Newby
Does it get any better?
- Jan 6, 2009
- 9,094
- 1,749
- 190
How is my question somehow anti-christian??Cookie cutter anti-christian post, try again. What's the matter, can't you answer my questions??
Most christians I know say the the Bible is 100% the word of God.
Yet, you said the word of Paul was not from God, but was just the words of a man.
So I am just wondering how you divide the Bible into God's words and man's words?
Is it by the book or by the verse?
Um, you know by the words that were spoken by Jesus, and by the words that were spoken by His apostles in letters that they wrote while communicating to various groups and each other throughout the middle east. Did you just decide to completely ignore the explanation that I gave for Paul's words in my earlier post? Is that too inconvenient for you or make too much sense or something?
Besides, we're off topic. So, you think that because women covered their heads as a part of ancient society, and your holy book references the customs and norms of that ancient society since that's when it was written, that women of today should still cover their hair. So you think the Koran or even the Bible would have called for women to cover their hair had they been written today? Do you think God's salvation is so petty and small that it is concerned over such a trivial thing?