Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gun owners believe in the law but when pushed we will take matters into our own hands.
They will lose.
Maybe...maybe not.......did you forget Obamacare?
The stupid Moon Bats are confused, as usual.
The Supreme Court did not make a ruling on the case.
They simply refused to hear the case on the motion to dismiss like they do 99% of the cases presented to them.
There is a Federal law that provides exemption from stupid lawsuits by the filthy ass anti gun nuts.
When the right case comes the Supremes will take it up if necessary. There hasn't even been a trial yet.
The stupid Moon Bats are confused, as usual.
The Supreme Court did not make a ruling on the case.
They simply refused to hear the case on the motion to dismiss like they do 99% of the cases presented to them.
There is a Federal law that provides exemption from stupid lawsuits by the filthy ass anti gun nuts.
When the right case comes the Supremes will take it up if necessary. There hasn't even been a trial yet.
Get a grip, it is because of people like you that the University of Virginia has canceled the 21-gun salute for its Veterans Day ceremony over concerns that firing weapons on campus could cause "panic" among students.I’m saying they can quickly and easily become a mass killer. That’s what the gun is for. It’s irresponsible to sell weapons for mass killing to the public.So you are saying that everyone that owns an AR15 is a mass murderer and there is no other purpose for an ARIt’s a fact a killer with a AR is really dangerous.Companies get sued all the time for being irresponsible and making dangerous products. The gun companies have been selling mass killing weapons to the public for too long. Hope they win a fortune.
it is a fact that not a single time in human history has a gun killed a person
you ,mean like the fact that anywhere between 500K and 3 million times a yr guns are used to stop crime and murder???I’m glad the public seems to be getting tired of all the childish pro gun arguments...the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,Then why sell weapons for mass killing?When is mass killing lawful?Easy, but irrelevant.
Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.
never,,dont be a dumbass
but none of those are protected rights,,,Yes, bars can be held liable for letting a drunk leave driving his car. Have you not heard that Big Pharma has successfully been sued for making pain pills that are addictive? Those days are already here.Great news. The gun industry has been irresponsible in selling weapons for mass killing to the public. Hopefully they will be soon paying for it.
Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Families' Case Against Remington Arms To Proceed
The Supreme Court has denied Remington Arms Co.'s bid to block a lawsuit filed by families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook school massacre. The families say Remington should be held liable, as the maker of the AR-15-style rifle used in the 2012 killings.
And you are an idiot....where did Remington have any culpability in what happened, you doofus.
What you asshats don't understand, is these companies are the gateway......if you can sue a gun maker for the illegal use of their product, car makers, booze makers, computer makers are all next in line........you moron.
Remington is being sued for marketing them for killing peoples. It was not misused. Remington needs to pay for damage done. They inspire anal Gun Nutter crimes.Companies cannot be sued when their product was misused to illegally murder someone means it's misusedActually not.To be honest, I am quite shocked that the SCOTUS allowed this case to proceed. If Remington Arms Co. is held liable I believe it will open up a Pandora's Box of legal issues for other industries. We'll see how it plays out.
This case merely meets one of the exemption provisions in the law prohibiting bringing suite against gun manufacturers.
Gunmaker lost appeal to stop the civil case from going to trial.What BrainFart neglected to mention is that this ruling does NOT assign any culpability to Remington, it merely allows the plaintiffs an opportunity to prove their case.
Critical thinking isn't a strong point among leftists.
Gunmaker lost appeal to stop the civil case from going to trial.What BrainFart neglected to mention is that this ruling does NOT assign any culpability to Remington, it merely allows the plaintiffs an opportunity to prove their case.
Critical thinking isn't a strong point among leftists.
If they got a case, why the appeal? As surely they can just win it on merits
as weapons don't kill peoples, people do. That them peoples be
the makers of guns and CEO's who cause the mass killing deaths.
I’m saying they can quickly and easily become a mass killer. That’s what the gun is for. It’s irresponsible to sell weapons for mass killing to the public.So you are saying that everyone that owns an AR15 is a mass murderer and there is no other purpose for an ARIt’s a fact a killer with a AR is really dangerous.Companies get sued all the time for being irresponsible and making dangerous products. The gun companies have been selling mass killing weapons to the public for too long. Hope they win a fortune.And you are an idiot....where did Remington have any culpability in what happened, you doofus.
What you asshats don't understand, is these companies are the gateway......if you can sue a gun maker for the illegal use of their product, car makers, booze makers, computer makers are all next in line........you moron.
it is a fact that not a single time in human history has a gun killed a person
Dang, you mean they don't have the Gun Makers Full immunity thang?Big Pharma is being sued for the opiod crisis, this doesn't surprise me.
They need to get that ASAP! So they can make more thangs that kill peoples freely.
Then why sell weapons for mass killing?
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Blaming Gunmaker Remington For Sandy Hook MassacreAnd they just ruled it can move forward.Someone is feeding you some bullshit this case was throughout last yearGreat news. The gun industry has been irresponsible in selling weapons for mass killing to the public. Hopefully they will be soon paying for it.
Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Families' Case Against Remington Arms To Proceed
The Supreme Court has denied Remington Arms Co.'s bid to block a lawsuit filed by families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook school massacre. The families say Remington should be held liable, as the maker of the AR-15-style rifle used in the 2012 killings.
you ,mean like the fact that anywhere between 500K and 3 million times a yr guns are used to stop crime and murder???I’m glad the public seems to be getting tired of all the childish pro gun arguments...the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,Then why sell weapons for mass killing?
why do you keep leaving this fact out???
Remington is being sued for marketing them for killing peoples. It was not misused. Remington needs to pay for damage done. They inspire anal Gun Nutter crimes.Companies cannot be sued when their product was misused to illegally murder someone means it's misusedActually not.To be honest, I am quite shocked that the SCOTUS allowed this case to proceed. If Remington Arms Co. is held liable I believe it will open up a Pandora's Box of legal issues for other industries. We'll see how it plays out.
This case merely meets one of the exemption provisions in the law prohibiting bringing suite against gun manufacturers.
