States Have a Valid Legal Argument to Defy Gay Marriage

Does even a mere voter have the right to have their vote count on regulating marriage locally?

  • Yes, voting is a civil right, if violated, can be challenged up to SCOTUS.

  • No, a voter has no right to insist their vote counts.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Ah, another page disappears.

For context...

Cute pictures. Now post ones with two lesbians holding a son and two gay men holding a daughter. Then we'll get busy talking about the Prince's Trust survey and all those young adults reporting that a lack of the same gender role model in their homes left them with a sense of not belonging, and suicidal &/or prone to alcoholism, drug abuse and indigency...

Here's an example of what I'm talking about, from this thread: Boy Drugged By Lesbian "Parents" To Be A Girl | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The boy is probably going along with this so he can finally experience a sense of mattering in a functioning adult world.. Now THERE'S a happy, well-adjusted son of lesbians..

Lesbodruggedboy_zps6ea79551.jpg


More gibberish. The Prince Trust study, by your own admission, doesn't measure the effects of any kind of parenting. It never even mentions mothers and fathers. Or gays. Or gay parenting...But good same sex role models. With every example offered of no good same sex rolemodel being a child of a SINGLE parent. With the Prince Trust study citing sources outside the family as being good same sex role models....You're again offering us imaginary, delusional bullshit in yet another thumb sucker thread. Where you know you're full of shit. We know you're full of shit. And you know we know you're full of shit...But you keep repeating this nonsense to yourself as a form of self soothing.

But we're talking about how a state would view the preponderence of evidence. And the preponderence of evidence comes down heavily on the side of children needing their same gender in a married home to grow up psychologically "mattering".. That's a very deep wound to internalize..."not mattering in a functioning adult world". That is the daily implied message to a child of the opposite gender growing up in a gay home, no matter how many sugar cookies or designer clothes the "parents" buy him or her to smooth over the wounds..

That little boy with dirt on the knees of his pink stretch pants looks clearly shattered with his hands clasped over his crotch, contemplating chopping off his dick to please "his daily adult world of who matters"...that's how deep that wound is..
 
Ah, another page disappears.

For context...

Cute pictures. Now post ones with two lesbians holding a son and two gay men holding a daughter. Then we'll get busy talking about the Prince's Trust survey and all those young adults reporting that a lack of the same gender role model in their homes left them with a sense of not belonging, and suicidal &/or prone to alcoholism, drug abuse and indigency...

Here's an example of what I'm talking about, from this thread: Boy Drugged By Lesbian "Parents" To Be A Girl | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The boy is probably going along with this so he can finally experience a sense of mattering in a functioning adult world.. Now THERE'S a happy, well-adjusted son of lesbians..

Lesbodruggedboy_zps6ea79551.jpg

And for context, you've plucked one frame out of a video and made up a narrative about it. When you watch the video, the kid is merely moving in her seat. You made up all of your

Again, you're just recycling the same tired bullshit over and over. The Prince Trust study doesn't say a thing that you do. It doesn't measure the effects of any kind of parenting, by your own admission. It never even mentions mothers and fathers.

You're offering us the hallucination, the same lies and debunked nonsense that didn't work the last time you spewed them. We've read the prince trust study. We know you're wrong. You've read the prince trust study. You know you're wrong. And you know we know you're wrong.

This entire thread is just a thumb sucking, self soothing exercise. Where you repeat your lies to yourself. And no one is believing you. Including you.

But we're talking about how a state would view the preponderence of evidence. And the preponderence of evidence comes down heavily on the side of children needing their same gender in a married home to grow up psychologically "mattering".. That's a very deep wound to internalize..."not mattering in a functioning adult world". That is the daily implied message to a child of the opposite gender growing up in a gay home, no matter how many sugar cookies or designer clothes the "parents" buy him or her to smooth over the wounds..

You keep using legal terms as if you know what they mean. No, the proponderance of evidence doesn't support your conclusion. The chidlren of same sex parents are healthy, as affirmed by a litany of studies.

You ignoring evidence isn't the preponderance of evidence. You don't know what the term means. And your claims have nothing to do with the law. Which is why you're always wrong and your every legal prediction has been meaningless shit.

Worse, nothing you've proposed would effect any issue you claim to be addressing. As denying marriage to same sex parents doesn't mean that their children magically have opposite sex parents. It only guarantees that these children will never have married parents. Which hurts them. By the 10s of thousands. And doesn't help a single child.

Absolutely destroying your entire argument.

And finally, no one is required to have kids in order to be married. Making your denial of marriage more pseudo-legal gibberish. As the standard you're using to deny them marriage isn't one that ANYONE is held to.

You've literally made it up. And your imagination is legally irrelevant. You can't get around that. And while you may not be able to distinguish your imagination from legal evidence, the courts can. Which is why your record of predicting the outcome of cases is perfectly wrong.

Every case. Every single time. You are always wrong.
 
Ah, another page disappears.

For context...

Cute pictures. Now post ones with two lesbians holding a son and two gay men holding a daughter. Then we'll get busy talking about the Prince's Trust survey and all those young adults reporting that a lack of the same gender role model in their homes left them with a sense of not belonging, and suicidal &/or prone to alcoholism, drug abuse and indigency...

