At least you tried. You found an article from 2015 that gives some numbers. That's a start. Your problem, however, is that the richest group they address only makes 9M/year. That's a far cry from the billionaires you touted, and attacking that group doesn't generate anywhere near enough revenue to eliminate the deficit, much less the debt itself. Keep trying.Show how much additional revenue you could generate by taxing the super wealthy more. If you would at least do that, I might believe you've actually thought this through instead of relying on feelz.even when it becomes obvious your prescription won't do what you claim it will do.
No its obvious that lowering taxes will generate more federal revenues to combat the debt.
Now that's an ignorant prescription.
This article supports taxing the wealthy more will increase revenues.
What Could Raising Taxes on the 1% Do? Surprising Amounts
Yeah thats just feelings.
You're clueless.
If we had a 91% top tax bracket like in the 1950s we could start eliminating the debt year by year.
Why wasn't the debt already eliminated when we had a 91% bracket?