Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Special Councils are formed by law to investigate crimes - no crime was ever proven This gas always been a fishing expedition and the fish Mueller caught was 'tax fraud', nothing to do with Trump or collusion.You work from outside in, and you follow the money. This is only the beginning. Hang tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride, it always is.
Mueller's whole special counsel is 'illegal'.
By law, Special counsels xan investigate CRIMES - ONLY crimes...and in regards to Trump and collusion NO CRIME HAS EVER BEEN PROVEN:
"Robert Mueller
The indictments of Manafort and Gates now present a unique opportunity to challenge the authority of the special counsel.
Until now, no one had legal “standing” to argue in court that the appointment of Mueller was illegal. The criminal charges change all that.
The two defendants will be able to argue before a judge that Mueller’s appointment by Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein violated the special counsel law.
As I pointed out in a column last May, the law (28 CFR 600) grants legal authority to appoint a special counsel to investigate crimes. Only crimes. He has limited jurisdiction. Yet, in his order appointing Mueller as special counsel (Order No. 3915-2017), Rosenstein directed him to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.” It fails to identify any specific crimes, likely because none are applicable.
To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law."
Still No Evidence Against Trump...
Potential crime. There does not have to be a crime, that's what they are charged with finding out and even if there was a crime, will the evidence prove such a thing before a jury of ones peers? If not it dies with a barely a whimper. You don't have to have a crime to start an investigation. You need the likelihood of a crime. If you find a dead body, you investigate. If you don't find a dead body but the person is missing, you investigate until you find a body, living or dead. That's not a fishing expedition, that's how the criminal justice system works.Special Councils are formed by law to investigate crimes - no crime was ever proven This gas always been a fishing expedition and the fish Mueller caught was 'tax fraud', nothing to do with Trump or collusion.You work from outside in, and you follow the money. This is only the beginning. Hang tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride, it always is.
There is no evidence.
You can't show any.
Mueller couldn't show any on Trump.
The same can not be said for Hillary, as pointed out factually already.
No crime has been proven after 1 year, multiple investigations, and a stacked Council run by a criminal ex-FBI Director that, as evidence released last week shows, hid evidence of widespread Russian crimes and compromised criminal politicians and officials.Potential crime. There does not have to be a crime, that's what they are charged with finding out and even if there was a crime, will the evidence prove such a thing before a jury of ones peers? If not it dies with a barely a whimper. You don't have to have a crime to start an investigation. You need the likelihood of a crime. If you find a dead body, you investigate. If you don't find a dead body but the person is missing, you investigate until you find a body, living or dead. That's not a fishing expedition, that's how the criminal justice system works.Special Councils are formed by law to investigate crimes - no crime was ever proven This gas always been a fishing expedition and the fish Mueller caught was 'tax fraud', nothing to do with Trump or collusion.You work from outside in, and you follow the money. This is only the beginning. Hang tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride, it always is.
There is no evidence.
You can't show any.
Mueller couldn't show any on Trump.
The same can not be said for Hillary, as pointed out factually already.
Paul Manafort, Rick Gates charged in Special Prosecutor's probeYou lie! No charge of obstruction was filed, liar.Yep, no evidence...except pubic confession to obstruction of justice.
"Mueller can't do it..."I am waiting for any snowflake to ptovide evidence of Trump collusion. Mueller can't do it, but you geniuses think you can. Go for it.
2 indictments for tax fraud and one guilty plea for lying to the feds - none connectex to Trump. No evidence of collusion.
The only evidence that exists is held by the right. Evidence was released last week exposing Mueller, Holder, and Obama. Evidence against Hillary has already been listed.
Gowdy spent years on Clinton and the IRS, to prove nothing. This isn't going to happen overnight. Sit back, your rush to judgement isn't making any difference it's just making you look partisan and foolish.No crime has been proven after 1 year, multiple investigations, and a stacked Council run by a criminal ex-FBI Director that, as evidence released last week shows, hid evidence of widespread Russian crimes and compromised criminal politicians and officials.Potential crime. There does not have to be a crime, that's what they are charged with finding out and even if there was a crime, will the evidence prove such a thing before a jury of ones peers? If not it dies with a barely a whimper. You don't have to have a crime to start an investigation. You need the likelihood of a crime. If you find a dead body, you investigate. If you don't find a dead body but the person is missing, you investigate until you find a body, living or dead. That's not a fishing expedition, that's how the criminal justice system works.Special Councils are formed by law to investigate crimes - no crime was ever proven This gas always been a fishing expedition and the fish Mueller caught was 'tax fraud', nothing to do with Trump or collusion.You work from outside in, and you follow the money. This is only the beginning. Hang tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride, it always is.
There is no evidence.
You can't show any.
Mueller couldn't show any on Trump.
The same can not be said for Hillary, as pointed out factually already.
it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."Gregg Jarrett: Still no evidence of Trump-Russia 'collusion' - but Hillary is a different matter
"To put it plainly, Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility. He is being asked to do something that is manifestly unattainable".
Zero evidence, and the Indictnents against Manafort equate to a tax fraud xase, nothing to do with Trump or non-existent Trump Collusion...
Billary Clinton and the case that can be made against her, however, is something different altogether:
"Hillary Clinton
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity."
This is called the 'tip of the iceberg'.
"But that’s not all. Damning new evidenceappears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
If this proves to be a corrupt “pay-to-play” scheme, it would constitute a myriad of crimes, including bribery (18 USC 201-b), mail fraud (18 USC 1341), and wire fraud (18 USC 1343). It might also qualify for racketeering charges (18 USC 1961-1968), if her foundation is determined to have been used as a criminal enterprise."
