Сould the Statue of Liberty have been a man at the beginning?

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
Some retro posters indicate that it was a man

%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D1%81%D0%BE-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B5%D0%B9-%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8B-%D0%B8-%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BC-%D0%BD%D1%8C%D1%8E-%D0%B9%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80-159411592.jpg


e052ea6698a7a7d05ba70c1fdf48e942.jpg


In general, it would be logical to assume this, because it is a copy of the Colossus of Rhodes, Helios, the sun god and the horns of the statue are the solar rays of Helios.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
The bare part of the arm - the forearm and hand are powerful and muscular, they were conceived as masculine. And the only thing that makes a statue а woman is а small tit on the right side. They could attach it later. It is not visible in the old images

596px-Presidential_dollar_coin_reverse.png
 
Liberty was usually anthropomorphized as a woman, sometimes bare breasted, leading the peasants against the french monarchy. It's based on an old roman goddess with a little Joan of Arc thrown in for good measure.
 
Is there any reason to assume that the boob was attached not at the time of creation of the statue but later?
 
And now we are at the point where the White wing INCELs want to get rid of any representations of women.
I like women with small breasts, but such a muscular body would make my friend suspicious and not rush too much.

 
There is no doubt that this "goddess" is colossus of Rhodes
The liberty goddess was an often forbidden deity for revolutionaries and populists in imperial Rome. The colossus was likely a sea god of some sort.
 
The liberty goddess was an often forbidden deity for revolutionaries and populists in imperial Rome. The colossus was likely a sea god of some sort.
This is Helios, the god of the sun, hence he has a torch and rays on his head
 
The statue was initially intended for the entrance of the Suez canal. They didn't want it. So we got stuck with it and people think it has some legal value or special meaning regards immigration.

But the meaning after it was remade as we have it was Liberty enlightening the world, not as a never-ending inducement to come to America.


 

Forum List

Back
Top