Soros and his shadow party

[Mr.Fitnah]

Heritage Foundation. Even hear of them? I'm sure you have.

Who was their biggest bankroller: Richard Mellon Scaife. Yup. The guy who drove and funded the Troopergate/blue dress / Git Clinton fiasco back when....you remember, right?

Real radical stuff here
Index of Heritage Research

 

[paperview]

To what end?

To what end?

1st, because I was asked, doofus.

2: Are you trying to somehow suggest when Right Wing Money Tanks do the bankrolling (and there are plenty) it's OK, but when a left wing Money Tank does it - only then it's a problem?

Cause that seems to be what you are inferring.

Here's a clue: BOTH sides are funded, deeply, by billionaires who do their best to influence what they can. Period.

Like this even needs to be said. Duh.

To what end does moon spend all that money?

Soros ends are distinctly Un American anti capitalist.
Can you post and remain civil?

Answer me this: Why would someone fund a newspaper that makes NOT ONE DIME? It is one of the most widely quoted conservative newspapers in the world.

He has funded that paper to the tune of BILLIONS, yes, BILLIONS.

Not ONE PENNY in profit has the Washington Times ever made.
x Now you tell me: How fucking capitalistic is that?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

To what end?

1st, because I was asked, doofus.

2: Are you trying to somehow suggest when Right Wing Money Tanks do the bankrolling (and there are plenty) it's OK, but when a left wing Money Tank does it - only then it's a problem?

Cause that seems to be what you are inferring.

Here's a clue: BOTH sides are funded, deeply, by billionaires who do their best to influence what they can. Period.

Like this even needs to be said. Duh.

To what end does moon spend all that money?

Soros ends are distinctly Un American anti capitalist.
Can you post and remain civil?

Answer me this: Why would someone fund a newspaper that makes NOT ONE DIME? It is one of the most widely quoted conservative newspapers in the world.

He has funded that paper to the tune of BILLIONS, yes, BILLIONS.

Not ONE PENNY in profit has the Washington Times ever made.
x Now you tell me: How fucking capitalistic is that?

Perhaps he believes the traditional values of western culture are worth the sacrifice.
Soros spends his money to eradicate western culture.
All the same to you I see.

 

[Contessa_Sharra]

Bloomberg.com: News

To help promote its ideas, CAP employs 11 full-time bloggers who contribute to two Web sites, ThinkProgress and the Wonk Room; others prepare daily feeds for radio stations. The center's policy briefings are standing-room only, packed with lobbyists, advocacy-group representatives and reporters looking for insights on where the Obama administration is headed.
`Premier Progressive'
``The center is the premier progressive think tank in Washington,'' said Mark Green, head of the New Democracy Project, an urban-affairs institute in New York.
Just eight days after the Nov. 4 election, CAP released a 300,000-word volume called ``Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President'' that offers advice on issues such as economic revival and fixing the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Work on the book began almost a year ago.
CAP, which has 180 staffers and a $27 million budget, devotes as much as half of its resources to promoting its ideas through blogs, events, publications and media outreach.
The center's future was far from certain in 2003, when wealthy donors such as Soros and film producer Stephen Bing gave $10 million or more to fill what they believed was an intellectual void in the Democratic Party and create a vehicle to produce an agenda for the party's eventual return to power.

So freaking what!!!!!!!!!!!1

Are you actually trying to promote that the RADICAL RIGHT doesn't spend millions on PR and agenda based BULLSHIT.....

For crissake go make some mac and cheese and be useful!

 

[PixieStix]

Bloomberg.com: News

To help promote its ideas, CAP employs 11 full-time bloggers who contribute to two Web sites, ThinkProgress and the Wonk Room; others prepare daily feeds for radio stations. The center's policy briefings are standing-room only, packed with lobbyists, advocacy-group representatives and reporters looking for insights on where the Obama administration is headed.
`Premier Progressive'
``The center is the premier progressive think tank in Washington,'' said Mark Green, head of the New Democracy Project, an urban-affairs institute in New York.
Just eight days after the Nov. 4 election, CAP released a 300,000-word volume called ``Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President'' that offers advice on issues such as economic revival and fixing the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Work on the book began almost a year ago.
CAP, which has 180 staffers and a $27 million budget, devotes as much as half of its resources to promoting its ideas through blogs, events, publications and media outreach.
The center's future was far from certain in 2003, when wealthy donors such as Soros and film producer Stephen Bing gave $10 million or more to fill what they believed was an intellectual void in the Democratic Party and create a vehicle to produce an agenda for the party's eventual return to power.

