So you love socialism ?????

[Wyatt earp]

Yes...we love the United States unique brand of socialism. We like collectively paying for infrastructure and safety (you know, like our police, firefighters and military). We would ALSO like to expand that unique brand of socialism to things like healthcare and education. We get the best "free" military in the world, why not the best "free" education and healthcare?

False premise. 1st you tell us how much we are already paying for education compared to everyone else, and since it is run by the teachers union which is basically SOCIALIST, explain why more SOCIALISM will improve it.

Maybe for one second the problem with education is not socialism... Look at the best education systems in the world they are all social programs... The countries with the best educated people in the world have the best government educations systems...

As to your comment on Teachers Unions...

Keys To Finnish Educational Success: Intensive Teacher-Training, Union Collaboration
The Hechinger Report: What roles do teacher unions play in Finland? In the U.S. right now, unions are seen as a big problem standing in the way of reform. What's it like in Finland?

Virkkunen: It's a totally different situation in Finland. For me, as Minister of Education, our teachers' union has been one of the main partners because we have the same goal: we all want to ensure that the quality of education is good and we are working very much together with the union. Nearly every week we are in discussions with them. They are very powerful in Finland. Nearly all of the teachers are members. I think we don't have big differences in our thinking. They are very good partners for us.

List of countries by student performance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another retard that thinks European Unions are the same as American ones...


Ok I can play that game.

The Sweden Democrats - Sverigedemokraterna - Radio Sweden




The Sweden Democrats is pushing for a ninety percent reduction in immigration, but they also want to improve working conditions in health care and lower taxes for senior citizens. The party also demands that those who come to Sweden adapt to Swedish culture and values - especially those coming from Muslim countries. Party leader Jimmie Åkesson recently said that Islamism is the Nazism of our time.

 

[Rustic]

No two ways about it the federal government is a banana republic

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Bripiss, do tell, what is the immoral selfish infant solution (since it's not in the Constitution) to the FAA? This?

Private companies can control air traffic.

Really? Show us how that would work? Why would I, as Airline Selfish Infant, pay into something that allowed Airline Cheap Flights to compete against me? My planes, my airport, my flights, the sky would be unregulated. I wouldn't pay a dime, no good capitalist would.

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

 

[Rustic]

Bripiss, do tell, what is the immoral selfish infant solution (since it's not in the Constitution) to the FAA? This?

Private companies can control air traffic.

Really? Show us how that would work? Why would I, as Airline Selfish Infant, pay into something that allowed Airline Cheap Flights to compete against me? My planes, my airport, my flights, the sky would be unregulated. I wouldn't pay a dime, no good capitalist would.

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

You have too much government worship going on...
Lol

 

[bripat9643]

Bripiss, do tell, what is the immoral selfish infant solution (since it's not in the Constitution) to the FAA? This?

Private companies can control air traffic.

Really? Show us how that would work? Why would I, as Airline Selfish Infant, pay into something that allowed Airline Cheap Flights to compete against me? My planes, my airport, my flights, the sky would be unregulated. I wouldn't pay a dime, no good capitalist would.

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

You're an idiot. Few airlines want to own an airport anymore than trucking companies would want to own a highway. Airlines that have lots of crashes don't tend to be popular with consumers, so every airline would find it in its self-interest to subscribe to an air traffic control service. An airline has to fly to every city in the country, and it would be cost prohibitive for it to own an airport in every location where it had to fly.

You really are a special kind of idiot.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

Phuleeze. Courts have never enforced such contracts. When you buy a lift ticket at a ski resort it says the resort is not responsible for any injuries you may incur. However, people sue ski resorts all the time for their injuries and win.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You have too much government worship going on...
Lol

I don't worship it, it's a necessary evil.

