Stephen Crowder, Top 5 AR-15 myths...banning them is a Trojan Horse...

[2aguy]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....

The anti gunners want them too....

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Steven Crowder doesn't have to tell anyone with half a brain who understands the creep of legislation. AR-15's today and everything else tomorrow.
NEVER give a GD inch!

 

[Hossfly]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

 

[Hossfly]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

 

[Crixus]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Well, take two folks. Let’s say for modern times so we have one adult woman and one adult male of a rage fitness.


So the task is to arm these folks with a mass produced weapon that they can learn to shoot and maintain With a minimum amount of training. The M16 is a dummy’s weapon. Recoil is a huge issue. Weight, and ease and cost of production was part of it to.


It’s always been the trend in America that the rifle the military issues end up being population civilian sporting weapons. This was the case when muskets were issued just like now.


We have a people problem, not a a gun problem.

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Well, take two folks. Let’s say for modern times so we have one adult woman and one adult male of a rage fitness.


So the task is to arm these folks with a mass produced weapon that they can learn to shoot and maintain With a minimum amount of training. The M16 is a dummy’s weapon. Recoil is a huge issue. Weight, and ease and cost of production was part of it to.


It’s always been the trend in America that the rifle the military issues end up being population civilian sporting weapons. This was the case when muskets were issued just like now.


We have a people problem, not a a gun problem.

That will probably make sense to a gun nut, but not so much for gun owners with common sense.

 

[Crixus]

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Well, take two folks. Let’s say for modern times so we have one adult woman and one adult male of a rage fitness.


So the task is to arm these folks with a mass produced weapon that they can learn to shoot and maintain With a minimum amount of training. The M16 is a dummy’s weapon. Recoil is a huge issue. Weight, and ease and cost of production was part of it to.


It’s always been the trend in America that the rifle the military issues end up being population civilian sporting weapons. This was the case when muskets were issued just like now.


We have a people problem, not a a gun problem.

That will probably make sense to a gun nut, but not so much for gun owners with common sense.

But see? That’s where you miss it. Responsible gun owners with common sense compleatly get it. They are the ones who own the AR15. Maybe because that was the first rifle they got acquainted with when they did ROTC or joined the military? It’s those who are not responsible and lack common sense who cause all the trouble. 20 years ago it was AK’s. That was the monster under the bed waiting to jump out and eat a litter of deep fried pit bull puppies. There is nothing common sensical about how this conversation is happening.

 

[2aguy]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

If they don't have the full auto, and I don't even think the M4 has that anymore, then they aren't identical......you are such a doofus.

AR-15s are civilian rifles also used by police, they are the most common rifle in the country and so are the most obvious rifle protected by our 2nd Amendment....

You guys want all the rifles and all the pistols......we know this, and we are going to fight you all the way...

 

[2aguy]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Dip shit.....a semi auto rifle takes a magazine, and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger without having to manually reload after every single shot.......every single semi auto rifle......the AR-15 is no different from any of those other rifles...which is why you want to ban it...if you get the AR-15 that gives you the momentum to go after every other rifle and pistol that also takes a magazine and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger...and that is your goal.....

The AR-15 is a civilian rifle, that the police also use....it is no different than any other rifle that is also a semi auto rifle....or a semi auto pistol.....

They picked the look of the rifle because it was the cheapest contract......the government bought it......you are such a doofus...

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

If they don't have the full auto, and I don't even think the M4 has that anymore, then they aren't identical......you are such a doofus.

AR-15s are civilian rifles also used by police, they are the most common rifle in the country and so are the most obvious rifle protected by our 2nd Amendment....

You guys want all the rifles and all the pistols......we know this, and we are going to fight you all the way...

Again, you have no idea what you are talking about. The AR couldn't have even been built until the M16 patents ran out.

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Dip shit.....a semi auto rifle takes a magazine, and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger without having to manually reload after every single shot.......every single semi auto rifle......the AR-15 is no different from any of those other rifles...which is why you want to ban it...if you get the AR-15 that gives you the momentum to go after every other rifle and pistol that also takes a magazine and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger...and that is your goal.....

The AR-15 is a civilian rifle, that the police also use....it is no different than any other rifle that is also a semi auto rifle....or a semi auto pistol.....

They picked the look of the rifle because it was the cheapest contract......the government bought it......you are such a doofus...

If it is no different, why are you so adamant that it is needed? The AR is a slightly modified clone of the M16. It's not the same as any other simi.

 

[Hossfly]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

If they don't have the full auto, and I don't even think the M4 has that anymore, then they aren't identical......you are such a doofus.

AR-15s are civilian rifles also used by police, they are the most common rifle in the country and so are the most obvious rifle protected by our 2nd Amendment....

You guys want all the rifles and all the pistols......we know this, and we are going to fight you all the way...

Again, you have no idea what you are talking about. The AR couldn't have even been built until the M16 patents ran out.

HISTORY

INVENTIONS
Q:
Who invented the M16 rifle?
A:
QUICK ANSWER

Eugene Morrison Stoner is credited with inventing the American M16 while working as chief engineer for ArmaLite. The M16 became the standard-issue assault rifle of the U.S. military in 1963.

CONTINUE READING
KEEP LEARNING

• Who invented the rifle?
• Who invented the repeating rifle?
• Who invented the first bolt-action rifle?

[paste:font size="4"]LEARN MORE ABOUT INVENTIONS
Sources:

nytimes.com

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Skull Pilot]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Bottom line the AR i5 is exactly the same as any other semiautomatic rifle but for the materials of the stock and a couple of accessories

 

[2aguy]

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Dip shit.....a semi auto rifle takes a magazine, and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger without having to manually reload after every single shot.......every single semi auto rifle......the AR-15 is no different from any of those other rifles...which is why you want to ban it...if you get the AR-15 that gives you the momentum to go after every other rifle and pistol that also takes a magazine and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger...and that is your goal.....