So freaking what!!!!!!!!!!!1

Are you actually trying to promote that the RADICAL RIGHT doesn't spend millions on PR and agenda based BULLSHIT.....

For crissake go make some mac and cheese and be useful!

Keep on neg repping like you do, for CHRISTS sake get a life

Getting pissy, because we are aware eh? You hate Horowitz, that is your problem

Later negger

 

[paperview]

To what end does moon spend all that money?

Soros ends are distinctly Un American anti capitalist.
Can you post and remain civil?

Answer me this: Why would someone fund a newspaper that makes NOT ONE DIME? It is one of the most widely quoted conservative newspapers in the world.

He has funded that paper to the tune of BILLIONS, yes, BILLIONS.

Not ONE PENNY in profit has the Washington Times ever made.
x Now you tell me: How fucking capitalistic is that?

Perhaps he believes the traditional values of western culture are worth the sacrifice.
Soros spends his money to eradicate western culture.
All the same to you I see.

You mean like the Traditional Values of the owner of the Wash Times - you know, that would be one where the billionaire megalomaniac LITERALLY CALLS HIMSELF THE MESSIAH.

He runs a damn cult. The MOONIES. He holds mass weddings in Football stadiums.
He tells his followers to donate all their money to him and follow him.
He uses sophisticated mind control in his 'church.'
He funds dictators, he funds the Right Wing GOP.
He owns the Propaganda device known as the Washington Times.

He Even said that Jesus 'got it WRONG' and that all will call him "Father' one day.

He even had a freaking coronation in the US Senate Office Building crowning him KING!


You mean THOSE traditional values???

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Answer me this: Why would someone fund a newspaper that makes NOT ONE DIME? It is one of the most widely quoted conservative newspapers in the world.

He has funded that paper to the tune of BILLIONS, yes, BILLIONS.

Not ONE PENNY in profit has the Washington Times ever made.
x Now you tell me: How fucking capitalistic is that?

Perhaps he believes the traditional values of western culture are worth the sacrifice.
Soros spends his money to eradicate western culture.
All the same to you I see.

You mean like the Traditional Values of the owner of the Wash Times - you know, that would be one where the billionaire megalomaniac LITERALLY CALLS HIMSELF THE MESSIAH.

He runs a damn cult. The MOONIES. He holds mass weddings in Football stadiums.
He tells his followers to donate all their money to him and follow him.
He uses sophisticated mind control in his 'church.'
He funds dictators, he funds the Right Wing GOP.
He owns the Propaganda device known as the Washington Times.

He Even said that Jesus 'got it WRONG' and that all will call him "Father' one day.

He even had a freaking coronation in the US Senate Office Building crowning him KING!


You mean THOSE traditional values???

Kind of kookey , Not really trying to destroy the country though.

 

[paperview]

<just shakes head>

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

<just shakes head>

Is that what his newpaper prints daily?

 

[Contessa_Sharra]

Soros is behind much of the networking and funding of the CAP, and other groups, out to steal our freedoms and change our nation into a thugocracy

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977

We need to be vigilent, and stay alert never give them a minute to regroup.

we can not just sit and take it

Horowitz, knows what he is talking about.Liberals need to wake up. What is stolen from conservatives is also stolen from liberals. Wake the hell up, and stop allowing the left to use you and throw you away at their convenience. Shees. Are you freedom loving Americans, or tools?

Who do you think is actually running this country, the democratic party was taken over by the left wing liberals and Soros takes primary responsibility for that.

Read Zell Millers book- A democratic party no more. John Kennedy was no liberal, nothing like his brother Ted so don't be confused. Kennedy passed one of the largest across the boards tax cuts in history, something you will never see a liberal do. He was also quite a hawk on the defense of this nation, the Cuban missile crisis. He meant business.