Here's an example for ya, of the government doing what only the government can:

"Origins of the FAA
Aviation industry leaders believed the airplane could not reach its full commercial potential without federal action to improve and maintain safety standards. At their urging, the Air Commerce Act was passed in 1926. This landmark legislation charged the Secretary of Commerce with fostering air commerce, issuing and enforcing air traffic rules, licensing pilots, certifying aircraft, establishing airways, and operating and maintaining aids to air navigation. A new Aeronautics Branch in the Department of Commerce assumed primary responsibility for aviation oversight, and William P. MacCracken, Jr., became its first director."
History


A Brief History of the FAA
The modern age of powered flight began in 1903 when Orville Wright made the first sustained, powered flight on December 17 in a plane he and his brother Wilbur built. This twelve-second flight led to the development of the first practical airplane in 1905 and launched worldwide efforts to build better flying machines. As a result, the early 20th century witnessed myriad aviation developments as new planes and technologies entered service. During World War I, the airplane also proved its effectiveness as a military tool and, with the advent of early airmail service, showed great promise for commercial applications.

Despite limited post-World War I technical developments, early aviation remained a dangerous business. Flying conditions proved difficult since the only navigation devices available to most pilots were magnetic compasses. Pilots flew 200 to 500 feet above ground so they could navigate by roads and railways. Low visibility and night landings were made using bonfires on the field as lighting. Fatal accidents were routine.

The Air Mail Act of 1925 facilitated the creation of a profitable commercial airline industry, and airline companies such as Pan American Airways, Western Air Express, and Ford Air Transport Service began scheduled commercial passenger service. By the mid-1930s, the four major domestic airlines that dominated commercial travel for most of the 20th century began operations: United, American, Eastern, and Transcontinental and Western Air (TWA).

As air travel increased, some airport operators, hoping to improve safety, began providing an early form of air traffic control (ATC) based on visual signals. Early controllers stood on the field and waved flags to communicate with pilots. Archie League, the system's first flagmen, began work in the late 1920s at the airfield in St. Louis, Missouri."

Whoever told you that government is always a bad thing, lied to you, and doesn't understand capitalism at all: Government is Good - Capitalism Requires Government

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Bripiss, do tell, what is the immoral selfish infant solution (since it's not in the Constitution) to the FAA? This?

Private companies can control air traffic.

Really? Show us how that would work? Why would I, as Airline Selfish Infant, pay into something that allowed Airline Cheap Flights to compete against me? My planes, my airport, my flights, the sky would be unregulated. I wouldn't pay a dime, no good capitalist would.

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

You're an idiot. Few airlines want to own an airport anymore than trucking companies would want to own a highway. Airlines that have lots of crashes don't tend to be popular with consumers, so every airline would find it in its self-interest to subscribe to an air traffic control service. An airline has to fly to every city in the country, and it would be cost prohibitive for it to own an airport in every location where it had to fly.

You really are a special kind of idiot.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

Phuleeze. Courts have never enforced such contracts. When you buy a lift ticket at a ski resort it says the resort is not responsible for any injuries you may incur. However, people sue ski resorts all the time for their injuries and win.

See just above, and say goodbye to your wet-dreams...

And I'd be more than happy to own the only good roads around, and I'd charge through the nose for people using them

 

[bripat9643]

You have too much government worship going on...
Lol

I don't worship it, it's a necessary evil.

Here's an example for ya, of the government doing what only the government can:

"Origins of the FAA
Aviation industry leaders believed the airplane could not reach its full commercial potential without federal action to improve and maintain safety standards. At their urging, the Air Commerce Act was passed in 1926. This landmark legislation charged the Secretary of Commerce with fostering air commerce, issuing and enforcing air traffic rules, licensing pilots, certifying aircraft, establishing airways, and operating and maintaining aids to air navigation. A new Aeronautics Branch in the Department of Commerce assumed primary responsibility for aviation oversight, and William P. MacCracken, Jr., became its first director."
History


A Brief History of the FAA
The modern age of powered flight began in 1903 when Orville Wright made the first sustained, powered flight on December 17 in a plane he and his brother Wilbur built. This twelve-second flight led to the development of the first practical airplane in 1905 and launched worldwide efforts to build better flying machines. As a result, the early 20th century witnessed myriad aviation developments as new planes and technologies entered service. During World War I, the airplane also proved its effectiveness as a military tool and, with the advent of early airmail service, showed great promise for commercial applications.

Despite limited post-World War I technical developments, early aviation remained a dangerous business. Flying conditions proved difficult since the only navigation devices available to most pilots were magnetic compasses. Pilots flew 200 to 500 feet above ground so they could navigate by roads and railways. Low visibility and night landings were made using bonfires on the field as lighting. Fatal accidents were routine.

