Stop separating families!

The law is they are Americans.

No, it's not, especially the 14th amendment!
The 14th is why the court says the little brown babies are born American. That's what it says.
No, it doesn't....a FOOTNOTE in ONE judge's opinion, NOT the consensus opinion, has been mistaken since 1982 to mean so.... Trump will fix that...as NO OTHER Western nation permits this shit!
Post the text of the 14th, that's what they used, more than 100 years ago.

We've already done that numerous times and proven YOU and the rest of the pond scum are wrong! Since when does ONE mans opinion of a 5 person decision, and NEVER mentioned in that consensus decision, become law? AND why never enacted BEFORE 1982?
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.
 
Sorry race warrior, you don't get to just kick out the little brown Americans...
They aren't Americans...
The Supreme Court does not agree with you. They matter, you don't.
Unless of course they make a ruling on the 2nd amendment that goes against what you want then the Supreme Court is wrong, right? Or perhaps you are at peace now with the fact the Supreme Court ruled that Corporations get 1st amendment protection too?
What the court rules is constitutional is. Deal with it, I do.
Sure you do, as I recall weren't you one of the ones lamenting when the Court ruled on Corporations? I know a bunch of your buddies were.And still are.
It's a bad decision but it's the law. Bush v. Gore, same thing...
 
No, it's not, especially the 14th amendment!
The 14th is why the court says the little brown babies are born American. That's what it says.
No, it doesn't....a FOOTNOTE in ONE judge's opinion, NOT the consensus opinion, has been mistaken since 1982 to mean so.... Trump will fix that...as NO OTHER Western nation permits this shit!
Post the text of the 14th, that's what they used, more than 100 years ago.

We've already done that numerous times and proven YOU and the rest of the pond scum are wrong! Since when does ONE mans opinion of a 5 person decision, and NEVER mentioned in that consensus decision, become law? AND why never enacted BEFORE 1982?
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.

And who are the exceptions?
 
The 14th is why the court says the little brown babies are born American. That's what it says.
No, it doesn't....a FOOTNOTE in ONE judge's opinion, NOT the consensus opinion, has been mistaken since 1982 to mean so.... Trump will fix that...as NO OTHER Western nation permits this shit!
Post the text of the 14th, that's what they used, more than 100 years ago.

We've already done that numerous times and proven YOU and the rest of the pond scum are wrong! Since when does ONE mans opinion of a 5 person decision, and NEVER mentioned in that consensus decision, become law? AND why never enacted BEFORE 1982?
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.

And who are the exceptions?
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
 
No, it doesn't....a FOOTNOTE in ONE judge's opinion, NOT the consensus opinion, has been mistaken since 1982 to mean so.... Trump will fix that...as NO OTHER Western nation permits this shit!
Post the text of the 14th, that's what they used, more than 100 years ago.

We've already done that numerous times and proven YOU and the rest of the pond scum are wrong! Since when does ONE mans opinion of a 5 person decision, and NEVER mentioned in that consensus decision, become law? AND why never enacted BEFORE 1982?
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.

And who are the exceptions?
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
 
Post the text of the 14th, that's what they used, more than 100 years ago.

We've already done that numerous times and proven YOU and the rest of the pond scum are wrong! Since when does ONE mans opinion of a 5 person decision, and NEVER mentioned in that consensus decision, become law? AND why never enacted BEFORE 1982?
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.

And who are the exceptions?
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...
 
We've already done that numerous times and proven YOU and the rest of the pond scum are wrong! Since when does ONE mans opinion of a 5 person decision, and NEVER mentioned in that consensus decision, become law? AND why never enacted BEFORE 1982?
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.

And who are the exceptions?
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...

Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION! What permanent BUSINESS that is NOT connected to the foreigners government are ANCHOR BABIES tied to?
 
It starts with "All persons born" and fucks you totally.

And who are the exceptions?
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...

Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION!
Read the dissent and the winning side where it states that it does not matter where mommy and daddy came from...
 
And who are the exceptions?
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...

Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION!
Read the dissent and the winning side where it states that it does not matter where mommy and daddy came from...

Please post it! As the language I printed IS the law, and NOT the dissenting or winning side!
 
Those with immunity, mostly. That is a very small number.
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...

Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION!
Read the dissent and the winning side where it states that it does not matter where mommy and daddy came from...

Please post it! As the language I printed IS the law, and NOT the dissenting or winning side!
Read it for yourself, I'm busy.
 
Wrong....The Citizenship Clause author Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) during the debate on the 14th Amendment that “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

A person born in America from 2 FOREIGNER parents is a foreigner... It can't be any simpler than that!
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...

Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION!
Read the dissent and the winning side where it states that it does not matter where mommy and daddy came from...

Please post it! As the language I printed IS the law, and NOT the dissenting or winning side!
Read it for yourself, I'm busy.

Good, then even an asshole, such as yourself MIGHT understand this...

 
U.S. V. Wong proved that not to be true, which is all that matters...

Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION!
Read the dissent and the winning side where it states that it does not matter where mommy and daddy came from...

Please post it! As the language I printed IS the law, and NOT the dissenting or winning side!
Read it for yourself, I'm busy.

Good, then even an asshole, such as yourself MIGHT understand this...


He's a moron on this, and wrong.
 
They're just trying to reclaim their birthright that was stolen from them - the entire Southwest.
________________________

That's true. And, if they get to feelin strong enough, they can come get it...or try.

The objections that the citizens of this country...our country...have, is that the Mexicans are being aided & abetted in their Invasion, by Barack Obama...which is Treason, as he swore to uphold the laws...and instead is undermining them...for his own political purposes.
 
Good, more bigots to add to my list, AKA the people who agreed with this thread.
 
Wrong Wong stated "Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen"

There was NOTHING here about the parents being ILLEGAL, as Wong's parents were indeed LEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS, with PERMANENT DOMICILE! Anchor babies have NO SUCH PROTECTION!
Read the dissent and the winning side where it states that it does not matter where mommy and daddy came from...

Please post it! As the language I printed IS the law, and NOT the dissenting or winning side!
Read it for yourself, I'm busy.

Good, then even an asshole, such as yourself MIGHT understand this...


He's a moron on this, and wrong.


He's a Constitutional lawyer, and your a welfare cheat.... I go with Levin on this one!
 

Forum List

Back
Top