Zell Miller is one of the old time democratic senators in power during the Kennedy years. it was a time when you did not need to worry about the safety of your country because these guys did not play patty cake with our enemies unlike today. Soros and his liberals have hi-jacked the democratic party and have made a mockery of it.

Someday, I hope the REAL democratic party shows up again, until then I won't be holding my breath.

I did not just find this out yesterday, I have been telling people about Soros for years, but since there are so many who do not know or at least pretend they don't. I thought I would just remind them of who is actually funding and helping to network and create all these groups that help to place their puppetman in the Whitehouse.

I have read Zell Millers book and many others, I don't get all my information from the MSM, never did. I read, think, analyze, and make a decision.

Actions from both parties speak louder than words, but the democratic party does many things in the darkness, because the American people are NOT radicals, and the GOP act like they are impotent

But the shadow party does most things in a backhanded very secretive and manipulating way. And if the GOP would stop talking about the problems as if they are a management problems and start speaking and acting like it is a freedom under assault problem, and speak the language of freedom, then, maybe, just maybe we can get back some of what was allowed to be taken and turned in our nation

Shadows behind shadows.....

Equity is when you come to the discussion with clean hands. I suggest you take a trip to your own mirror.

Example of one of the RIGHT's CREEPS and LIARS doing it like a shadow party does most things: in a backhanded very secretive and manipulating way - Rick Berman - SourceWatch - Center for Consumer Freedom or Deception? You Decide.:

Biting the hand that spins you​

by

Nancy Goldstein, for RawStoryQ

“Activists drive consumer behavior on meat, alcohol, fat, sugar, tobacco and caffeine, so
our strategy is to shoot the messenger…We’ve got to attack their credibility as
spokespersons…”​

​

​

-Richard Berman from a 1999 interview with the ​

​

Chain Leader, a trade publication for restaurant

chains​

Rick Berman doesn’t give a damn about you or AIDS research. But you’d never know that from the
full-page ad his DC-based PR firm placed in the New Yorker last month (February 14th & 21st).
Readers of the magazine were treated to an image of a red AIDS ribbon set aflame beneath a
quotation attributed to Ingrid Newkirk, President and co-founder of ​

​

PETA (People for the Ethical

Treatment of Animals): “Even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we’d be against it.”​

The text below continues: “PETA’s violent opposition to medical research is well known. Not as well
recognized: PETA has funneled over $100,000 to criminals…For more about PETA and other
extremists go to ConsumerFreedom.com.”​

The ad claims PETA cares so little about people that they put the interests of animals above humans
even when the litmus test is the AIDS pandemic. By contrast, you might imagine, the Center for
Consumer Freedom supports medical research, including AIDS-related research, condemns violence,
and shirks from criminality.​

You could imagine that. But you would be wrong.​

Because the Center for Consumer Freedom is not, as it describes itself in the small print at the
bottom of the ad, “a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting consumer choices.” It’s a front
group that represents the interests of the restaurant, alcohol, and tobacco industries. It started out
as the “Guest Choice Network” with $900K in seed money from Philip Morris, which ​

​

kicked in an

additional $2.1 million dollars ​

​

over the next two years.

Like PETA, it’s a tax-exempt activist group — but on the other side of the political fence. Unlike
PETA, however, its founder runs a lobbying firm that specializes in corporate special interest
initiatives. Other Berman projects housed at the Center for Consumer Freedom’s address include
the so-called Employment Policies Institute, which fights to keep the minimum wage low and
opposes mandatory health insurance for workers, and the American Beverage Institute, which
helped kill federal legislation supported by advocacy groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving
(MADD) that would have lowered legal blood-alcohol levels for drivers.​

And the only other time that Rick Berman appears to have concerned himself with AIDS was in a
​

​

1989 commentary ​

​

for Nation’s Restaurant News where he opposed the passage of the Americans

with Disabilities Act (ADA) because it “would require employers to ignore AIDS infections among
cooks and servers unless a direct threat to the safety of others can be proved.” Not, mind you,
because he actually believed that HIV or AIDS could be contracted through casual contact, but
because “the average person is still overly concerned” about that possibility.​

