Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
/——/ Debunked a 100 timesit's the way it always works out. it's the little secret dems hate so much and why they are always against them.
No, actually it does not, that is just a GOP myth.
The 5 years prior to the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased at an average of 15% per year. The 5 years after the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6% per year.
to this day, there hasn't been one politician to say what is a fair share. not one. They've been spewing that for fking ever. Not once explained what it means other than it sounds nice off their tongue.I'm getting two hundred a month more. that's yuge.You mean CNSNews, the far right news blog? That is where you link goes
Oops, we'll have to let them know too. I should have known CBS wouldn't report on a story like that.
Employers had till Feb 15th to implement the withholding changes and I do not know anyone that saw a change before the 20th, a lot of people I know didn’t see the change till the start of Feb
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
Liberals will be along shorty to inform you the rich...blah blah corporations...blah blah and how you should have voted for Hillary.
to this day, there hasn't been one politician to say what is a fair share. not one. They've been spewing that for fking ever. Not once explained what it means other than it sounds nice off their tongue.I'm getting two hundred a month more. that's yuge.Oops, we'll have to let them know too. I should have known CBS wouldn't report on a story like that.
Employers had till Feb 15th to implement the withholding changes and I do not know anyone that saw a change before the 20th, a lot of people I know didn’t see the change till the start of Feb
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
Liberals will be along shorty to inform you the rich...blah blah corporations...blah blah and how you should have voted for Hillary.
/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal Revenues/——/ Debunked a 100 timesit's the way it always works out. it's the little secret dems hate so much and why they are always against them.
No, actually it does not, that is just a GOP myth.
The 5 years prior to the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased at an average of 15% per year. The 5 years after the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6% per year.
I gave the data. Try and show my math is wrong or you can kiss my ass also. You can stick your head up Trumps ass as far as it will go and that still will not change the cold hard facts
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
to this day, there hasn't been one politician to say what is a fair share. not one. They've been spewing that for fking ever. Not once explained what it means other than it sounds nice off their tongue.I'm getting two hundred a month more. that's yuge.Employers had till Feb 15th to implement the withholding changes and I do not know anyone that saw a change before the 20th, a lot of people I know didn’t see the change till the start of Feb
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
Liberals will be along shorty to inform you the rich...blah blah corporations...blah blah and how you should have voted for Hillary.
They are trying to make people feel less creepy about taking other people's money, somehow the 'rich' cheated them out of their fair share so confiscating their money is somehow righteous and okay. Meanwhile the bunch of dumb asses never get it, the 'rich' have the means to pass these tax increases right back down to the poor and middle class, the idiots are heaping tax increases on themselves.
/——/ explain why blue states like NY and Cal are looking for ways to side step the Trump tax bill that makes the rich pay their fair share. Fredo Cuomo said he needs to protect the highest earners and will try to make state taxes s charitable contributions. Explain that.to this day, there hasn't been one politician to say what is a fair share. not one. They've been spewing that for fking ever. Not once explained what it means other than it sounds nice off their tongue.I'm getting two hundred a month more. that's yuge.Employers had till Feb 15th to implement the withholding changes and I do not know anyone that saw a change before the 20th, a lot of people I know didn’t see the change till the start of Feb
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
Liberals will be along shorty to inform you the rich...blah blah corporations...blah blah and how you should have voted for Hillary.
They are trying to make people feel less creepy about taking other people's money, somehow the 'rich' cheated them out of their fair share so confiscating their money is somehow righteous and okay. Meanwhile the bunch of dumb asses never get it, the 'rich' have the means to pass these tax increases right back down to the poor and middle class, the idiots are heaping tax increases on themselves.
/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal Revenues/——/ Debunked a 100 timesit's the way it always works out. it's the little secret dems hate so much and why they are always against them.
No, actually it does not, that is just a GOP myth.
The 5 years prior to the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased at an average of 15% per year. The 5 years after the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6% per year.
I gave the data. Try and show my math is wrong or you can kiss my ass also. You can stick your head up Trumps ass as far as it will go and that still will not change the cold hard facts
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
| Year | Tax Revenue in billions | Amount of change in billions | Percent of change |
| 1977 | 356 | + 58 | 19% |
| 1978 | 399 | + 43 | 12% |
| 1979 | 463 | + 64 | 16% |
| 1980 | 517 | + 54 | 12% |
| 1981 | 599 | + 82 | 16% |
| 1982 | 618 | + 19 | 3% |
| 1983 | 601 | - 17 | -3% |
| 1984 | 666 | + 65 | 11% |
| 1985 | 734 | + 68 | 10% |
| 1986 | 796 | + 62 | 8% |
to this day, there hasn't been one politician to say what is a fair share. not one. They've been spewing that for fking ever. Not once explained what it means other than it sounds nice off their tongue.I'm getting two hundred a month more. that's yuge.I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
Liberals will be along shorty to inform you the rich...blah blah corporations...blah blah and how you should have voted for Hillary.