Here's an example of what I'm talking about, from this thread: Boy Drugged By Lesbian "Parents" To Be A Girl | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The boy is probably going along with this so he can finally experience a sense of mattering in a functioning adult world.. Now THERE'S a happy, well-adjusted son of lesbians..

Lesbodruggedboy_zps6ea79551.jpg

And for context, you've plucked one frame out of a video and made up a narrative about it. When you watch the video, the kid is merely moving in her seat. You made up all of your

Again, you're just recycling the same tired bullshit over and over. The Prince Trust study doesn't say a thing that you do. It doesn't measure the effects of any kind of parenting, by your own admission. It never even mentions mothers and fathers.

You're offering us the hallucination, the same lies and debunked nonsense that didn't work the last time you spewed them. We've read the prince trust study. We know you're wrong. You've read the prince trust study. You know you're wrong. And you know we know you're wrong.

This entire thread is just a thumb sucking, self soothing exercise. Where you repeat your lies to yourself. And no one is believing you. Including you.

But we're talking about how a state would view the preponderence of evidence. And the preponderence of evidence comes down heavily on the side of children needing their same gender in a married home to grow up psychologically "mattering".. That's a very deep wound to internalize..."not mattering in a functioning adult world". That is the daily implied message to a child of the opposite gender growing up in a gay home, no matter how many sugar cookies or designer clothes the "parents" buy him or her to smooth over the wounds..

You keep using legal terms as if you know what they mean. No, the proponderance of evidence doesn't support your conclusion. The chidlren of same sex parents are healthy, as affirmed by a litany of studies.

You ignoring evidence isn't the preponderance of evidence. You don't know what the term means. And your claims have nothing to do with the law. Which is why you're always wrong and your every legal prediction has been meaningless shit.

Worse, nothing you've proposed would effect any issue you claim to be addressing. As denying marriage to same sex parents doesn't mean that their children magically have opposite sex parents. It only guarantees that these children will never have married parents. Which hurts them. By the 10s of thousands. And doesn't help a single child.

Absolutely destroying your entire argument.

And finally, no one is required to have kids in order to be married. Making your denial of marriage more pseudo-legal gibberish. As the standard you're using to deny them marriage isn't one that ANYONE is held to.

You've literally made it up. And your imagination is legally irrelevant. You can't get around that. And while you may not be able to distinguish your imagination from legal evidence, the courts can. Which is why your record of predicting the outcome of cases is perfectly wrong.

Every case. Every single time. You are always wrong.

I've had enough of this lying and hateful moron.
 
Ah, another page disappears.

For context...

Cute pictures. Now post ones with two lesbians holding a son and two gay men holding a daughter. Then we'll get busy talking about the Prince's Trust survey and all those young adults reporting that a lack of the same gender role model in their homes left them with a sense of not belonging, and suicidal &/or prone to alcoholism, drug abuse and indigency...

Here's an example of what I'm talking about, from this thread: Boy Drugged By Lesbian "Parents" To Be A Girl | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The boy is probably going along with this so he can finally experience a sense of mattering in a functioning adult world.. Now THERE'S a happy, well-adjusted son of lesbians..

Lesbodruggedboy_zps6ea79551.jpg


More gibberish. The Prince Trust study, by your own admission, doesn't measure the effects of any kind of parenting. It never even mentions mothers and fathers. Or gays. Or gay parenting...But good same sex role models. With every example offered of no good same sex rolemodel being a child of a SINGLE parent. With the Prince Trust study citing sources outside the family as being good same sex role models....You're again offering us imaginary, delusional bullshit in yet another thumb sucker thread. Where you know you're full of shit. We know you're full of shit. And you know we know you're full of shit...But you keep repeating this nonsense to yourself as a form of self soothing.

But we're talking about how a state would view the preponderence of evidence. And the preponderence of evidence comes down heavily on the side of children needing their same gender in a married home to grow up psychologically "mattering".. That's a very deep wound to internalize..."not mattering in a functioning adult world". That is the daily implied message to a child of the opposite gender growing up in a gay home, no matter how many sugar cookies or designer clothes the "parents" buy him or her to smooth over the wounds..

That little boy with dirt on the knees of his pink stretch pants looks clearly shattered with his hands clasped over his crotch, contemplating chopping off his dick to please "his daily adult world of who matters"...that's how deep that wound is..

Your lack of understanding of , and empathy for transgender children is just one more of your many deficits as a so called human being. Furthermore you shamelessly exploit the fact that the parents happen to be lesbians as though to say that this is due to their being lesbians who want a girl? Fucking stupid!


Transgender kids: Painful quest to be who they are http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/health/transgender-
kids/index.html

One of the first things Thomas Lobel told his parents was that they were wrong.

The 3-year-old had learned sign language because he had apraxia, a speech impediment that hindered his ability to talk. The toddler pointed to himself and signed, "I am a girl."

There is little consistent advice for parents, because robust data and studies about transgender children are rare. The rates of people who are transgender vary from 1 in 30,000 to 1 in 1,000, depending on various international studies.

Like Tammy, some children as young as 3, show early signs of gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder, mental health experts who work with transgender children estimate. These children are not intersex -- they do no have a physical disorder or malformation of their sexual organs. The gender issue exists in the brain, though whether it's psychological or physiological is debated by experts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top