Ten Things the Ebola Crisis Tells Us About the Obola Administration

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
Hope and Change alright. Protect yourselves all you who put this incompetent idiot in as President.

SNIP:
What a shock: faced with a crisis that could demolish the Democrats in the coming midterm elections and permanently cripple his post-election plans to continue “fundamental transformation,” President Obama has done the only thing he knows how to do — seek a political solution to get him past Nov. 4, in the hopes that he can fool the American public one last time.

The announcement of Ron Klain as the new Ebola “czar” checks all the boxes: Harvard Law, longtime Democrat party op, veteran of the Clinton, Al Gore and John Kerry campaigns. The problem is, it checks all the wrong boxes. The Progressive myth is that we ought to have a government of experts — top men! — to handle the nation’s problems in a calm, deliberative manner. The reality is that we have a nation of unscrupulous lawyers, amoral apparatchiks and political hacks whose only area of expertise is manipulating the electoral and governmental systems and getting rich by doing so.
I mean, does this make you feel confident?
After learning this week that an infected nurse had traveled by air, Mr. Obama scrapped most of his schedule in favor of meetings with top national security and public health officials. While praising their work to date on Ebola, the president said they had full plates — including the fight against the Islamic State and the onset of flu season — and another person might be needed “just to make sure that we are crossing all the t’s and dotting all the i’s going forward.”
Mr. Klain will report directly to Lisa Monaco, Mr. Obama’s homeland security adviser, and Susan E. Rice, his national security adviser, the official said.
Islamic State, the flu season, a lethal virus hitherto confined to Africa — just another day at the office for President Golf n’ Fund-raise. What this appointment — made only under duress, and purely for political reasons, since there is absolutely nothing Ron Klain personally can do to stop the spread of the Ebola virus now that the barn doors at our borders and airports have been left wide open for ideological reasons — tells us is this:

Not Ron Klain, left; but Spacey did play him in a movie


ALL TEN of them here:
Unexamined Premises Ten Things the Ebola Crisis Tells Us About the Obola Administration
 
What did the AIDS epidemic say about Reagan?
Stupidest post I've seen today goes to Stephie.

Reagan's AIDS Legacy / Silence equals death

Reagan s AIDS Legacy Silence equals death - SFGate
"""Following discovery of the first cases in 1981, it soon became clear a national health crisis was developing. But President Reagan's response was "halting and ineffective," according to his biographer Lou Cannon. Those infected initially with this mysterious disease -- all gay men -- found themselves targeted with an unprecedented level of mean-spirited hostility.

A significant source of Reagan's support came from the newly identified religious right and the Moral Majority, a political-action group founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell. AIDS became the tool, and gay men the target, for the politics of fear, hate and discrimination. Falwell said "AIDS is the wrath of God upon homosexuals." Reagan's communications director Pat Buchananargued that AIDS is "nature's revenge on gay men.""""

"""Reagan would ultimately address the issue of AIDS while president. His remarks came May 31, 1987 (near the end of his second term), at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington. When he spoke, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases."""
 
Last edited:
What did the AIDS epidemic say about Reagan?
Stupidest post I've seen today goes to Stephie.

Reagan's AIDS Legacy / Silence equals death

Reagan s AIDS Legacy Silence equals death - SFGate
"""Following discovery of the first cases in 1981, it soon became clear a national health crisis was developing. But President Reagan's response was "halting and ineffective," according to his biographer Lou Cannon. Those infected initially with this mysterious disease -- all gay men -- found themselves targeted with an unprecedented level of mean-spirited hostility.

A significant source of Reagan's support came from the newly identified religious right and the Moral Majority, a political-action group founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell. AIDS became the tool, and gay men the target, for the politics of fear, hate and discrimination. Falwell said "AIDS is the wrath of God upon homosexuals." Reagan's communications director Pat Buchananargued that AIDS is "nature's revenge on gay men.""""

"""Reagan would ultimately address the issue of AIDS while president. His remarks came May 31, 1987 (near the end of his second term), at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington. When he spoke, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases."""
Staph's posts are always good for a chuckle. Never an original thought, and atrocious grammar and spelling whenever she actually makes an attempt at typing a sentence on her own. Classic nutter.
 
I thought you people didn't want the federal government to get between a patient and his doctor?

Now it seems you want the federal government in total control of American healthcare, and it's Obama's fault if it isn't.
 
Jesus, this Ebola hype is ridiculous. Though that's par for the course for the American sheeple populace. All fear the boogety man!
 
Jesus, this Ebola hype is ridiculous. Though that's par for the course for the American sheeple populace. All fear the boogety man!