They are trying to make people feel less creepy about taking other people's money, somehow the 'rich' cheated them out of their fair share so confiscating their money is somehow righteous and okay. Meanwhile the bunch of dumb asses never get it, the 'rich' have the means to pass these tax increases right back down to the poor and middle class, the idiots are heaping tax increases on themselves./——/ explain why blue states like NY and Cal are looking for ways to side step the Trump tax bill that makes the rich pay their fair share. Fredo Cuomo said he needs to protect the highest earners and will try to make state taxes s charitable contributions. Explain that.to this day, there hasn't been one politician to say what is a fair share. not one. They've been spewing that for fking ever. Not once explained what it means other than it sounds nice off their tongue.I'm getting two hundred a month more. that's yuge.I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
Liberals will be along shorty to inform you the rich...blah blah corporations...blah blah and how you should have voted for Hillary.
They are trying to make people feel less creepy about taking other people's money, somehow the 'rich' cheated them out of their fair share so confiscating their money is somehow righteous and okay. Meanwhile the bunch of dumb asses never get it, the 'rich' have the means to pass these tax increases right back down to the poor and middle class, the idiots are heaping tax increases on themselves.
/——-/ build all the charts you want. You can’t compare% increases to fluctuations in the revenue. You want 90% of a dollar or 1% of $100 ?/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal Revenues/——/ Debunked a 100 timesit's the way it always works out. it's the little secret dems hate so much and why they are always against them.
No, actually it does not, that is just a GOP myth.
The 5 years prior to the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased at an average of 15% per year. The 5 years after the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6% per year.
I gave the data. Try and show my math is wrong or you can kiss my ass also. You can stick your head up Trumps ass as far as it will go and that still will not change the cold hard facts
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Typical fucking zealot, would rather fall for a propaganda piece than look at the data for themselves. Always have to have someone else telling you what to think.
Lets look at the actual data, if you have the balls to do so.
Here are the actual numbers, not opinion, not propaganda, but pure, cold hard facts.
The 5 years leading up the Reagan tax cuts tax revenue increased at a rate of 15% per year. The 5 years after the tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 6%.
So, while it is true that revenue still went up, there is no denying it went up at a slower rate after the tax cuts. The numbers do not lie, even if you do.
I am not going to build another table, but in the 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 7% per year and the 5 years after it increased at a rate of 4% per year.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year Tax Revenue in billions Amount of change in billions Percent of change 1977 356 + 58 19% 1978 399 + 43 12% 1979 463 + 64 16% 1980 517 + 54 12% 1981 599 + 82 16% 1982 618 + 19 3% 1983 601 - 17 -3% 1984 666 + 65 11% 1985 734 + 68 10% 1986 796 + 62 8%
The cold, hard fact that nobody on this forum can deny is that revenue increases slow after tax cuts, the numbers do not lie.
/——-/ build all the charts you want. You can’t compare% increases to fluctuations in the revenue. You want 90% of a dollar or 1% of $100 ?/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal Revenues/——/ Debunked a 100 timesNo, actually it does not, that is just a GOP myth.
The 5 years prior to the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased at an average of 15% per year. The 5 years after the Reagan tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6% per year.
I gave the data. Try and show my math is wrong or you can kiss my ass also. You can stick your head up Trumps ass as far as it will go and that still will not change the cold hard facts
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Typical fucking zealot, would rather fall for a propaganda piece than look at the data for themselves. Always have to have someone else telling you what to think.
Lets look at the actual data, if you have the balls to do so.
Here are the actual numbers, not opinion, not propaganda, but pure, cold hard facts.
The 5 years leading up the Reagan tax cuts tax revenue increased at a rate of 15% per year. The 5 years after the tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 6%.
So, while it is true that revenue still went up, there is no denying it went up at a slower rate after the tax cuts. The numbers do not lie, even if you do.
I am not going to build another table, but in the 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 7% per year and the 5 years after it increased at a rate of 4% per year.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year Tax Revenue in billions Amount of change in billions Percent of change 1977 356 + 58 19% 1978 399 + 43 12% 1979 463 + 64 16% 1980 517 + 54 12% 1981 599 + 82 16% 1982 618 + 19 3% 1983 601 - 17 -3% 1984 666 + 65 11% 1985 734 + 68 10% 1986 796 + 62 8%
The cold, hard fact that nobody on this forum can deny is that revenue increases slow after tax cuts, the numbers do not lie.