Snowflajes have said 'not yet but just wait' for the last year...and their last hope - Mueller - could not come up with 1 indictment of Trump or Trump collusion."Mueller can't do it..."I am waiting for any snowflake to ptovide evidence of Trump collusion. Mueller can't do it, but you geniuses think you can. Go for it.
2 indictments for tax fraud and one guilty plea for lying to the feds - none connectex to Trump. No evidence of collusion.
The only evidence that exists is held by the right. Evidence was released last week exposing Mueller, Holder, and Obama. Evidence against Hillary has already been listed.
No, Mueller has yet to do it, if he can at all. Not the same thing, We do not know yet, it doesn't work that way. It could take months, years, or it might never be there. The Grand Jury works on one piece of the puzzle at a time. It's a tower of blocks. You start at the bottom and build towards the top until it tips over. No one knows what they know yet. Only time will tell.
Guilt regarding Hillary's server was proven the monent the FBI found thousands of official documents she never turned in as required by law.Gowdy spent years on Clinton and the IRS, to prove nothing. This isn't going to happen overnight. Sit back, your rush to judgement isn't making any difference it's just making you look partisan and foolish.No crime has been proven after 1 year, multiple investigations, and a stacked Council run by a criminal ex-FBI Director that, as evidence released last week shows, hid evidence of widespread Russian crimes and compromised criminal politicians and officials.Potential crime. There does not have to be a crime, that's what they are charged with finding out and even if there was a crime, will the evidence prove such a thing before a jury of ones peers? If not it dies with a barely a whimper. You don't have to have a crime to start an investigation. You need the likelihood of a crime. If you find a dead body, you investigate. If you don't find a dead body but the person is missing, you investigate until you find a body, living or dead. That's not a fishing expedition, that's how the criminal justice system works.Special Councils are formed by law to investigate crimes - no crime was ever proven This gas always been a fishing expedition and the fish Mueller caught was 'tax fraud', nothing to do with Trump or collusion.You work from outside in, and you follow the money. This is only the beginning. Hang tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride, it always is.
There is no evidence.
You can't show any.
Mueller couldn't show any on Trump.
The same can not be said for Hillary, as pointed out factually already.
You lie! No charge of obstruction was filed, liar.Yep, no evidence...except pubic confession to obstruction of justice.
'Not yet'...'Not yet... that is all we have heard after a year, multiple investigations, and a stacked Council.You lie! No charge of obstruction was filed, liar.Yep, no evidence...except pubic confession to obstruction of justice.
Not yet, but confession is on file, so when you say "no evidence" you are full of it.
Trump fired Comey because of Russia investigation, that's a fact.
Don't go there. Trump's folks have already been caught using private email servers. Stick to the story of the day, Manafort and Gates, and the guy with the funny Greek name.Guilt regarding Hillary's server was proven the monent the FBI found thousands of official documents she never turned in as required by law.Gowdy spent years on Clinton and the IRS, to prove nothing. This isn't going to happen overnight. Sit back, your rush to judgement isn't making any difference it's just making you look partisan and foolish.No crime has been proven after 1 year, multiple investigations, and a stacked Council run by a criminal ex-FBI Director that, as evidence released last week shows, hid evidence of widespread Russian crimes and compromised criminal politicians and officials.Potential crime. There does not have to be a crime, that's what they are charged with finding out and even if there was a crime, will the evidence prove such a thing before a jury of ones peers? If not it dies with a barely a whimper. You don't have to have a crime to start an investigation. You need the likelihood of a crime. If you find a dead body, you investigate. If you don't find a dead body but the person is missing, you investigate until you find a body, living or dead. That's not a fishing expedition, that's how the criminal justice system works.Special Councils are formed by law to investigate crimes - no crime was ever proven This gas always been a fishing expedition and the fish Mueller caught was 'tax fraud', nothing to do with Trump or collusion.You work from outside in, and you follow the money. This is only the beginning. Hang tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride, it always is.
There is no evidence.
You can't show any.
Mueller couldn't show any on Trump.
The same can not be said for Hillary, as pointed out factually already.
bad day eh laky? not the news you were hoping for was it? instead it incriminated the clinton crime family
Your repeated NaziCon lies are hilarious!
When the evidence is solid I don't care if it takes down the Lord God himself. Only time will tell. Clear?Snowflajes have said 'not yet but just wait' for the last year...and their last hope - Mueller - could not come up with 1 indictment of Trump or Trump collusion."Mueller can't do it..."I am waiting for any snowflake to ptovide evidence of Trump collusion. Mueller can't do it, but you geniuses think you can. Go for it.
2 indictments for tax fraud and one guilty plea for lying to the feds - none connectex to Trump. No evidence of collusion.
The only evidence that exists is held by the right. Evidence was released last week exposing Mueller, Holder, and Obama. Evidence against Hillary has already been listed.
No, Mueller has yet to do it, if he can at all. Not the same thing, We do not know yet, it doesn't work that way. It could take months, years, or it might never be there. The Grand Jury works on one piece of the puzzle at a time. It's a tower of blocks. You start at the bottom and build towards the top until it tips over. No one knows what they know yet. Only time will tell.
There is no evidence against Trump...but there us on Hillary.
Snowflakes like you refusing to accept the evidence against Hillary proves this has never been about the 'Russian threat' but everything about your butt-hurt over Hillary's loss and hatred of Trump.
Do tell? No Clinton person was indicted today so?bad day eh laky? not the news you were hoping for was it? instead it incriminated the clinton crime family
Your repeated NaziCon lies are hilarious!