The AR-15 is a civilian rifle, that the police also use....it is no different than any other rifle that is also a semi auto rifle....or a semi auto pistol.....

They picked the look of the rifle because it was the cheapest contract......the government bought it......you are such a doofus...

If it is no different, why are you so adamant that it is needed? The AR is a slightly modified clone of the M16. It's not the same as any other simi.

Moron...you know it is exactly the same thing as any other semi auto rifle......the exact same mechanism.....which is why you need to get it banned......then you can come back and state the other rifles need to go too......and the pistols......

You morons have already stated on various threads that you want all semi auto weapons banned....you let the truth out.....we already knew it, but the uninformed didn't know....

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

If they don't have the full auto, and I don't even think the M4 has that anymore, then they aren't identical......you are such a doofus.

AR-15s are civilian rifles also used by police, they are the most common rifle in the country and so are the most obvious rifle protected by our 2nd Amendment....

You guys want all the rifles and all the pistols......we know this, and we are going to fight you all the way...

Again, you have no idea what you are talking about. The AR couldn't have even been built until the M16 patents ran out.

HISTORY

INVENTIONS
Q:
Who invented the M16 rifle?
A:
QUICK ANSWER

Eugene Morrison Stoner is credited with inventing the American M16 while working as chief engineer for ArmaLite. The M16 became the standard-issue assault rifle of the U.S. military in 1963.

CONTINUE READING
KEEP LEARNING

• Who invented the rifle?
• Who invented the repeating rifle?
• Who invented the first bolt-action rifle?

[paste:font size="4"]LEARN MORE ABOUT INVENTIONS
Sources:

nytimes.com

en.wikipedia.org

I've done a bit of research on the AR15 today. Some of the things I thought were wrong. However, the fact that the AR 15 is a slightly modified clone of the military M16 assault rifle has not changed. We don't need military assault rifles on the street. even those that are slightly modified
AR 15 Rifle - A Brief History & Historical Time Line

 

[BULLDOG]

Crowder nails it....

He demonstrates the rate of fire with a .357 lever action rifle.....he shows a semi auto shotgun....
.
The anti gunners want them too....

Charles Whitman didn't have an AR-15. He used an M-1 carbine. People give the AR-15 too much credit.

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Bottom line the AR i5 is exactly the same as any other semiautomatic rifle but for the materials of the stock and a couple of accessories

Then why did the military pick a slightly modified version of that design for the M16? It's not the same as any other simiauto.

 

[BULLDOG]

So why did the US military pick the fully auto version of the AR to be their goto combat weapon? The AR and the M16 are identical other than the full auto capability. ARs weren't even built until the M16 patent ran out.

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Dip shit.....a semi auto rifle takes a magazine, and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger without having to manually reload after every single shot.......every single semi auto rifle......the AR-15 is no different from any of those other rifles...which is why you want to ban it...if you get the AR-15 that gives you the momentum to go after every other rifle and pistol that also takes a magazine and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger...and that is your goal.....

The AR-15 is a civilian rifle, that the police also use....it is no different than any other rifle that is also a semi auto rifle....or a semi auto pistol.....

They picked the look of the rifle because it was the cheapest contract......the government bought it......you are such a doofus...

If it is no different, why are you so adamant that it is needed? The AR is a slightly modified clone of the M16. It's not the same as any other simi.

Moron...you know it is exactly the same thing as any other semi auto rifle......the exact same mechanism.....which is why you need to get it banned......then you can come back and state the other rifles need to go too......and the pistols......

You morons have already stated on various threads that you want all semi auto weapons banned....you let the truth out.....we already knew it, but the uninformed didn't know....

Liar. Post a link to me saying all semiautomatic rifles should be banned, or admit you are full of shit.

 

[2aguy]

AR-15 was the prototype to the M-16. The AR-15 didn't have a forward assist assembly and the Army wouldn't buy it. A forward assist assembly was added, the Army bought it and the AR-15 was re-designated M-16 because Army weapons have an M preceding the number. I was issued one of the first M-16s in July 1965.

Bottom line, the AR15 is the same design as an M16 with the multiple fire disabled. The US military chose that design as it's goto combat weapon. If it's just like any other semiauto, why did the military pick that particular design over any other simiauto?

Dip shit.....a semi auto rifle takes a magazine, and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger without having to manually reload after every single shot.......every single semi auto rifle......the AR-15 is no different from any of those other rifles...which is why you want to ban it...if you get the AR-15 that gives you the momentum to go after every other rifle and pistol that also takes a magazine and fires one bullet for each pull of the trigger...and that is your goal.....

The AR-15 is a civilian rifle, that the police also use....it is no different than any other rifle that is also a semi auto rifle....or a semi auto pistol.....

They picked the look of the rifle because it was the cheapest contract......the government bought it......you are such a doofus...

If it is no different, why are you so adamant that it is needed? The AR is a slightly modified clone of the M16. It's not the same as any other simi.

Moron...you know it is exactly the same thing as any other semi auto rifle......the exact same mechanism.....which is why you need to get it banned......then you can come back and state the other rifles need to go too......and the pistols......

You morons have already stated on various threads that you want all semi auto weapons banned....you let the truth out.....we already knew it, but the uninformed didn't know....

Liar. Post a link to me saying all semiautomatic rifles should be banned, or admit you are full of shit.

If you want to ban the AR-15 you want to ban them all, since there is no difference between the semi auto AR-15 and any other semi auto rifle or pistol......once you get the AR-15, you will take the next one on the list.......