Euro fighters, not US fighters, probably because the US refuses to sell the full capabilities of even its second tier fighters to to countries like Saudi Arabia. The F-15s owned by Saudi Arabia, for example, are missing the most advanced radar, etc. Besides, Paulitics, Saudi Arabia manufactures no aircraft, while the US does make anything made by EADS and more.
     

Share This Page