Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why on Earth would anyone take out large student loans to attend an expensive four year college when there are much cheaper alternatives (i.e., community and state colleges)?
Why on Earth would anyone take out large student loans to attend an expensive four year college when there are much cheaper alternatives (i.e., community and state colleges)?
Because if you have a better degree, i.e., a degree from a prestigious university, you get a better, higher paying job and more probability for a career where you make a lot more money. A degree from a run of the mill state university, when up against a degree from a prestigious university, will not be competitive when going for really good, high paying jobs.
Why on Earth would anyone take out large student loans to attend an expensive four year college when there are much cheaper alternatives (i.e., community and state colleges)?
Because if you have a better degree, i.e., a degree from a prestigious university, you get a better, higher paying job and more probability for a career where you make a lot more money. A degree from a run of the mill state university, when up against a degree from a prestigious university, will not be competitive when going for really good, high paying jobs.
Having recruited for Silicon Valley companies, that's only partly true.. MANY companies are snobbish about degrees, but ANY degreed student who read a couple "trade magazines" in the library their senior year, will do better in interviews than a fancy pants degreed grad.
Depends on what REAL TANGIBLE effort the student has put into preparing for the job.. MOST ALL universities do a very poor job of that. Would be better to have them take a subscription to a trade journal and get credits for reading it....
Because if you have a better degree, i.e., a degree from a prestigious university, you get a better, higher paying job and more probability for a career where you make a lot more money. A degree from a run of the mill state university, when up against a degree from a prestigious university, will not be competitive when going for really good, high paying jobs.
Having recruited for Silicon Valley companies, that's only partly true.. MANY companies are snobbish about degrees, but ANY degreed student who read a couple "trade magazines" in the library their senior year, will do better in interviews than a fancy pants degreed grad.
Depends on what REAL TANGIBLE effort the student has put into preparing for the job.. MOST ALL universities do a very poor job of that. Would be better to have them take a subscription to a trade journal and get credits for reading it....
It may depend on the type of job and/or company, but my experience is that where one earns a degree is very important. A degree from Harvard is far more influential than a degree from a mediocre state university.
As a community college grad with a law degree, I had no trouble transferring my credits to a better school for ed and 4th year, and was accepted in the MBA program at Carnegie Mellon U (close to Ivy League) with no problem.
There are a couple local doctors who were noted several years ago for their minimum cost strategy: They took accelerated classes in HS, then took the GED as soon as they were eligible (I think it was 16 Y.O.), and went to CC for two years. Then they transferred to a state school for the last two years, and were accepted to more than one med school at a very young age. Top grades, of course.
It can be done "cheaply," but who has that kind of maturity at 17-18 years old? I sure as hell didn't. I got my education after military service.
For students going to college to get a job, colleges and universities are free job training programs for the corporations. Thus, those students are talking our large loans to pay for this job training which benefits corporations, who aren't paying directly, and who are paying less and less indirectly in the form of taxes on corporate profits are reduced.
Those students who go to college or university because they want to learn knowledge end up doing research which greatly benefits everyone.
Now, is increasingly forcing students to take out large student loans of actual benefit to corporations and to America as a whole?
First, when students start work with a large debt, they aren't able to buy as many goods and services that the corporations produce. That causes the corporations to have lower sales, and therefore lower earning, than if the students could start their jobs able to buy more goods and services from the corporations.
Second, students often have to work as part of the package. It is warm to see students trying to do what they think is the right thing. However, there is much to learn and students need to spend full time learning. If they work, that only causes them to come out with an education much less than it would be if they had been able to study full time.
Those of you who identified the entertainment media as part of the problem are of course on to something important. America is quite anti-intellectual, and this is an attitude which has come from the culture. It seems to have started more than a hundred years ago when various writers began pushing the idea that Americans were superior to pointy headed European intellectuals who spent their time thinking.
It has carried forward in many ways. For example, the idea that there is something wrong with teachers and no good red blooded American boy or girl wants to learn things in school. As an example, there was a commercial showing a dried up schoolteacher leading children through an art gallery, and then the commercial saying that the race track it was touting was much more interesting.
It has gone in deep. There is something of a movement that children should not have to do homework, because then they wouldn't have time for a good childhood. My mother deliberately got lower grades in school, rather than the top grades that she could have, because if she had gotten top grades, she would have been unpopular with the other girls. There are stereotypes which really come down hard on boys who do well in school.
As a result, American children score below the children of about 30 other nations in various achievement tests.
So of course, many college students don't go to college to learn, but think they have to go because their parents said so, and it would lead to a job with higher pay.
The solution would be to just give full scholarships to everyone who wants to go to college.
It wouldn't really require all that much of America's 15 trillion dollars per year Gross Domestic Product. A $30,000 per year scholarship per student, assuming 10 million students in college in any one year, would only be 300 billion dollars per year. 300 billion dollars per year would only be 2% of America's Gross Domestic Product. We could easily afford it, and if we reformed the culture so that it encouraged people to be interested in learning knowledge, the combination would produce a much better educational system.
Jim