Steven Dutch, worlds leading Physicist debunks twoofer

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by slackjawed, Feb 19, 2010.

  1. slackjawed
    Offline

    slackjawed Self deported

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,307
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    15th congressional district of Arizona
    Ratings:
    +645
    from his article;

    "No amount of evidence will dissuade a conspiracy theorist, but when they appeal to scientific evidence, they're fair game. And the 9-11 conspiracy sites have some very strange science.

    9-11 conspirators seem to be a mix of liberals still smarting over 2000 and ultra-conservatives angry that George Bush Jr. hasn't opened the national parks to a land rush. But if Dubya orchestrated a massive conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Center as a pretext for launching a Mideast War, why didn't he pull off the far simpler trick of faking the discovery of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Think of it - his biggest political liability could have been avoided with a piddling investment in special effects, Bush would be seen as America's savior, his strategy would be completely vindicated, and he'd be politically unassailable. All it would take would be spritzing an empty factory with the ingredients for nerve gas, with just enough cross-contamination to create a whiff of the real thing. Yet for some strange reason he didn't do it.
    Cause and Effect

    We live in a universe of patterns. Once a pattern is established, the burden of proof is on people who claim the pattern does not hold. When some philosopher of science points out that we cannot prove that the sun will rise tomorrow, I say he's absolutely right. There is no way to prove axiomatically that the sun will rise tomorrow, and nobody in science cares in the slightest. When the sun doesn't rise as scheduled, call me. Until then I absolutely refuse to waste time worrying about it. When Immanuel Velikovsky claimed the planets underwent wild disturbances in their orbits, the burden of proof was on him to show that it happened. The burden was not on scientists to show it didn't.

    In the case of 9-11, we have planes hitting the World Trade Center and the buildings failing at precisely the level of impact. The observational evidence clearly shows a cause and effect relationship."



    more;

    Nutty 9-11 Physics
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. psikeyhackr
    Offline

    psikeyhackr VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Messages:
    745
    Thanks Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +71
    The world's leading physicist seems to have entirely misplaced the Conservation of Momentum even though he mentions momentum a number of times.

    psik
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. KokomoJojo
    Offline

    KokomoJojo VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,724
    Thanks Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +170

    proper examinations by "experts" today is done by asking all the wrong questions using the wrong presumptions often based upon pure speculation then coming to incomplete conclusions, and in the case of the government, then declaring their analysis data sets outside public purview. question anything outside their artificially assigned peep hole boundaries of course is a conspiracy theory. you will find that is how its done in all government liable matters or complicit operations, likewise the courts, kelo among several others comes to mind.

    The kennedy assassination, waco, murrah, 911 for instance glow in the dark with investigative misconduct and malfeasance.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2013
  4. SAYIT
    Online

    SAYIT Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Messages:
    14,683
    Thanks Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,746
    Hmmm .... so whose opinion to believe? That of Piker and KooKoo or of one of the planet's leading physicists?
    This is a real toughie.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. KokomoJojo
    Offline

    KokomoJojo VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,724
    Thanks Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +170

    if you read his work he very selectively picked dumbass theories to comment about. Bring him over here so we can introduce him to the irrefutable arguments, however you wont get any top physicist real or imagined to go against the government unless they are about to retire because physcists get most and in many cases all their work through the government. DUH
     
  6. Montrovant
    Offline

    Montrovant Fuzzy bears!

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    11,294
    Thanks Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Beyond the Veil
    Ratings:
    +3,389
    Irrefutable arguments such as there were no actual planes on 9/11? Those kinds of arguments? :eusa_whistle:
     
  7. KokomoJojo
    Offline

    KokomoJojo VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,724
    Thanks Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +170
    within your nano box thinking ability and skill set yeh

    no one can form a discussion with someone who is a slave to their nanobox
     
  8. SteadyMercury
    Offline

    SteadyMercury Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    4,730
    Thanks Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,526
    No actual planes, thousands of liars on the ground in NYC, a bunch of missing passengers and flight crews, and a government that was smart enough to pull of this massive conspiracy but not clever enough to make their fake planes blow up correctly in the dozens of fake videos they produced.

    Yup, that is the most likely answer.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,589
    Thanks Received:
    5,907
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,016
    What I like is the claims made that something did NOT happen but no claim of what DID happen.

    Or when they do make a claim of what supposedly happened you can so easily prove it simply is not true.
     
  10. LA RAM FAN
    Online

    LA RAM FAN Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    20,802
    Thanks Received:
    923
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,762
    :clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

    the agent trolls like slackass are getting desperate that the truth is getting out on 9/11
    just like all thoise other events have been exposed so his handlers are sending him here in desperation posting propaganda.This troll slackass STILL endorces the lies of the warren commission that oswald did it even though the HSCA investigation in the 70's concluded the warren commission was wrong and there were two shooters.one on the grassy knoll.

    http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-70-s-there-was-a-conspiracy-to-kill-jfk.html
    :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:

    slackass obviously ditched junior high school science classes because in both cases,the laws of physics scientists have gone by for thousands of years was violated both times.:lol:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2013

Share This Page