This is a continuation off a different 9/11 thread, that was being hijacked... so out of respect to that OP, i'll redirect here. This thread should be about LIHOP only. I'd appreciate it if we could do this with no missile talk, no thermite, no pilot-less aircraft claims. It's not that I disregard your tireless work on those issues, it's just that I want to keep them separate. I prefer to focus on what would make the most compelling case, and being honest with myself about what would even be court-admissible in any hypothetical court of law. To me, that case is LIHOP. For which, if anyone is not familiar at this point, the basic bullet points are: They knew the attacks were coming beforehand They greased the skids for them to happen They stonewalled and diverted the entire series of investigations that followed "They" being a few dozen individuals close to, and including, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, top CIA officials, the Joint Chiefs, at least 1 high-level FBI executive, and perhaps many other signatories of the PNAC, on at least some levels. We all know that coincidence theorists go to great lengths to group all 911 alternative theory together, and they do it willfully. Let it be known that two of the most obnoxious coincidence theorists here were offered to debate this topic with respect and classy decor, but both vehemently rejected such notion and brought it to the depths right away. They are welcomed to give it another try at any time, but they appear less than capable, as their homophobia and blind loyalist rage apparently can not be suppressed. So it's game on. They earned it.