Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Families' Case Against Remington Arms To Proceed

[Baz Ares]

Companies get sued all the time for being irresponsible and making dangerous products. The gun companies have been selling mass killing weapons to the public for too long. Hope they win a fortune.

it is a fact that not a single time in human history has a gun killed a person

It’s a fact a killer with a AR is really dangerous.

So you are saying that everyone that owns an AR15 is a mass murderer and there is no other purpose for an AR

I’m saying they can quickly and easily become a mass killer. That’s what the gun is for. It’s irresponsible to sell weapons for mass killing to the public.

They don't, a rifle is not a mass killing weapon, a bomb is. Or a Truck....

 

[Baz Ares]

never,,dont be a dumbass

Then why sell weapons for mass killing?

the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,

I’m glad the public seems to be getting tired of all the childish pro gun arguments...

you ,mean like the fact that anywhere between 500K and 3 million times a yr guns are used to stop crime and murder???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???


Oooh, ooooh, pick me, pick me!!!!!

Cause he's an asshat?

Did you call for your personal asshat?

 

[Baz Ares]

Big Pharma is being sued for the opiod crisis, this doesn't surprise me.

Dang, you mean they don't have the Gun Makers Full immunity thang?
They need to get that ASAP! So they can make more thangs that kill peoples freely.

I use opiods for my illness, I take about 50-80 a year, it has benefited myself. Not sure why it will kill you.

The drugmaker gave hit backs to get people hooked on them. And many died.
And I have to cover that cost from my taxes. Let them pay for it.

 

[2aguy]

Then why sell weapons for mass killing?

the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,

I’m glad the public seems to be getting tired of all the childish pro gun arguments...

you ,mean like the fact that anywhere between 500K and 3 million times a yr guns are used to stop crime and murder???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???


Oooh, ooooh, pick me, pick me!!!!!

Cause he's an asshat?

Did you call for your personal asshat?
View attachment 289472

Hey, dumb ass....the ACLU asked him to do that....you moron....

Gun Control Laws Should Be Fair

But gun control laws, like any law, should be fair, effective and not based on prejudice or stereotype. This rule met none of those criteria.

In this era of “alternative facts,” we must urge politicians to create laws based on reliable evidence and solid data.

The thousands of Americans whose disability benefits are managed by someone else range from young people with depression and financial inexperience to older adults with Down syndrome needing help with a limited budget. But no data — none — show that these individuals have a propensity for violence in general or gun violence in particular.

To the contrary, studies show that people with mental disabilities are less likely to commit firearm crimes than to be the victimsof violence by others.

--------------------------
The ACLU and 23 national disability groups did not oppose this rule because we want more guns in our community.

This is about more than guns. Adding more innocent Americans to the National Instant Criminal Background database because of a mental disability is a disturbing trend — one that could be applied to voting, parenting or other rights dearer than gun ownership. We opposed it because it would do little to stem gun violence but do much to harm our civil rights.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The stupid Moon Bats are confused, as usual.

The Supreme Court did not make a ruling on the case.

They simply refused to hear the case on the motion to dismiss like they do 99% of the cases presented to them.

There is a Federal law that provides exemption from stupid lawsuits by the filthy ass anti gun nuts.

When the right case comes the Supremes will take it up if necessary. There hasn't even been a trial yet.

I tried to point all of that out dumbasses ignored it.

 

[Polishprince]

Great news. The gun industry has been irresponsible in selling weapons for mass killing to the public. Hopefully they will be soon paying for it.

Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Families' Case Against Remington Arms To Proceed

The Supreme Court has denied Remington Arms Co.'s bid to block a lawsuit filed by families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook school massacre. The families say Remington should be held liable, as the maker of the AR-15-style rifle used in the 2012 killings.

Gun manufacturers generally only sell to licensed gun dealers. Not to the general public.

BTW, the Sandy Hook shooter didn't buy his weapon at all- Mr. Lanza stole the rifle at all.

 

[Papageorgio]

Big Pharma is being sued for the opiod crisis, this doesn't surprise me.

Dang, you mean they don't have the Gun Makers Full immunity thang?
They need to get that ASAP! So they can make more thangs that kill peoples freely.

