Lovebears' thread title was reworded by who?
"Individual Mandate Unconstitutional."
and why?
right wingers saving face for each other?
"Individual Mandate Unconstitutional."
and why?
right wingers saving face for each other?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Guy Pinestra and his trash like simply can't comprehend the issue.
I comprehend the issue just fine, Fake Malarkey. It seems that you're accusing me of your own shortcomings.
What part of 'unsustainable' don't you get?
You offer plenty of assertion, no proof. Until then, your argument is unsustainable.
Lovebears' thread title was reworded by who?
"Individual Mandate Unconstitutional."
and why?
right wingers saving face for each other?
Screaming Eagle certainly has a right to his opinions but not to his own facts and definitions.
His argument is fail.
Dante changed 6-3 to 5-4 but conman posted Dante was wrong. Obamacare was Unconstitutional because FOX News said it was.
You have to provide the facts within the political and historical definitions.
When you take on the affirmation you made with solid, credible evidence, then I can deal with your points, but I don't have to deal with a fantasy land.
Dante changed 6-3 to 5-4 but conman posted Dante was wrong. Obamacare was Unconstitutional because FOX News said it was.
dante isTalking about dante in that third person again. Dante needs to get laid.
Dante changed 6-3 to 5-4 but conman posted Dante was wrong. Obamacare was Unconstitutional because FOX News said it was.
dante isTalking about dante in that third person again. Dante needs to get laid.
thanks but no thanks
dante isTalking about dante in that third person again. Dante needs to get laid.
thanks but no thanks
Tha's right.
Dainty is celibate.
For good reason.
thanks but no thanks
Tha's right.
Dainty is celibate.
For good reason.
now that is DANTE GAY!!!!!
That wasn't an invite bub
Dante changed 6-3 to 5-4 but conman posted Dante was wrong. Obamacare was Unconstitutional because FOX News said it was.
dante isTalking about dante in that third person again. Dante needs to get laid.
thanks but no thanks
Tha's right.
Dainty is celibate.
For good reason.
now that is DANTE GAY!!!!!
Nah. That's just Dainty being Dainty.
You have to provide the facts within the political and historical definitions.
When you take on the affirmation you made with solid, credible evidence, then I can deal with your points, but I don't have to deal with a fantasy land.
Please provide the "political and historical definitions" pertinent to this discussion.....facts about ss/medcare-caid have already been provided by GuyPinestra.....url=http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/14/taxes-social-security-opinions-columnists-medicare.html/]The 81% Tax Increase - Forbes.com[/url] if you really want more proof that the social programs of ss/medcare-caid are failing and going bankrupt let me know....however you can find plenty of proof by just googling yourself.....
One, you are the one responsible for appropriate facts, and coat tailing Guy is a a cop pout. You can post them with your own thesis if you wish; that would be professional.
Two, you have to offer proof, kiddo, not make links.
You have to make a cogent argument with evidence, kiddo. Go for it or fail.
You have to provide the facts within the political and historical definitions.
When you take on the affirmation you made with solid, credible evidence, then I can deal with your points, but I don't have to deal with a fantasy land.
Please provide the "political and historical definitions" pertinent to this discussion.....facts about ss/medcare-caid have already been provided by GuyPinestra.....url=http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/14/taxes-social-security-opinions-columnists-medicare.html/]The 81% Tax Increase - Forbes.com[/url] if you really want more proof that the social programs of ss/medcare-caid are failing and going bankrupt let me know....however you can find plenty of proof by just googling yourself.....
One, you are the one responsible for appropriate facts, and coat tailing Guy is a a cop pout. You can post them with your own thesis if you wish; that would be professional.
Two, you have to offer proof, kiddo, not make links.
You have to make a cogent argument with evidence, kiddo. Go for it or fail.
Please provide the "political and historical definitions" pertinent to this discussion.....facts about ss/medcare-caid have already been provided by GuyPinestra.....url=http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/14/taxes-social-security-opinions-columnists-medicare.html/]The 81% Tax Increase - Forbes.com[/url] if you really want more proof that the social programs of ss/medcare-caid are failing and going bankrupt let me know....however you can find plenty of proof by just googling yourself.....
LOL
i'm still waiting for your "the political and historical definitions"..............
One, you are the one responsible for appropriate facts, and coat tailing Guy is a a cop pout. You can post them with your own thesis if you wish; that would be professional.
Two, you have to offer proof, kiddo, not make links.
You have to make a cogent argument with evidence, kiddo. Go for it or fail.
LOL
i'm still waiting for your "the political and historical definitions"..............
You know what they are. You don't get to make them up.
We are waiting.
I don't make up the definitions, SE. They are fixed. But if you use made up or extremist definitions or "facts", then you don't have a case.
We are waiting.