So, is the left denouncing Obama's "unlawful" war in Libya?

Sadam was not bombing his people to death for marching for democracy.


If you are really going to pretend these things are teh same than you are so dishonest you cant be reasoned with.
 
Sadam was not bombing his people to death for marching for democracy.


If you are really going to pretend these things are teh same than you are so dishonest you cant be reasoned with.

oh, so we gotta throw military action at an oppressed people as long as they are "marching for democracy" and then it is ok. Got it. Can you cite this in the Constitution or law? No? Didn't think so. Keep making shit up, it's amusing.
 
Sadam was not bombing his people to death for marching for democracy.


If you are really going to pretend these things are teh same than you are so dishonest you cant be reasoned with.

True---he just gassed the shit out of them because they didn't agree with him.

Talking points TM---run and get some new ones.
 
letting a dictator kill his people at his insane whim is not going to be good for anyone in the world.

If gadafi is allowed to bomb his own people until only his cronies are left what do you think that says to the rest of the countries on the brink of revolution for democracy?

You people just hate anything this president does no matter what it is.

This is a un action and not a declared war.

so allowing saddam hussein to murder his own people was fine with you in 2003. His continued violations of the cease fire and violation of un edicts was fine with you in 2003.

The only difference is a republican was president then and a democrat is the president now.

exactly
 
Ron Paul of Texas, James A. Leach of Iowa, John N. Hostettler of Indiana, Constance A. Morella of Maryland, Amo Houghton of New York, and John J. Duncan of Tennessee.

six people folks.

Now will you admitt you were pro Iraq war at the time?
 
Ron Paul of Texas, James A. Leach of Iowa, John N. Hostettler of Indiana, Constance A. Morella of Maryland, Amo Houghton of New York, and John J. Duncan of Tennessee.

six people folks.

Now will you admitt you were pro Iraq war at the time?

So not "all" then, was it?
 
Sadam was not bombing his people to death for marching for democracy.


If you are really going to pretend these things are teh same than you are so dishonest you cant be reasoned with.


I suggest you research sadam a bit. Bombs are not the only way to kill your people.
 
Ron Paul of Texas, James A. Leach of Iowa, John N. Hostettler of Indiana, Constance A. Morella of Maryland, Amo Houghton of New York, and John J. Duncan of Tennessee.

six people folks.

Now will you admitt you were pro Iraq war at the time?

How about you admit that you make shit up since you can't cite ANYTHING you say.
 
Gee great point there were a handful of sane right leaning people then.

How many voted FOR the crap?
 
No? Well then what is the problem with Iraq again? (Not that I am defending Iraq, I thought it was dumb, I think military action in Libya is dumb too). So...where are the left's cries for peace like in 2003?

Apparently, you failed to note the announcement by the Arab League and the vote in the UN to authorize a no fly zone and the necessary use of force to implement it. Did Bush have either of those kinds of international authorizations prior to invading Iraq?

Does obama still have the ability to say the word 'no'?

But like was already stated, to the warmongering left, "This is different."
 
Sadam was not bombing his people to death for marching for democracy.


If you are really going to pretend these things are teh same than you are so dishonest you cant be reasoned with.


I suggest you research sadam a bit. Bombs are not the only way to kill your people.

so you are going to be so dishonest as to claim these two incidents are just alike huh?

Gadafi is killing ( shooting, bombing, running air strikes) against his people right now.


Sadams people were better off under him than they were under Bush.

They said so themselves
 
Letting a dictator kill his people at his insane whim is not going to be good for anyone in the world.

If Gadafi is allowed to bomb his own people until only his cronies are left what do you think that says to the rest of the countries on the brink of revolution for democracy?

You people just hate anything this president does no matter what it is.

This is a UN action and not a declared war.

Then you support us going to war in Iraq.

B/c that is exactly what was going on.
 
Letting a dictator kill his people at his insane whim is not going to be good for anyone in the world.

If Gadafi is allowed to bomb his own people until only his cronies are left what do you think that says to the rest of the countries on the brink of revolution for democracy?

You people just hate anything this president does no matter what it is.

This is a UN action and not a declared war.

Then you support us going to war in Iraq.

B/c that is exactly what was going on.

Only in the minds of dishonest cons
 
"Brackets" Obama is not to be criticized. He is the savior of the world and will prove it by bombing Libya. Why else did they give him the Noble Pizza Prize before he was elected?
 
Sadam was not bombing his people to death for marching for democracy.


If you are really going to pretend these things are teh same than you are so dishonest you cant be reasoned with.


I suggest you research sadam a bit. Bombs are not the only way to kill your people.

Bombs tend to kill you quickly. He used poison chemicals. It was so effective, he nick named the Gen that carried it out; "Chemical Alli".
 

Forum List

Back
Top