/-----/ Deny deny deny. Well I believe the Wall Street Journal over you anytime. They even give Carter some of the credit:/——-/ build all the charts you want. You can’t compare% increases to fluctuations in the revenue. You want 90% of a dollar or 1% of $100 ?/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal Revenues/——/ Debunked a 100 times
I gave the data. Try and show my math is wrong or you can kiss my ass also. You can stick your head up Trumps ass as far as it will go and that still will not change the cold hard facts
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Typical fucking zealot, would rather fall for a propaganda piece than look at the data for themselves. Always have to have someone else telling you what to think.
Lets look at the actual data, if you have the balls to do so.
Here are the actual numbers, not opinion, not propaganda, but pure, cold hard facts.
The 5 years leading up the Reagan tax cuts tax revenue increased at a rate of 15% per year. The 5 years after the tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 6%.
So, while it is true that revenue still went up, there is no denying it went up at a slower rate after the tax cuts. The numbers do not lie, even if you do.
I am not going to build another table, but in the 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 7% per year and the 5 years after it increased at a rate of 4% per year.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year Tax Revenue in billions Amount of change in billions Percent of change 1977 356 + 58 19% 1978 399 + 43 12% 1979 463 + 64 16% 1980 517 + 54 12% 1981 599 + 82 16% 1982 618 + 19 3% 1983 601 - 17 -3% 1984 666 + 65 11% 1985 734 + 68 10% 1986 796 + 62 8%
The cold, hard fact that nobody on this forum can deny is that revenue increases slow after tax cuts, the numbers do not lie.
I figured you would stick your head back up Trump's ass and deny the cold hard facts. That is what all Trump zealots do.
/-----/ Deny deny deny. Well I believe the Wall Street Journal over you anytime. They even give Carter some of the credit:/——-/ build all the charts you want. You can’t compare% increases to fluctuations in the revenue. You want 90% of a dollar or 1% of $100 ?/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal RevenuesI gave the data. Try and show my math is wrong or you can kiss my ass also. You can stick your head up Trumps ass as far as it will go and that still will not change the cold hard facts
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Typical fucking zealot, would rather fall for a propaganda piece than look at the data for themselves. Always have to have someone else telling you what to think.
Lets look at the actual data, if you have the balls to do so.
Here are the actual numbers, not opinion, not propaganda, but pure, cold hard facts.
The 5 years leading up the Reagan tax cuts tax revenue increased at a rate of 15% per year. The 5 years after the tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 6%.
So, while it is true that revenue still went up, there is no denying it went up at a slower rate after the tax cuts. The numbers do not lie, even if you do.
I am not going to build another table, but in the 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 7% per year and the 5 years after it increased at a rate of 4% per year.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year Tax Revenue in billions Amount of change in billions Percent of change 1977 356 + 58 19% 1978 399 + 43 12% 1979 463 + 64 16% 1980 517 + 54 12% 1981 599 + 82 16% 1982 618 + 19 3% 1983 601 - 17 -3% 1984 666 + 65 11% 1985 734 + 68 10% 1986 796 + 62 8%
The cold, hard fact that nobody on this forum can deny is that revenue increases slow after tax cuts, the numbers do not lie.
I figured you would stick your head back up Trump's ass and deny the cold hard facts. That is what all Trump zealots do.
Reagan Cut Taxes, Revenue Boomed
The Reagan tax cuts laid the foundation for a quarter-century of strong, noninflationary growth, which, despite three subsequent recessions, averaged 3.4% until the beginning of the Obama administration. And tax revenue was generated by an expanding economy rather than pilfered through bracket creep.
/-----/ No matter what source I post you'll just dismiss it./-----/ Deny deny deny. Well I believe the Wall Street Journal over you anytime. They even give Carter some of the credit:/——-/ build all the charts you want. You can’t compare% increases to fluctuations in the revenue. You want 90% of a dollar or 1% of $100 ?/——/ Like a ping pong ball tossed against a brick wall, facts can not penetrate a libtards closed mind. So for the 101st time since 2002: Tax Cuts Increase Federal Revenues
Typical fucking zealot, would rather fall for a propaganda piece than look at the data for themselves. Always have to have someone else telling you what to think.
Lets look at the actual data, if you have the balls to do so.
Here are the actual numbers, not opinion, not propaganda, but pure, cold hard facts.
The 5 years leading up the Reagan tax cuts tax revenue increased at a rate of 15% per year. The 5 years after the tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 6%.
So, while it is true that revenue still went up, there is no denying it went up at a slower rate after the tax cuts. The numbers do not lie, even if you do.
I am not going to build another table, but in the 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 7% per year and the 5 years after it increased at a rate of 4% per year.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year Tax Revenue in billions Amount of change in billions Percent of change 1977 356 + 58 19% 1978 399 + 43 12% 1979 463 + 64 16% 1980 517 + 54 12% 1981 599 + 82 16% 1982 618 + 19 3% 1983 601 - 17 -3% 1984 666 + 65 11% 1985 734 + 68 10% 1986 796 + 62 8%
The cold, hard fact that nobody on this forum can deny is that revenue increases slow after tax cuts, the numbers do not lie.
