Toro
Diamond Member
World's leading physicist debunks twoofers?
Heck, world's worst physicist could do that.
Heck, world's worst physicist could do that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BTW THE WAY THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT :and stick to the topic of planes and buildings thei has nothing to do with alleged witnesses or alleged people on planes. We are talking about planes not how much cheese has to be on the moon) Any response outside of planes and buildings will be disregarded as nonresponsive and a dodge. You wanna play this game you better stick to the rules.so demand for proof is arguing from ignorance in your fucked up world, noted
I AM demanding evidence, from you. You have made claims provide verifiable evidence your claims are true.
demand to your hearts content when I produce an official report I will give it to you. You want to support the official story then fucking support it, you have posted NO EVIDENCE.
I CLAIM YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE AND YOU WANT ME TO GET YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU?
ARE YOU INSANE?
Enjoy your ride on the titanic
BTW THE WAY THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT :and stick to the topic of planes and buildings thei has nothing to do with alleged witnesses or alleged people on planes. We are talking about planes not how much cheese has to be on the moon) Any response outside of planes and buildings will be disregarded as nonresponsive and a dodge. You wanna play this game you better stick to the rules.I AM demanding evidence, from you. You have made claims provide verifiable evidence your claims are true.
demand to your hearts content when I produce an official report I will give it to you. You want to support the official story then fucking support it, you have posted NO EVIDENCE.
I CLAIM YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE AND YOU WANT ME TO GET YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU?
ARE YOU INSANE?
Enjoy your ride on the titanic
IT'S ABOUT YOUR NO PLANES FAIRY TALE AND ANYTHING PRESENTED TO REFUTE IT.
If you don't like the way the thread is going then leave.
do you now how to write a coherent sentence?BTW THE WAY THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT :and stick to the topic of planes and buildings thei has nothing to do with alleged witnesses or alleged people on planes. We are talking about planes not how much cheese has to be on the moon) Any response outside of planes and buildings will be disregarded as nonresponsive and a dodge. You wanna play this game you better stick to the rules.demand to your hearts content when I produce an official report I will give it to you. You want to support the official story then fucking support it, you have posted NO EVIDENCE.
I CLAIM YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE AND YOU WANT ME TO GET YOUR EVIDENCE FOR YOU?
ARE YOU INSANE?
Enjoy your ride on the titanic
IT'S ABOUT YOUR NO PLANES FAIRY TALE AND ANYTHING PRESENTED TO REFUTE IT.
If you don't like the way the thread is going then leave.
I have to keep reminding you of that glad you are getting a clue, so post your plane evidence any time.
do you now how to write a coherent sentence?BTW THE WAY THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT :and stick to the topic of planes and buildings thei has nothing to do with alleged witnesses or alleged people on planes. We are talking about planes not how much cheese has to be on the moon) Any response outside of planes and buildings will be disregarded as nonresponsive and a dodge. You wanna play this game you better stick to the rules.
IT'S ABOUT YOUR NO PLANES FAIRY TALE AND ANYTHING PRESENTED TO REFUTE IT.
If you don't like the way the thread is going then leave.
I have to keep reminding you of that glad you are getting a clue, so post your plane evidence any time.
the one above is no proof that you do.
My oh my oh my........ A real super duper twoofer nut case we have here....
Just what kind of Proof of the four planes does it require?
Or do those pics need to be certified and signed by 50 witnesses?
Tell us Tojo, what will you accept as proof...
By the way if you see planes going in one side of the buildings and coming out the other side intact, you are one in 600 Billion..... You are special.....
Come on dude if videos of planes and people on the ground seeing planes doesn't count as evidence of planes to the tin-hatter, pictures of pieces of planes won't either.
Come on dude if videos of planes and people on the ground seeing planes doesn't count as evidence of planes to the tin-hatter, pictures of pieces of planes won't either.
Oh?
did someone post bonafide videos of planes? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide witness accounts? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide plane parts? I dont see any.
invisible evidence! nice concept!
have you considered working for the government?
Come on dude if videos of planes and people on the ground seeing planes doesn't count as evidence of planes to the tin-hatter, pictures of pieces of planes won't either.
Oh?
did someone post bonafide videos of planes? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide witness accounts? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide plane parts? I dont see any.
invisible evidence! nice concept!
have you considered working for the government?
Come on dude if videos of planes and people on the ground seeing planes doesn't count as evidence of planes to the tin-hatter, pictures of pieces of planes won't either.
Oh?
did someone post bonafide videos of planes? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide witness accounts? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide plane parts? I dont see any.
invisible evidence! nice concept!
have you considered working for the government?
How's this. Why don't you define what you mean when you say bonafide? At this point you are pretty much hiding what you think constitutes real evidence from everyone you are talking to here. So what, exactly, would be bonafide videos, witness accounts or plane parts? What would separate the bonafide evidence from that you've so far been shown?