The Air Mail Act of 1925 facilitated the creation of a profitable commercial airline industry, and airline companies such as Pan American Airways, Western Air Express, and Ford Air Transport Service began scheduled commercial passenger service. By the mid-1930s, the four major domestic airlines that dominated commercial travel for most of the 20th century began operations: United, American, Eastern, and Transcontinental and Western Air (TWA).

As air travel increased, some airport operators, hoping to improve safety, began providing an early form of air traffic control (ATC) based on visual signals. Early controllers stood on the field and waved flags to communicate with pilots. Archie League, the system's first flagmen, began work in the late 1920s at the airfield in St. Louis, Missouri."

Whoever told you that government is always a bad thing, lied to you, and doesn't understand capitalism at all: Government is Good - Capitalism Requires Government

Government propaganda.

 

[bripat9643]

Private companies can control air traffic.

Really? Show us how that would work? Why would I, as Airline Selfish Infant, pay into something that allowed Airline Cheap Flights to compete against me? My planes, my airport, my flights, the sky would be unregulated. I wouldn't pay a dime, no good capitalist would.

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

You're an idiot. Few airlines want to own an airport anymore than trucking companies would want to own a highway. Airlines that have lots of crashes don't tend to be popular with consumers, so every airline would find it in its self-interest to subscribe to an air traffic control service. An airline has to fly to every city in the country, and it would be cost prohibitive for it to own an airport in every location where it had to fly.

You really are a special kind of idiot.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

Phuleeze. Courts have never enforced such contracts. When you buy a lift ticket at a ski resort it says the resort is not responsible for any injuries you may incur. However, people sue ski resorts all the time for their injuries and win.

See just above, and say goodbye to your wet-dreams...

You propaganda is obvious horseshit.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You have too much government worship going on...
Lol

I don't worship it, it's a necessary evil.

Here's an example for ya, of the government doing what only the government can:

"Origins of the FAA
Aviation industry leaders believed the airplane could not reach its full commercial potential without federal action to improve and maintain safety standards. At their urging, the Air Commerce Act was passed in 1926. This landmark legislation charged the Secretary of Commerce with fostering air commerce, issuing and enforcing air traffic rules, licensing pilots, certifying aircraft, establishing airways, and operating and maintaining aids to air navigation. A new Aeronautics Branch in the Department of Commerce assumed primary responsibility for aviation oversight, and William P. MacCracken, Jr., became its first director."
History


A Brief History of the FAA
The modern age of powered flight began in 1903 when Orville Wright made the first sustained, powered flight on December 17 in a plane he and his brother Wilbur built. This twelve-second flight led to the development of the first practical airplane in 1905 and launched worldwide efforts to build better flying machines. As a result, the early 20th century witnessed myriad aviation developments as new planes and technologies entered service. During World War I, the airplane also proved its effectiveness as a military tool and, with the advent of early airmail service, showed great promise for commercial applications.

Despite limited post-World War I technical developments, early aviation remained a dangerous business. Flying conditions proved difficult since the only navigation devices available to most pilots were magnetic compasses. Pilots flew 200 to 500 feet above ground so they could navigate by roads and railways. Low visibility and night landings were made using bonfires on the field as lighting. Fatal accidents were routine.

The Air Mail Act of 1925 facilitated the creation of a profitable commercial airline industry, and airline companies such as Pan American Airways, Western Air Express, and Ford Air Transport Service began scheduled commercial passenger service. By the mid-1930s, the four major domestic airlines that dominated commercial travel for most of the 20th century began operations: United, American, Eastern, and Transcontinental and Western Air (TWA).

As air travel increased, some airport operators, hoping to improve safety, began providing an early form of air traffic control (ATC) based on visual signals. Early controllers stood on the field and waved flags to communicate with pilots. Archie League, the system's first flagmen, began work in the late 1920s at the airfield in St. Louis, Missouri."

Whoever told you that government is always a bad thing, lied to you, and doesn't understand capitalism at all: Government is Good - Capitalism Requires Government

Government propaganda.

Nope. It's capitalism, baby, learn it. Some industries want regulation, that's how they keep competition in check.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Really? Show us how that would work? Why would I, as Airline Selfish Infant, pay into something that allowed Airline Cheap Flights to compete against me? My planes, my airport, my flights, the sky would be unregulated. I wouldn't pay a dime, no good capitalist would.

