Tax cut question for the resident Republitards

[Bass v 2.0]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

 

[Rozman]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

I say again.....Use what's left of the Stimulus money,It's not working anyway......

 

[California Girl]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

I argue for an extension of the current tax rate for ALL Americans.... because that is fair. It is not fair to punish one group and reward another - particularly if you are rewarding those who contribute nothing.

If the Government wants to do something, they should pay for it. I have to.

 

[The T]

Just keep up the class warfare. That's all the left have remaining in their bag of tricks to maintain their divisive agenda. Divide and conquer.

 

[The T]

This crap is getting old.

 

[Intense]

Damn Commies can never get enough of others people's goods. Bass you need to get your head out of your ass.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

I argue for an extension of the current tax rate for ALL Americans.... because that is fair. It is not fair to punish one group and reward another - particularly if you are rewarding those who contribute nothing.

If the Government wants to do something, they should pay for it. I have to.

Are you hard of reading or just plain damn illiterate? I asked specifically how should the tax cuts get paid for, not your claptrap about whats fair. Try answering following specifically the question in the OP, only one Republitard bothered to give an answer.

 

[Truthmatters]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

I say again.....Use what's left of the Stimulus money,It's not working anyway......

You're the only who replied with a valid answer, I salute your ability to answer rightfully while the others just trolling, moan and provide ad hominems. My reply to you would be that the stimulus money did work, it saved jobs that would have been lost, furthermore its the responsibility of those being given the stimulus money to make that money work, if your argument is that stimulus money shouldn't go to incompetent people who can't make it work for the better, I agree, but for the most part the money did help.

 

[Full-Auto]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

How do you intend to pay for the three trillion dollar tax cut you want?

 

[Bass v 2.0]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

Considering that most people in the country are well within this range why are Republitards for tax cuts that will benefit a minority of people that control most of the wealth anyways?

 

[Full-Auto]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

Considering that most people in the country are well within this range why are Republitards for tax cuts that will benefit a minority of people that control most of the wealth anyways?

How do you intend to pay for it?

 

[WillowTree]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

You want to pay for illegals, for the education, for their food for their medical care and for their college. You stfu.

 

[Truthmatters]

http://pages.uoregon.edu/vburris/oldmoney.pdf

the 1% are republicans by a 70% margin.

 

[WillowTree]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

Considering that most people in the country are well within this range why are Republitards for tax cuts that will benefit a minority of people that control most of the wealth anyways?

When 100% of Americans pay FEDERAL INCOME TAX we'll talk. Til then the 50% of you leeches will just have to keep drooling over the rich man's money. Makes you nothing less than a thief.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

Considering that most people in the country are well within this range why are Republitards for tax cuts that will benefit a minority of people that control most of the wealth anyways?

How do you intend to pay for it?

If it was up to me me I'd tax crap like cigarettes, alcohol and fast food, and pornographic materials.

 

[Intense]

Here are 10 commission suggestions where agreement remains possible:

1. Reduce the budgets for Congress and the White House by 15 percent.

Yes, it's largely symbolic. But there's no better place for Congress to start saving money. That would save $800 million by 2015 - not big money by congressional standards but not chicken salad, either. "In order to tackle our impending fiscal crisis, everyone must sacrifice - especially Washington," the report stated. If Congress, which upped its own spending by 4 percent last year, doesn't do an immediate turnaround, there's not much hope for getting lawmakers to make the tough decisions.

Yes, it's largely symbolic. But there's no better place for Congress to start saving money. That would save $800 million by 2015 - not big money by congressional standards but not chicken salad, either. "In order to tackle our impending fiscal crisis, everyone must sacrifice - especially Washington," the report stated. If Congress, which upped its own spending by 4 percent last year, doesn't do an immediate turnaround, there's not much hope for getting lawmakers to make the tough decisions.

2. Cap discretionary spending through 2020.

This is the commission's first recommendation and one that could find its way into law as long as the operative word is "cap" spending, and not "freeze" or "reduce" it. As they say in business school, bending the cost curve and reducing the rate of government growth could cut the deficit by $1.8 trillion over 10 years.

This is the commission's first recommendation and one that could find its way into law as long as the operative word is "cap" spending, and not "freeze" or "reduce" it. As they say in business school, bending the cost curve and reducing the rate of government growth could cut the deficit by $1.8 trillion over 10 years.