I use opiods for my illness, I take about 50-80 a year, it has benefited myself. Not sure why it will kill you.

The drugmaker gave hit backs to get people hooked on them. And many died.
And I have to cover that cost from my taxes. Let them pay for it.

Every drug out there is involved as you call them "hit backs." I am responsible for my usage of them, no one else.

 

[Flash]

The stupid Moon Bats are confused, as usual.

The Supreme Court did not make a ruling on the case.

They simply refused to hear the case on the motion to dismiss like they do 99% of the cases presented to them.

There is a Federal law that provides exemption from stupid lawsuits by the filthy ass anti gun nuts.

When the right case comes the Supremes will take it up if necessary. There hasn't even been a trial yet.

I tried to point all of that out dumbasses ignored it.

These stupid Moon Bats are uneducated and low information and will always ignore facts if the facts conflicts with their filthy ass agenda to make this country a socialist shithole.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

To be honest, I am quite shocked that the SCOTUS allowed this case to proceed. If Remington Arms Co. is held liable I believe it will open up a Pandora's Box of legal issues for other industries. We'll see how it plays out.

Actually not.

This case merely meets one of the exemption provisions in the law prohibiting bringing suite against gun manufacturers.

Companies cannot be sued when their product was misused to illegally murder someone means it's misused

Remington is being sued for marketing them for killing peoples. It was not misused. Remington needs to pay for damage done. They inspire anal Gun Nutter crimes.

Snap time they kill ok so what? you can legally kill should the manufacture be sued then? should they be sued when cops kill? When a product is misused no one can sue the manufacture Laws on the books prevent the stupid shit.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The stupid Moon Bats are confused, as usual.

The Supreme Court did not make a ruling on the case.

They simply refused to hear the case on the motion to dismiss like they do 99% of the cases presented to them.

There is a Federal law that provides exemption from stupid lawsuits by the filthy ass anti gun nuts.

When the right case comes the Supremes will take it up if necessary. There hasn't even been a trial yet.

I tried to point all of that out dumbasses ignored it.

These stupid Moon Bats are uneducated and low information and will always ignore facts if the facts conflicts with their filthy ass agenda to make this country a socialist shithole.

THEY ARE LIKE TODDLERS IN THE CRIB LOOKING UP AT THE LITTLE THING WITH STARS AND MOON S ON IT TRYING TO CATCH ONE LOL

 

[Flash]

[


Gun manufacturers generally only sell to licensed gun dealers. Not to the general public.

BTW, the Sandy Hook shooter didn't buy his weapon at all- Mr. Lanza stole the rifle at all.

In fact the demented sonofabitch killed the legal owner of the firearms in order to steal them.

You are correct about the manufacturers. Even if you buy from a factory like I bought a Bushmaster AR-15 a few years ago they are a licensed FFL and will only ship to another FFL.

 

[Papageorgio]

Where in any advertisements does Remington promote mass killings? Hollywood uses guns to promote mass killings, maybe they need to sue Hollywood for the violent movies.

 

[Wyatt earp]

To be honest, I am quite shocked that the SCOTUS allowed this case to proceed. If Remington Arms Co. is held liable I believe it will open up a Pandora's Box of legal issues for other industries. We'll see how it plays out.

Broke ass companies or higher prices..


Maybe like malpractice insurance for doctors?

 

[Wyatt earp]

They are. When used many die. We have quite a long list of mass killings with them.

At this point, you are either unbelievably deceived, or else willfully lying.

What I stated is a hard fact. The overwhelming vast majority of AR-15s and similar rifles have never been involved in any event in which people were killed or injured; much less in any mass-killing.

And when they are used by a killer 50+ people have died with just one shooter.

Do you think Iran should have nukes?

Do you think you should have a bathtub?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Where in any advertisements does Remington promote mass killings? Hollywood uses guns to promote mass killings, maybe they need to sue Hollywood for the violent movies.

It's in the story.. it also talks about video games.


.

 

[Baz Ares]

the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,

I’m glad the public seems to be getting tired of all the childish pro gun arguments...

you ,mean like the fact that anywhere between 500K and 3 million times a yr guns are used to stop crime and murder???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???


Oooh, ooooh, pick me, pick me!!!!!