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

You're an idiot. Few airlines want to own an airport anymore than trucking companies would want to own a highway. Airlines that have lots of crashes don't tend to be popular with consumers, so every airline would find it in its self-interest to subscribe to an air traffic control service. An airline has to fly to every city in the country, and it would be cost prohibitive for it to own an airport in every location where it had to fly.

You really are a special kind of idiot.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

Phuleeze. Courts have never enforced such contracts. When you buy a lift ticket at a ski resort it says the resort is not responsible for any injuries you may incur. However, people sue ski resorts all the time for their injuries and win.

See just above, and say goodbye to your wet-dreams...

You propaganda is obvious horseshit.

It's nothing like propaganda. We have Rustic for that.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I love public services that pay tax dollars for. Only a savage wouldn't.

 

[bripat9643]

You have too much government worship going on...
Lol

I don't worship it, it's a necessary evil.

Here's an example for ya, of the government doing what only the government can:

"Origins of the FAA
Aviation industry leaders believed the airplane could not reach its full commercial potential without federal action to improve and maintain safety standards. At their urging, the Air Commerce Act was passed in 1926. This landmark legislation charged the Secretary of Commerce with fostering air commerce, issuing and enforcing air traffic rules, licensing pilots, certifying aircraft, establishing airways, and operating and maintaining aids to air navigation. A new Aeronautics Branch in the Department of Commerce assumed primary responsibility for aviation oversight, and William P. MacCracken, Jr., became its first director."
History


A Brief History of the FAA
The modern age of powered flight began in 1903 when Orville Wright made the first sustained, powered flight on December 17 in a plane he and his brother Wilbur built. This twelve-second flight led to the development of the first practical airplane in 1905 and launched worldwide efforts to build better flying machines. As a result, the early 20th century witnessed myriad aviation developments as new planes and technologies entered service. During World War I, the airplane also proved its effectiveness as a military tool and, with the advent of early airmail service, showed great promise for commercial applications.

Despite limited post-World War I technical developments, early aviation remained a dangerous business. Flying conditions proved difficult since the only navigation devices available to most pilots were magnetic compasses. Pilots flew 200 to 500 feet above ground so they could navigate by roads and railways. Low visibility and night landings were made using bonfires on the field as lighting. Fatal accidents were routine.

The Air Mail Act of 1925 facilitated the creation of a profitable commercial airline industry, and airline companies such as Pan American Airways, Western Air Express, and Ford Air Transport Service began scheduled commercial passenger service. By the mid-1930s, the four major domestic airlines that dominated commercial travel for most of the 20th century began operations: United, American, Eastern, and Transcontinental and Western Air (TWA).

As air travel increased, some airport operators, hoping to improve safety, began providing an early form of air traffic control (ATC) based on visual signals. Early controllers stood on the field and waved flags to communicate with pilots. Archie League, the system's first flagmen, began work in the late 1920s at the airfield in St. Louis, Missouri."

Whoever told you that government is always a bad thing, lied to you, and doesn't understand capitalism at all: Government is Good - Capitalism Requires Government

Government propaganda.

Nope. It's capitalism, baby, learn it. Some industries want regulation, that's how they keep competition in check.

Nope. It's crony capitalism, which is just a form of socialism. Do you really think keeping competition in check is something desirable? If you do, you're an idiot.

 

[nat4900]

In other words, Interpretation is a means to define the constitution to mean whatever you want it to mean.

Indeed, something like, "a well regulated Militia...." gets interpreted to allow every American to walk around with an assault weapon....

 

[bripat9643]

You would pay into it because crashes are not good for business. One has to be a complete fool not to understand that. Furthermore, who say sit would be your airport?

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

You're an idiot. Few airlines want to own an airport anymore than trucking companies would want to own a highway. Airlines that have lots of crashes don't tend to be popular with consumers, so every airline would find it in its self-interest to subscribe to an air traffic control service. An airline has to fly to every city in the country, and it would be cost prohibitive for it to own an airport in every location where it had to fly.

