Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffect

[Nova78]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

 

[Rshermr]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

 

[PredFan]

Meh, conservatives have been saying for decades that welfare is not a hand up. It's a hand out.

 

[PredFan]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

Doesn't matter one bit. Whatever the cause of the poverty, studies show that welfare is a "HAND OUT" not a hand up.

 

[Nova78]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

Another piece of worthless dribble from Rshermrsack ,the worthless troll

 

[Oddball]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

Right....The nearly 50 years and hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars pissed away on the socialistic welfare state, in the name of the "War on Poverty", is all the fault of BOOOOOOOSH!

Loser.

 

[uscitizen]

Just let them all die, the Babies that women are not allowed to abort, etc.

 

[AmyNation]

We need to invest in welfare reform/innovation.

 

[uscitizen]

It is much cheaper to abort than to raise a child on welfare.

some like to complain about both.
You can't abort but we don't wanna pay for them to stay alive after birth.

 

[AmyNation]

It is much cheaper to abort than to raise a child on welfare.

some like to complain about both.
You can't abort but we don't wanna pay for them to stay alive after birth.

I have seen people say just that and then act confused when you suggest that stance is a tad hypocritical.

 

[Oddball]

It is much cheaper to abort than to raise a child on welfare.

some like to complain about both.
You can't abort but we don't wanna pay for them to stay alive after birth.

It's even cheaper to raise them on bromides and platitudes.

 

[Nova78]

Now, in case you still don’t understand precisely how much money was spent on bailouts, bond buy-backs and other ‘stimulus’ and ‘growth’ schemes implemented by Obama and the Federal Reserve, here it is in very straightforward, layman’s terms:



Now, ask yourself, what has that $700 Billion + $7.7 Trillion done for you? Do you see any more jobs? Are your wages getting any better? Are the prices of things you purchase going up or down?

 

[Rshermr]

Now, in case you still don’t understand precisely how much money was spent on bailouts, bond buy-backs and other ‘stimulus’ and ‘growth’ schemes implemented by Obama and the Federal Reserve, here it is in very straightforward, layman’s terms:



Now, ask yourself, what has that $700 Billion + $7.7 Trillion done for you? Do you see any more jobs? Are your wages getting any better? Are the prices of things you purchase going up or down?

And your documentation for your numbers is where??? Up your ass, you say??? Makes sense, since that is where your head is. dipshit.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

There is nothing surprising about this. You subsidize something, you get more of it.

 

[Rshermr]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

Doesn't matter one bit. Whatever the cause of the poverty, studies show that welfare is a "HAND OUT" not a hand up.

so you say. And we should believe you for what reason???

 

[Rshermr]

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected | cnsnews.com

“ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.

Federal welfare spending in fiscal year 2011 totaled $668 billion, spread out over 126 programs, while the poverty rate that remains high at 15.1 percent, roughly where it was in 1965, when President Johnson declared a federal War on Poverty.

In 1966, the first year after Johnson declared war on poverty, the national poverty rate was 14.7 percent, according to Census Bureau figures. Over time, the poverty rate has fluctuated in a narrow range between 11 and 15 percent, only falling into the 11 percent range for a few years in the late 1970’s.

That Obama is a good old boy,he just keeps on breaking records all the time....

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

Another piece of worthless dribble from Rshermrsack ,the worthless troll

And, as usual. Nova can not defend his statements. He simply posts juvinile attacks. dipshit.
Do you ever deal in impartial fact based information, nova. Or just dogma.

 

[Nova78]

Now, in case you still don’t understand precisely how much money was spent on bailouts, bond buy-backs and other ‘stimulus’ and ‘growth’ schemes implemented by Obama and the Federal Reserve, here it is in very straightforward, layman’s terms:



Now, ask yourself, what has that $700 Billion + $7.7 Trillion done for you? Do you see any more jobs? Are your wages getting any better? Are the prices of things you purchase going up or down?

And your documentation for your numbers is where??? Up your ass, you say??? Makes sense, since that is where your head is. dipshit.

Goggle it fuck stick......

 

[Nova78]

aAnd there is NOVA, true to his con tool form. Posting a piece from CNS. Really good conservative source, which is normal for nova. He does not believe in impartial sources. Just lives in con sites.
And of course, he sees no problem at all with the fact that obama came after bush 2, who provided him with the great repub recession of 2008. And a repub congress that will not help in any way. But that is Nova. No actual brain activity. Just an attack dog with con tool beliefs. Dipshit.

Another piece of worthless dribble from Rshermrsack ,the worthless troll

And, as usual. Nova can not defend his statements. He simply posts juvinile attacks. dipshit.
Do you ever deal in impartial fact based information, nova. Or just dogma.

What's to defend ? you lick Obamas ass and consider his failures a success,your a loser ...

 

[Rshermr]

Now, in case you still don’t understand precisely how much money was spent on bailouts, bond buy-backs and other ‘stimulus’ and ‘growth’ schemes implemented by Obama and the Federal Reserve, here it is in very straightforward, layman’s terms:



Now, ask yourself, what has that $700 Billion + $7.7 Trillion done for you? Do you see any more jobs? Are your wages getting any better? Are the prices of things you purchase going up or down?

And your documentation for your numbers is where??? Up your ass, you say??? Makes sense, since that is where your head is. dipshit.

Goggle it fuck stick......

So, you said it. But you can not defend it. Your numbers are a fantasy, dipshit.

 

[Rshermr]

Now, in case you still don’t understand precisely how much money was spent on bailouts, bond buy-backs and other ‘stimulus’ and ‘growth’ schemes implemented by Obama and the Federal Reserve, here it is in very straightforward, layman’s terms:



Now, ask yourself, what has that $700 Billion + $7.7 Trillion done for you? Do you see any more jobs? Are your wages getting any better? Are the prices of things you purchase going up or down?

And your documentation for your numbers is where??? Up your ass, you say??? Makes sense, since that is where your head is. dipshit.

Goggle it fuck stick......

Uh oh. Nova is acting angry. That is normal for nova when he knows he is posting dogma, and has no way to defend what he said. Makes him very, very confused. But he can always attack, and insult. But that is nova. No actual signs of brain activity. Just a paid con shill.