3. Reduce the size of the federal workforce.

We can argue about how big a cut is justified, but it would be easy to continue to shrink the federal workforce, which actually is smaller now than it was in the late 1960s (if you don't count the military). Whether it's through attrition or buyouts, it could save $13 billion within five years, according to the commission.

4. Eliminate military weapons systems and programs that the Pentagon does not want.

Congress might not be able to muster a majority vote to cut Pentagon spending as sharply as it does social safety-net programs for the middle class and poor - but it may be able to hold the line on military programs the Pentagon says it doesn't want or need. The military-industrial complex has supporters (and jobs) spread around the country in numerous congressional districts, but it should be easier to cut unwanted military projects than those the Pentagon views as vital to national security.

Congress might not be able to muster a majority vote to cut Pentagon spending as sharply as it does social safety-net programs for the middle class and poor - but it may be able to hold the line on military programs the Pentagon says it doesn't want or need. The military-industrial complex has supporters (and jobs) spread around the country in numerous congressional districts, but it should be easier to cut unwanted military projects than those the Pentagon views as vital to national security.

5. Reduce duplicate government programs.

The commission reported that Washington "funds more than 44 job-training programs across nine different federal agencies, at least 20 programs at 12 agencies dedicated to the study of invasive species, and 105 programs meant to encourage participation in science, technology, education, and math." By reducing duplication, the government could save $100 billion over 10 years, the commission concluded. Seems like a no-brainer.

6. Force government agencies to make their own cuts.

Instead of the current top-down budget process, the commission recommends that all federal agency heads "should be required to identify a share of their budget recommended for cancellation and to identify ways to shift from inefficient, unproductive spending to productive, results-based investment." Sounds like a good start.

7. Budget honestly for natural disasters.

It's one of Washington's dirty secrets. Congress doesn't budget properly for federal costs of dealing with catastrophic events. Instead, lawmakers send what seems to be unlimited assistance to states and local governments that feel entitled to have Uncle Sam cover their costs. The commission recommended creating an explicit disaster relief fund with "stricter parameters for the use of these funds." States might complain - then again, aren't they asking Washington to give them more responsibilities?

8. Create a mechanism to enforce deficit-reduction targets.

If you're old enough to remember the 1985 Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit-reduction law, you might recall that it required across-the-board spending cuts if Congress did not meet agreed-upon deficit targets with specific spending reductions or tax increases. The new report says that some mandatory enforcement mechanism is needed. It could be on its way.

9. Enact medical malpractice reform.

Another oldie-but-goodie. Economists say that doctors spend huge amounts of money on both malpractice insurance and costly "defensive medicine" procedures designed primarily to reduce their liability. There is at least modest bipartisan support for malpractice reform, and with Republicans gaining control of the House, it seems likely to happen in 2011. This would reduce government health-care expenses by $17 billion over the decade.

10. Close business tax loopholes.

Republicans may agree to eliminate certain tax incentives used by American corporations as part of a deal for extending Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The energy industry might be among the businesses getting nicked. Domestic drilling incentives are among those proposed for the chopping block.

10 deficit panel proposals with best chances of becoming law | National | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

 

[Bass v 2.0]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

Considering that most people in the country are well within this range why are Republitards for tax cuts that will benefit a minority of people that control most of the wealth anyways?

When 100% of Americans pay FEDERAL INCOME TAX we'll talk. Til then the 50% of you leeches will just have to keep drooling over the rich man's money. Makes you nothing less than a thief.

Among that percentage that aren't paying are rich people who get out of taxes, the poor can't pay taxes with money they don't have.

 

[The T]

the tax cuts up to 250,000 is for ALL people.

If you make 3billion this year you still get the first 250,000 at the same rate as everyone else.

Considering that most people in the country are well within this range why are Republitards for tax cuts that will benefit a minority of people that control most of the wealth anyways?

When 100% of Americans pay FEDERAL INCOME TAX we'll talk. Til then the 50% of you leeches will just have to keep drooling over the rich man's money. Makes you nothing less than a thief.

And whiners whom drool over using the imperial FED to get their way.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

You idiots keep arguing for tax cuts for the rich, my question is how do you want to pay for them and with what? If you answer is to cut social programs for the poor to pay for tax cuts for the rich please provide justification for it, otherwise shut up with your ridiculous circular arguments you keep making ad naseum.

You want to pay for illegals, for the education, for their food for their medical care and for their college. You stfu.

When did I say that I'm all for paying for illegals you stupid Republitard? I'm for taking care of Americans first and foremost above anything and the way how Republitards support outsourcing jobs by companies is even worse than what you suggested.