Every time someone gives you an example of video or picture evidence (at least if it doesn't conform to your belief about events) you say it isn't real, but don't explain what differentiates it from real evidence.
Come on dude if videos of planes and people on the ground seeing planes doesn't count as evidence of planes to the tin-hatter, pictures of pieces of planes won't either.
Oh?
did someone post bonafide videos of planes? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide witness accounts? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide plane parts? I dont see any.
invisible evidence! nice concept!
have you considered working for the government?
How's this. Why don't you define what you mean when you say bonafide? At this point you are pretty much hiding what you think constitutes real evidence from everyone you are talking to here. So what, exactly, would be bonafide videos, witness accounts or plane parts? What would separate the bonafide evidence from that you've so far been shown?
Every time someone gives you an example of video or picture evidence (at least if it doesn't conform to your belief about events) you say it isn't real, but don't explain what differentiates it from real evidence.
Have you considered checking yourself into a facility that can help with your mental illness? There are probably some programs that could help offset the costs.have you considered working for the government?
Come on dude if videos of planes and people on the ground seeing planes doesn't count as evidence of planes to the tin-hatter, pictures of pieces of planes won't either.
Oh?
did someone post bonafide videos of planes? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide witness accounts? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide plane parts? I dont see any.
invisible evidence! nice concept!
have you considered working for the government?
Yes, yes they did, in fact some were even used as evidence in court....You're to stupid for me to bother with...go back to mommies basement......
Case closed.......
Oh?
did someone post bonafide videos of planes? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide witness accounts? I dont see any.
did someone post bonafide plane parts? I dont see any.
invisible evidence! nice concept!
have you considered working for the government?
How's this. Why don't you define what you mean when you say bonafide? At this point you are pretty much hiding what you think constitutes real evidence from everyone you are talking to here. So what, exactly, would be bonafide videos, witness accounts or plane parts? What would separate the bonafide evidence from that you've so far been shown?
Every time someone gives you an example of video or picture evidence (at least if it doesn't conform to your belief about events) you say it isn't real, but don't explain what differentiates it from real evidence.
Only evidence properly submitted that can pass challenge. Depending on the case a court can accept government provided data without full review. Unless challenged. In which case requires strict conformamce as ollie said, certified, sealed, sworn, and duly recorded by the curt as such. I challenge ALL 911 so called evidence.
anything less is just your average everyday belches beer farts.
So you consider courts the only arbiter of truth?
If someone tells you they see an event, do you ask them if they have certified, sealed, sworn evidence from a court?
What makes a court able to determine the truth of, say, video evidence? Wouldn't it be better to take it before someone who works in that field?
Also, again, you are setting a bar that cannot be reached. Convenient for you. Since the vast majority of people find the evidence overwhelming that planes did, in fact, hit the towers, there is little-to-no possibility that a court will ever hear a case about the possibility it was all a hoax. Because of that, you can continue to chirp about needing 'bonafide' evidence because such evidence, by the arbitrary standards you desire, will never exist to be presented to you.
I am pretty certain that any court hearing a case about the 9/11 attacks would accept the video and witness evidence that it did, in fact, happen.
At least most of the truthers accept the reality that planes hit the towers; they just don't think the planes caused the collapses.
How's this. Why don't you define what you mean when you say bonafide? At this point you are pretty much hiding what you think constitutes real evidence from everyone you are talking to here. So what, exactly, would be bonafide videos, witness accounts or plane parts? What would separate the bonafide evidence from that you've so far been shown?
Every time someone gives you an example of video or picture evidence (at least if it doesn't conform to your belief about events) you say it isn't real, but don't explain what differentiates it from real evidence.
Only evidence properly submitted that can pass challenge. Depending on the case a court can accept government provided data without full review. Unless challenged. In which case requires strict conformamce as ollie said, certified, sealed, sworn, and duly recorded by the curt as such. I challenge ALL 911 so called evidence.
anything less is just your average everyday belches beer farts.
So you consider courts the only arbiter of truth?
If someone tells you they see an event, do you ask them if they have certified, sealed, sworn evidence from a court?
What makes a court able to determine the truth of, say, video evidence? Wouldn't it be better to take it before someone who works in that field?
Also, again, you are setting a bar that cannot be reached. Convenient for you. Since the vast majority of people find the evidence overwhelming that planes did, in fact, hit the towers, there is little-to-no possibility that a court will ever hear a case about the possibility it was all a hoax. Because of that, you can continue to chirp about needing 'bonafide' evidence because such evidence, by the arbitrary standards you desire, will never exist to be presented to you.
I am pretty certain that any court hearing a case about the 9/11 attacks would accept the video and witness evidence that it did, in fact, happen.
At least most of the truthers accept the reality that planes hit the towers; they just don't think the planes caused the collapses.