I figured you would stick your head back up Trump's ass and deny the cold hard facts. That is what all Trump zealots do.
Reagan Cut Taxes, Revenue Boomed
The Reagan tax cuts laid the foundation for a quarter-century of strong, noninflationary growth, which, despite three subsequent recessions, averaged 3.4% until the beginning of the Obama administration. And tax revenue was generated by an expanding economy rather than pilfered through bracket creep.
The numbers do not lie. You cannot refute the facts, all you have is empty talk and no facts.
/-----/ No matter what source I post you'll just dismiss it./-----/ Deny deny deny. Well I believe the Wall Street Journal over you anytime. They even give Carter some of the credit:/——-/ build all the charts you want. You can’t compare% increases to fluctuations in the revenue. You want 90% of a dollar or 1% of $100 ?Typical fucking zealot, would rather fall for a propaganda piece than look at the data for themselves. Always have to have someone else telling you what to think.
Lets look at the actual data, if you have the balls to do so.
Here are the actual numbers, not opinion, not propaganda, but pure, cold hard facts.
The 5 years leading up the Reagan tax cuts tax revenue increased at a rate of 15% per year. The 5 years after the tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 6%.
So, while it is true that revenue still went up, there is no denying it went up at a slower rate after the tax cuts. The numbers do not lie, even if you do.
I am not going to build another table, but in the 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cut revenue increased at a rate of 7% per year and the 5 years after it increased at a rate of 4% per year.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Year Tax Revenue in billions Amount of change in billions Percent of change 1977 356 + 58 19% 1978 399 + 43 12% 1979 463 + 64 16% 1980 517 + 54 12% 1981 599 + 82 16% 1982 618 + 19 3% 1983 601 - 17 -3% 1984 666 + 65 11% 1985 734 + 68 10% 1986 796 + 62 8%
The cold, hard fact that nobody on this forum can deny is that revenue increases slow after tax cuts, the numbers do not lie.
I figured you would stick your head back up Trump's ass and deny the cold hard facts. That is what all Trump zealots do.
Reagan Cut Taxes, Revenue Boomed
The Reagan tax cuts laid the foundation for a quarter-century of strong, noninflationary growth, which, despite three subsequent recessions, averaged 3.4% until the beginning of the Obama administration. And tax revenue was generated by an expanding economy rather than pilfered through bracket creep.
The numbers do not lie. You cannot refute the facts, all you have is empty talk and no facts.
View attachment 176542
Apple, Microsoft, Google, Walmart, and other tax cheating corporations will not have to make their first estimated payments until April 17th.so first month the tax cuts have been in play and lo and behold the treasury collected more in taxes.
Who would have thought cutting taxes would raise revenues? I mean other than everyone who understands economics
so first month the tax cuts have been in play and lo and behold the treasury collected more in taxes.
Who would have thought cutting taxes would raise revenues? I mean other than everyone who understands economics
so first month the tax cuts have been in play and lo and behold the treasury collected more in taxes.
Who would have thought cutting taxes would raise revenues? I mean other than everyone who understands economics
Yup it worked for Kennedy and Reagan. Who knew???
Well except for the fact the cuts had not been implemented till at best till then end of the month it is hard to tie them to the increase in revenue, which rally was not all that great. Last Jan saw a larger percent of growth
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Hope you let them know at CBS.
Feds Collect Record Taxes in First Month Under Tax Cut; Run Surplus in January
You mean CNSNews, the far right news blog? That is where you link goes
Oops, we'll have to let them know too. I should have known CBS wouldn't report on a story like that.
Employers had till Feb 15th to implement the withholding changes and I do not know anyone that saw a change before the 20th, a lot of people I know didn’t see the change till the start of Feb
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I did on my 15th paycheck, hundreds of dollars more in my pocket oh man Go Trump! MAGA!!
well actually they are mostly based on how well the company is doing financially. You're a lucky one. I haven't had an increase in salary since 2003. and many a folk lost their job during obummer. quite a few and they were out so long they fell off the unemployment numbers. this is a complicated subject. However, when someone gets something unexpected they are most always grateful. I realize punks like you take that kind of thing for granted. shame.did you get a raise under obummer?so you wouldn't take 200 a month extra eh? wow, you truly are a leftist loon.For someone flipping burgers at Wendy's, that is pretty good money! I am happy for you!
I got a 12,200 a year raise in Jan, I do not need to rely on tax cuts for more money, I earn it the old fashioned way.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Of course I did. My promotions are based off of my performance, not who the president is. In my five (well, five in April) years with my current employer I have received two promotions totaling about 22 grand a year from when I first started.
During that time I finished my masters and two certificate programs and did the PMP training and testing and received my PMP certification.
