Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's not an "accident," but rather tiny genetic mutations that accumulate over generations to produce new traits, and processes that make these variations more common or rare [i.e. natural selection].
It's just science.
Someday, if you have time pick up a copy of "Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors." Carl Sagan.. I thought it a very thought provoking book.
Sagan and Druyan argue that territoriality, xenophobia, ethnocentrism, occasional outbreeding and a preference for small, semi-isolated groups are elements in a survival strategy common to many species, including Homo sapiens. They assert that society's problems increasingly demand global solutions and require a dramatic, strategic shift which the authors believe humankind is capable of achieving. The authors discuss the evolution of Earth's atmosphere and life forms, the genetic code, and the advantages of sexual reproduction. The final third of the book deals chimpanzees, baboons and apes, with the authors finding the social lives of these primates "hauntingly familiar" to the lives of humans with their dominance hierarchy, combat, suppression of females and chimps' remarkable ability to communicate through symbols.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadows_of_Forgotten_Ancestors_(book)
The operation of this incredible machine, at over 70 wing movements a second, make the evolutionary theory seem silly.......... are we really suppose to believe this extremely efficent design was just an accident?
I'm a designer,
. "Science" has been proven wrong continually since the first "scientists" barfed up their ideas about whatever they studied.
Why would this bird need to
"evolve" to just drink from particular flowers that needed the abilities it's capable of
, why not just feed from flowers that were easier to access.
Why would this bird evolve this far
and yet a shark hasn't changed much since it's original design
We are suppose to buy that this incredible bird started as a spark in the primordial ooze.
The operation of this incredible machine, at over 70 wing movements a second, make the evolutionary theory seem silly.......... are we really suppose to believe this extremely efficent design was just an accident?
Your ignorance is astounding, The moment you said 'accident', any hint of credibility was lost
I'm a designer,
You are proof that a designer need not be intelligent. I hereby forward the Retarded Designer Hypothesis
You're a fucking idiot. 'Science' has never been 'proven wrong'
Who said anything about a 'need'
Who said the flowers were like that to begin with?
These bird seems to find these flowers plenty easy to access- oh, not to mention that only ignorant fools like you try to read 'motivation' or desire into genetic drift and mutation.
1- There is no why'
2-'this far'? You have no idea what you're talking about.
and yet a shark hasn't changed much since it's original design
1-Do tell what the shark's 'original design' was and prove it
2-You're presupposing design- because you're an idiot
.We are suppose to buy that this incredible bird started as a spark in the primordial ooze.
Who said a bird was electricity. try going to school or reading a science book inste4ad of getting your information regarding sciece from the bible and tract Society
you sound like the idiot!
Actually, I'm the smart one correcting the IDiot
Isn't there room for discussion?
intelligent discussion, sure. the retarded talking points in the OP, no.
The operation of this incredible machine, at over 70 wing movements a second, make the evolutionary theory seem silly.......... are we really suppose to believe this extremely efficent design was just an accident?
Your ignorance is astounding, The moment you said 'accident', any hint of credibility was lost
I'm a designer,
You are proof that a designer need not be intelligent. I hereby forward the Retarded Designer Hypothesis
You're a fucking idiot. 'Science' has never been 'proven wrong'
Who said anything about a 'need'
Who said the flowers were like that to begin with?
These bird seems to find these flowers plenty easy to access- oh, not to mention that only ignorant fools like you try to read 'motivation' or desire into genetic drift and mutation.
1- There is no why'
2-'this far'? You have no idea what you're talking about.
and yet a shark hasn't changed much since it's original design
1-Do tell what the shark's 'original design' was and prove it
2-You're presupposing design- because you're an idiot
.We are suppose to buy that this incredible bird started as a spark in the primordial ooze.
Who said a bird was electricity. try going to school or reading a science book inste4ad of getting your information regarding sciece from the bible and tract Society
you sound like the idiot!
Actually, I'm the smart one correcting the IDiot
Isn't there room for discussion?
intelligent discussion, sure. the retarded talking points in the OP, no.
seeing as I tore apart the IDiot's moronic assertions and ignorant talking point...
Notice no attempt to defend the OP's ignorance- only attacks upon the Harbinger
The operation of this incredible machine, at over 70 wing movements a second, make the evolutionary theory seem silly.......... are we really suppose to believe this extremely efficent design was just an accident?
Your ignorance is astounding, The moment you said 'accident', any hint of credibility was lost
You are proof that a designer need not be intelligent. I hereby forward the Retarded Designer Hypothesis
You're a fucking idiot. 'Science' has never been 'proven wrong'
Who said anything about a 'need'
Who said the flowers were like that to begin with?
These bird seems to find these flowers plenty easy to access- oh, not to mention that only ignorant fools like you try to read 'motivation' or desire into genetic drift and mutation.
1- There is no why'
2-'this far'? You have no idea what you're talking about.
1-Do tell what the shark's 'original design' was and prove it
2-You're presupposing design- because you're an idiot
.We are suppose to buy that this incredible bird started as a spark in the primordial ooze.
Who said a bird was electricity. try going to school or reading a science book inste4ad of getting your information regarding sciece from the bible and tract Society
Wow, did I hit a nerve badass? I'm not particularly religious and I have never read the bible, the first paragraph put me to sleep. I do question dickheads that put a ridiculous amount of trust in everything put out by anybody that calls themselves a scientist. This type of ultra slow motion photography is fairly recent and I'm sure it's use has disproved many theories by your science gods.
As for your assumptions about me, are you a "scientist", your theories are about as accurate as many I have met ...... tool.
The operation of this incredible machine, at over 70 wing movements a second, make the evolutionary theory seem silly.......... are we really suppose to believe this extremely efficent design was just an accident?
YouTube - Time Warp: Hummingbird