How can you openly value the corporate bottom line over the rights of people living with AIDS and
then run an ad that attempts to profit off the backs of those people? Easy. Hypocrisy — and
absolutely no sense of irony about one’s own double standards. After all, these are the same folks
who sent picketers to Ingrid Newkirk’s book signing in DC last month to chant about the need for
full disclosure — while wearing masks.​

And despite the hefty financial backing that Berman and his cadre enjoy from special interest
groups, don’t expect them to show up on ActivistCash.com — an offshoot of the Center for
Consumer Freedom — any time soon. The site’s stated mission is to provide “the public and media
with in-depth profiles of anti-consumer activist groups, along with information about the sources of
their exorbitant funding.”​

But these same folks who never tire of talking about unmasking “financial Goliaths” and “deeppocketed
foundations” would never dream of holding themselves to the same standards they
demand of their “activist” enemies. The Center for Consumer Freedom’s ​

​

tax form (PDF) lists over

$3.25 million in “direct public support” for 2003’s “educational efforts” but declines to name a single
individual or corporate donor. (PR Watch helpfully posts a ​

​

memo from an internal whistleblower that

names dozens of Berman’s backers ​

​

, including Coca Cola, Tyson Foods, Outback Steakhouse,

Wendy’s, and Monsanto.​

Still, the question of who profits from the Center for Consumer Freedom is far easier to answer than
the question of who funds it. Its top expenditure in 2003 was the $1.5 million dollars in consulting
fees and employee benefits it paid to Rick Berman’s firm, which it describes as its “management
company.”​

You heard right. Rick Berman has set up a PR machine on behalf of the restaurant, tobacco, and
alcohol industry that presents itself as a consumer protection group, tries to discredit any kind of
investigation or legislation that might cut into industry profits, yells and screams about the allegedly
shady funding behind “activist” groups, enjoys tax-exempt status as a non-profit organization, and
pays its largest yearly fees into Rick Berman’s pockets.​

Not that Berman isn’t worth it. In addition to shifting public debate from corporate responsibility to
consumer liability, he successfully plants his op-eds and talking points everywhere, from USA
Today, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
to the ever helpful Wall Street Journal and Washington Times. (Berman did not, however, respond
to numerous requests to speak on record for this article.)​

Even now, when the media is full of stories about the government’s planting of PR as news,
publications accept Berman’s ads and articles without blinking. Why is anyone’s guess. The pressure
on print media to accept all advertising at a time of shrinking revenue? The need for free content?
Political bias? (I was certainly left guessing by the New Yorker, which did not respond to repeated
requests to comment on their ad vetting process, but helpfully faxed me a 2005 rates list that
revealed the $88,845 price tag on the Center for Consumer Freedom’s four-color full-page ad.)
“It’s a reflection of how careless the news media has become that newspapers will run op-eds from
Berman that present him as a consumer advocate instead of a corporate mouthpiece,” says Sheldon
Rampton, Research Director of PR Watch. “The op-ed pages are full of people like Berman. That’s
part of what the public relations industry does.”​

You have to hand it to those right-wing PR hacks: they sure do know how to get the most out of all
sides of a symbol. Berman’s PR firm used the imagery of an AIDS ribbon to arouse left-wing public
ire against PETA in mid February. The very next week, USA Next, a 527 front group, used the image
of two guys kissing to arouse right-wing public ire against the AARP.​

But there are signs that we’re learning to fight fire with fire.​

One delicious unintended result of the USA Next ad: the couple in the photo have just ​

​

filed a $25

million lawsuit ​

​

against them and political consulting firm Mark Montini International “for using their

wedding photo without permission in a high-profile gay-bashing ad designed to drum up support for
social security privatization.”​

And even Berman’s luck may be about to run out. This past November, ​

​

Citizens for Responsibility

and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint ​

​

with the Internal Revenue Service alleging that

the Center for Consumer Freedom has violated its tax exempt status and engaged in activities with
no charitable purpose.​