It's the media's desperation to find something they can sensationalize into a story that people will listen to.

To cable news and other media news outlets, a news story is just like an idea for a tv show. Can we turn it into something people will watch? How long a run do we think we can get out of it?
 
What did the AIDS epidemic say about Reagan?
Stupidest post I've seen today goes to Stephie.

Reagan's AIDS Legacy / Silence equals death

Reagan s AIDS Legacy Silence equals death - SFGate
"""Following discovery of the first cases in 1981, it soon became clear a national health crisis was developing. But President Reagan's response was "halting and ineffective," according to his biographer Lou Cannon. Those infected initially with this mysterious disease -- all gay men -- found themselves targeted with an unprecedented level of mean-spirited hostility.

A significant source of Reagan's support came from the newly identified religious right and the Moral Majority, a political-action group founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell. AIDS became the tool, and gay men the target, for the politics of fear, hate and discrimination. Falwell said "AIDS is the wrath of God upon homosexuals." Reagan's communications director Pat Buchananargued that AIDS is "nature's revenge on gay men.""""

"""Reagan would ultimately address the issue of AIDS while president. His remarks came May 31, 1987 (near the end of his second term), at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington. When he spoke, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases."""
Staph's posts are always good for a chuckle. Never an original thought, and atrocious grammar and spelling whenever she actually makes an attempt at typing a sentence on her own. Classic nutter.

and you're a classic hater. I suppose you call your post an original thought? Any snob can repeat that insult
 
I thought you people didn't want the federal government to get between a patient and his doctor?

Now it seems you want the federal government in total control of American healthcare, and it's Obama's fault if it isn't.

LMAO...conflation, distortion and willful mis characterization...the perfect tri fecta for a lying partisan.
Your desperation before the election is almost palpable at this point.
 
You love how they had to go dig Reagan.

Obamabots are just so cute
 
This should give you all the warm fuzzies. you voted for him. lol

SNIP:

Putting the ‘O’ in EbOla
Will the bungled Ebola response poke a hole in liberals’ theory of infallible government?
By Jonah Goldberg



pic_giant_newsite_101714_obama-ebola_920.jpg

President Obama is updated on a new Ebola case, October 12, 2014. (Getty/Pool)
Print
Text
Comments
406
Jonah Goldberg
EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays.
Dear Reader (especially self-monitoring readers overjoyed that Ronald Klain has been named Supreme Allied Commander in the War on Ebola. What could go wrong?),
This will be the single greatest “news”letter of all time. It will make you laugh. It will make you cry. Pathos, logos, and ethos will leap into the San Diego Zoo bear pit of your mind and shout “Bear Fight!” When it is over, you will feel like you kissed your long-lost love both goodbye and hello at a Paris train station. You’ll be rested, as if you just woke from a nap by a waterfall using a panda bear’s belly as a pillow. While it’s not true we only use 10 percent of our brains, you will feel like that had been the case up until now. You’ll be able to cook twelve-minute brownies in seven minutes. You will never have to eat kale again. This will make total sense to you. Suddenly, whether asked to train cats to use a human toilet or use a semicolon correctly, you’ll say, “Of course, a child could do it.”
Advertisement
Now, even grading on my own curve, this was a remarkably stupid paragraph to write. The first rule of writing is “Sacrifice a bull to Crom before you start typing” (“Is that what we’re calling it now?” — The Couch). No, the first rule of writing is that there is no first rule, save perhaps “Always write in the language of your intended reader.”

ALL of it here:
Putting the O in EbOla National Review Online
 
Jesus, this Ebola hype is ridiculous. Though that's par for the course for the American sheeple populace. All fear the boogety man!

Would you ride in a car/plane with someone who has ebola?
Would you invite them into your house to meet the family?

o_0

I wouldn't invite someone into my house if they had the flu. That does not mean we should all jump up in an absurd panic about the flu, based on misinformation and political slander.
 
Jesus, this Ebola hype is ridiculous. Though that's par for the course for the American sheeple populace. All fear the boogety man!

Would you ride in a car/plane with someone who has ebola?
Would you invite them into your house to meet the family?

o_0

I wouldn't invite someone into my house if they had the flu. That does not mean we should all jump up in an absurd panic about the flu, based on misinformation and political slander.
We aren't talking about the flu, though..Why are you trying to cause a distraction?

I see your agenda, though...to the leftists, discussing a 3rd world disease that there is no cure for, and is now in america due to lax border security is "misinformation" and "political slander".
 

Forum List

Back
Top