Cause he's an asshat?

Did you call for your personal asshat?
View attachment 289472

Hey, dumb ass....the ACLU asked him to do that....you moron....

Gun Control Laws Should Be Fair

But gun control laws, like any law, should be fair, effective and not based on prejudice or stereotype. This rule met none of those criteria.

In this era of “alternative facts,” we must urge politicians to create laws based on reliable evidence and solid data.

The thousands of Americans whose disability benefits are managed by someone else range from young people with depression and financial inexperience to older adults with Down syndrome needing help with a limited budget. But no data — none — show that these individuals have a propensity for violence in general or gun violence in particular.

To the contrary, studies show that people with mental disabilities are less likely to commit firearm crimes than to be the victimsof violence by others.

--------------------------
The ACLU and 23 national disability groups did not oppose this rule because we want more guns in our community.

This is about more than guns. Adding more innocent Americans to the National Instant Criminal Background database because of a mental disability is a disturbing trend — one that could be applied to voting, parenting or other rights dearer than gun ownership. We opposed it because it would do little to stem gun violence but do much to harm our civil rights.

What's fair to others giving mentally damaged people guns?
I'm sure if they win the case, the anal Gun maker will appeal that award.

 

[Brain357]

Companies get sued all the time for being irresponsible and making dangerous products. The gun companies have been selling mass killing weapons to the public for too long. Hope they win a fortune.

it is a fact that not a single time in human history has a gun killed a person

It’s a fact a killer with a AR is really dangerous.

So you are saying that everyone that owns an AR15 is a mass murderer and there is no other purpose for an AR

I’m saying they can quickly and easily become a mass killer. That’s what the gun is for. It’s irresponsible to sell weapons for mass killing to the public.

Get a grip, it is because of people like you that the University of Virginia has canceled the 21-gun salute for its Veterans Day ceremony over concerns that firing weapons on campus could cause "panic" among students.

Actually it’s the fact that we have regular mass shootings. No other country regularly has mass shootings...

 

[progressive hunter]

it is a fact that not a single time in human history has a gun killed a person

It’s a fact a killer with a AR is really dangerous.

So you are saying that everyone that owns an AR15 is a mass murderer and there is no other purpose for an AR

I’m saying they can quickly and easily become a mass killer. That’s what the gun is for. It’s irresponsible to sell weapons for mass killing to the public.

Get a grip, it is because of people like you that the University of Virginia has canceled the 21-gun salute for its Veterans Day ceremony over concerns that firing weapons on campus could cause "panic" among students.

Actually it’s the fact that we have regular mass shootings. No other country regularly has mass shootings...

thats a lie,,,

 

[Brain357]

When is mass killing lawful?

never,,dont be a dumbass

Then why sell weapons for mass killing?

the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,

I’m glad the public seems to be getting tired of all the childish pro gun arguments...

you ,mean like the fact that anywhere between 500K and 3 million times a yr guns are used to stop crime and murder???

why do you keep leaving this fact out???

Cause it’s not a fact. It’s imaginary. Hence why your range is so broad.

 

[Baz Ares]

[


Gun manufacturers generally only sell to licensed gun dealers. Not to the general public.

BTW, the Sandy Hook shooter didn't buy his weapon at all- Mr. Lanza stole the rifle at all.

In fact the demented sonofabitch killed the legal owner of the firearms in order to steal them.

You are correct about the manufacturers. Even if you buy from a factory like I bought a Bushmaster AR-15 a few years ago they are a licensed FFL and will only ship to another FFL.

I don't think he stole the weapons from mom. He was using the household items.
Was it show and tell day by mistake?

What Adam Lanza Took, and Didn't Take, to Sandy Hook Elementary - The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence

December 14, 2012. All of this material had been legally purchased by Nancy Lanza.

FIREARMS

Taken to Sandy Hook Elementary:

Izhmash Saiga 12-gauge semiautomatic shotgun
Bushmaster Model XM15-E2S .223-caliber semiautomatic rifle
Glock 20 10mm semiautomatic handgun
Sig Sauer P226 9mm semiautomatic handgun

Why is he using human TARGETS? Vs. Deer pictures?

Is it as the gun is for killing peoples in mass?