“We were the first organization to go after Berman,” said Melanie Sloan, CREW’s executive director.
“The IRS [has] begun taking a closer looks at nonprofits that may be abusing their 501©(3) status
in the past year or so. I think they’re going to take one look at what Rick Berman has been doing
and shut him down.”​

​

​

Note to self: ​

​

check back with USA Next, Mark Montini International, and Rick Berman in six months

to see if they still believe that all publicity is good publicity.​

​

​

Nancy Goldstein ​

​

earned her doctorate from Brandeis University, and has taught at Harvard, MIT,​

and Connecticut College. She is the co-editor of “The Gender Politics of HIV/AIDS in Women” (NYU
Press, 1997),which includes her article on the invisibility of women who have sex with women in the
pandemic. Last May she and her partner were one of 36 out-of-state couples to wed in
Massachussetts prior to the governor’s cease and desist order. She lives and writes in New York.​

Nancy’s column appears every Thursday on RawStoryQ

​

 

[Contessa_Sharra]

Someday, I hope the REAL democratic party shows up again, until then I won't be holding my breath.

Go to the RNC, you will find the former KKK oriented Dixiecrats there!

 

[Contessa_Sharra]

I did not just find this out yesterday, I have been telling people about Soros for years,....

Were you equally concerned about Richard Mellon Scaife, Joseph Coors, the Hunt brothers, the Olin, Bradley, and Koch family foundations...the Washington Times cult-head Sun Myung Moon and that other lovable megalomaniacal Australian billionaire Rupert Murdock?

Something tells me you weren't.

Are they throwing their wealth behind social justice programs?

I think they were/are the ones behind SOCIAL INJUSTICE!!!!!!!

 

[bodecea]

You know Tommy is in meltdown mode when he starts barking orders.

And sending stark raving mad e-mails.

Really?

Yeppers.

 

[RodISHI]

needlessly inconvenienced electrons excluded
I am busy in the office today, but I will add more to this as I can...

To what end?

George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $7.2 billion. His management company controls billions more in investor assets. Since 1979, his foundation network -- whose flagship is the Open Society Institute (OSI) -- has dispensed an estimated $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. (The President of OSI and the Soros Foundation Network is Aryeh Neier, former Director of the socialist League for Industrial Democracy.) With assets of $859 million as of 2005, OSI alone donates scores of millions of dollars annually to these various groups, whose major agendas can be summarized as follows:
promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation
promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act

depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral
promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
defending suspected anti-American terrorists and their abetters
financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
advocating America’s unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending
opposing the death penalty in all circumstances
promoting socialized medicine in the United States
promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is “not clean air and clean water, [but] rather ... the demolition of technological/industrial civilization”
bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations
promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike

To view a list of many of the more important organizations that support these agendas and have received direct funding from Soros and his Open Society Institute in recent years, click here. (Comprehensive profiles of each are available in the "Groups" category of DiscoverTheNetworks.org.)

There are also numerous “secondary” or “indirect” affiliates of the Soros network. These include organizations which do not receive direct funding from Soros and OSI, but which are funded by one or more organizations that do. These secondary affiliates also include organizations that work collaboratively or synergistically with Soros-funded groups. To view a list of some of these organizations, click here. (Comprehensive profiles of each are available in the "Groups" category of DiscoverTheNetworks.org.)

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589

I was reading through a list of his organizations buy-ins or the sell-outs list of where he bought in not long ago. Some of the names were very interesting. That kind of money with an agenda on your hands you can buy-off and pay-off many organizations and people.

All the more reason to say enough for bullshit tax free organizations determining who the people will elect into the positions of the government leadership.

If the people pay taxes so should the king. That means everyone. If these propped up organizations have a right to try and direct how people will vote and get be tax exempt, so do the churches and every other organization that calls themselves charity.

If they call themselves a charitable organization of any kind make them open up their books for public inspection. If they are unwilling to do so then let them all pay taxes like regular folk. Have that information available to the public so the public can determine if they wish to still support these organizations.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Seems some cant tell the difference between anti your political party and anti American.

