cbirch2
Active Member
- Jul 9, 2011
- 1,394
- 49
- 36
- Thread starter
- #81
Well the fact that you don't equate socialism with economic collapse explains that you are a government supremacist who will grant bureaucrats absolute powers over your life.
Typically you people are parasitic , lack self motivation and suffer of severe low self-esteem.
.
The simple fact that you would equate the two is ridiculous. Some things simply should not be run for profit. Before email USPS was a very efficient way of communicating. Its a federally mandated agency that breaks even. Thats socialism.
Explain to me again how having the government run something like your electricity is so horrible. It would seem to me the fact that a government agency only has to break even would offer cheaper energy.
Firstly, the Constitution authorizes , but does not mandate, that fedgov operate a post office.
The ONLY system which encourages efficiency and decreases cost is Capitalism [free enterprise]
In a Capitalistic system you are free to operate a non-profit enterprise if you so choose; however you can not compel me to subsidize it nor to buy from you;
Competititon allows me to buy the best for the least;
In a capitalistic system my rights are UNALIENABLE not subject to bureaucratic discretion or majority rule.
.
Your such an idiot.
1. The constitution is not a list of everything good. Just because its not in the constitution doesnt mean its not potentially a good idea. Now please take this out of context....
2. The statement that the only system that decreases cost and encourages efficiency is capitalism is totally an opinion.
3. Socialism is not communism. Socialism exists within a free market economy. It is the governments participation in that free market economy. If it can be done in fundamental ways without interfering theres no problem. How can you argue against government providing basic utilities like water in order to lower costs by just breaking even, not posting profit? How is that not sound economics?
4. How does socialism restrict your rights? I guess if you mean the right to buy more expensive water from a private company than sure....
5. A captalistic (not a word) system has nothing to do with rights. Buy a dictionary.