You really are a special kind of idiot.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

Phuleeze. Courts have never enforced such contracts. When you buy a lift ticket at a ski resort it says the resort is not responsible for any injuries you may incur. However, people sue ski resorts all the time for their injuries and win.

See just above, and say goodbye to your wet-dreams...

You propaganda is obvious horseshit.

It's nothing like propaganda. We have Rustic for that.

It's a blog from a government subsidize leftwing professor - propaganda, in other word.

 

[bripat9643]

In other words, Interpretation is a means to define the constitution to mean whatever you want it to mean.

Indeed, something like, "a well regulated Militia...." gets interpreted to allow every American to walk around with an assault weapon....

No, the "shall not be infringed" part is what "allows every American to walk around with an assault weapon." The militia dependent clause is purely explanatory. It has no legal implications.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nope. It's crony capitalism, which is just a form of socialism. Do you really think keeping competition in check is something desirable?

That depends. Competition in the telephone made for major problems so, a monopoly was created and regulated. No such thing is required for socks and underwear. As usual, there is no absolute, you just (childishly) want one to exist.

 

[bripat9643]

I love public services that pay tax dollars for. Only a savage wouldn't.

You pay 4 times more for "public services" than you would if they were private.

 

[bripat9643]

Nope. It's crony capitalism, which is just a form of socialism. Do you really think keeping competition in check is something desirable?

That depends. Competition in the telephone made for major problems so, a monopoly was created and regulated. No such thing is required for socks and underwear. As usual, there is no absolute, you just (childishly) want one to exist.

More bullshit propaganda. What problems did competition in the telephone industry cause? I think the only problem it caused was a decline in Bell Telephone Corp profits.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It would be my airport just like it would be my planes and my right to fly however, wherever, and whenever I damn well wanted to. Since no company would have any control, I sure as hell wouldn't be paying some third-party for what I could do myself, control my planes.

You're an idiot. Few airlines want to own an airport anymore than trucking companies would want to own a highway. Airlines that have lots of crashes don't tend to be popular with consumers, so every airline would find it in its self-interest to subscribe to an air traffic control service. An airline has to fly to every city in the country, and it would be cost prohibitive for it to own an airport in every location where it had to fly.

You really are a special kind of idiot.

As for the customers and employees, if your worked for the airline or flew on the planes you and your family would have absolutely no right to sue for any mishap, for any reason. You don't sign the contract, move on down the road but that would be the same at the next airport, for the next airline.

Phuleeze. Courts have never enforced such contracts. When you buy a lift ticket at a ski resort it says the resort is not responsible for any injuries you may incur. However, people sue ski resorts all the time for their injuries and win.

See just above, and say goodbye to your wet-dreams...

You propaganda is obvious horseshit.

It's nothing like propaganda. We have Rustic for that.

It's a blog from a government subsidize leftwing professor - propaganda, in other word.

No one who understands capitalism thinks the government has no role. It doesn't matter a damn the source, the point is the same.

"Adam Smith is most famous for his advocacy of free markets. What’s less known is that Smith saw an important role for government in society, albeit he thought that government should be limited. In his most famous work, The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith explains that there are three legitimate functions which should be performed by the government:

"The first duty of the sovereign, that of protecting the society from the violence and invasion of other independent societies, can be performed only by means of a military force. But the expense both of preparing this military force in time of peace, and of employing it in time of war, is very different in the different states of society, in the different periods of improvement." (WN, book V, chap. 1, part 1).

This one is straight forward and save for a bunch of cranky anarchists, most people agree with it.

"The second duty of the sovereign, that of protecting, as far as possible, every member of the society from the injustice or oppression of every other member of it, or the duty of establishing an exact administration of justice, requires two very different degrees of expense in the different periods of society." (WN, book V, chap. 1, part 2).

This one is also almost universally accepted.

"The third and last duty of the sovereign or commonwealth, is that of erecting and maintaining those public institutions and those public works, which though they may be in the highest degree advantageous to a great society, are, however, of such a nature, that the profit could never repay the expense to any individual, or small number of individuals; and which it, therefore, cannot be expected that any individual, or small number of individuals, should erect or maintain. The performance of this duty requires, too, very different degrees of expense in the different periods of society." (WN, book V, chap. 1, part 3).
Adam Smith on the functions of government