If a populace expects to be uneducated and free, it expects what never was and never will be. - Thomas Jefferson

 

[Polk]

I'm trying to figure out how the Open Society Institute, a group founded in 1980s to funnel money to anti-communist groups in the Soviet bloc, is someone secretly supportive of communism.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

In his 1998 book The Crisis of Global Capitalism, Soros predicted an imminent collapse of the global financial system. Financiers like himself were largely to blame, he wrote, for they had allowed greed to overwhelm their humanity. &#8220;The (global capitalist) system is deeply flawed,&#8221; wrote Soros. &#8220;As long as capitalism remains triumphant, the pursuit of money overrides all other social considerations.&#8221; [6]

Soros offered no coherent solution to the problem. He simply continued his long-established pattern of pouring money into a hodge-podge of fashionable leftwing causes, such as promoting mass immigration into the United States; financing anti-gun lawsuits and lobbyists; demanding voting rights for felons; seeking the abolition of capital punishment; exacerbating Palestinian unrest; promoting abortion; feminism; population control; gay liberation; euthanasia; radical theories of education; marijuana legalization and global government.

FrontPage Magazine - The Shadow Party: Part I

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Passed on March 27, 2002, the McCain-Feingold Act forbade political parties from collecting soft money. To take some of the sting out of the soft-money prohibition, it raised the limit on individual hard-money contributions from $1,000 per candidate each year to $2,000.

However, McCain-Feingold failed to address the issue of Section 527 "stealth PACs." It did not explicitly forbid private 527s from raising soft money for electioneering purposes. This left political operatives in a quandary. Could they or couldn't they continue to raise soft money through private 527 non-profit groups? No one was sure. But the Democrats took the lead in forging ahead, despite the legal risks. Democrats reasoned that as long as the operators of 527 groups refrained from coordinating their activities directly with the candidates or political parties, and refrained from uttering the "magic words," they could raise as much money as they wanted through 527s.

Republicans disagreed. They charged that the Shadow Party was a criminal enterprise, whose activities were akin to money laundering. However, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) declined to rule on the matter until after the 2004 election. The Republicans were left with no choice but to try to play catch-up. Republicans began building their own 527 network. But the Democrats had the jump on them. It was the Democrats - and George Soros in particular - who had been pushing McCain-Feingold for years. They knew its loopholes and weaknesses intimately, and were ready to exploit them the moment the law was passed.

 

[PixieStix]

Passed on March 27, 2002, the McCain-Feingold Act forbade political parties from collecting soft money. To take some of the sting out of the soft-money prohibition, it raised the limit on individual hard-money contributions from $1,000 per candidate each year to $2,000.

However, McCain-Feingold failed to address the issue of Section 527 "stealth PACs." It did not explicitly forbid private 527s from raising soft money for electioneering purposes. This left political operatives in a quandary. Could they or couldn't they continue to raise soft money through private 527 non-profit groups? No one was sure. But the Democrats took the lead in forging ahead, despite the legal risks. Democrats reasoned that as long as the operators of 527 groups refrained from coordinating their activities directly with the candidates or political parties, and refrained from uttering the "magic words," they could raise as much money as they wanted through 527s.

Republicans disagreed. They charged that the Shadow Party was a criminal enterprise, whose activities were akin to money laundering. However, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) declined to rule on the matter until after the 2004 election. The Republicans were left with no choice but to try to play catch-up. Republicans began building their own 527 network. But the Democrats had the jump on them. It was the Democrats - and George Soros in particular - who had been pushing McCain-Feingold for years. They knew its loopholes and weaknesses intimately, and were ready to exploit them the moment the law was passed.

Thank you Mr. Fitnah, this is what I have been telling people for some time now. I have never totally forgiven McCain in his role in this scam against the American people. All in the name of bipartisanship? No, McCain seemed to be bitter because he was not good at raising campaign money

I have always said that McCain Feingold created moveon.org, and made Micheal Moore even fatter....in his head and wallet. And soros is laughing all along

Money laundering indeed!!

Beginning of deep deep in your face corruption in DC

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

We can continue with bitter petty bickering and lose the promise of this founding fathers or we can learn and fight back against those who benefit from keeping us fighting each other over parties..

We the People of the United States,
in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure
domestic Tranquility, provide for
the common defense, promote the
general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the
United States of America.​