Capitalist or Socialist, Venezuela suffered from inept and corrupt government.
There is nothing about Capitalism that discourages either
Dear rightwinger
The checks against abuse of Government are
DIFFERENT under socialist structure vs. capitalist.
1. With capitalist even if you have corrupt corporations that are private
YOU ARE NOT FORCED TO PATRONIZE THESE PRIVATE ENTITIES.
2. With Govt FORCING taxpayers to PAY FOR PROGRAMS that the GOVT controls,
the taxpayers don't have the same freedom to NOT buy into the services.
This is why Conservatives and Constitutionalists argue to
MINIMALIZE what the people AUTHORIZE GOVT to manage
based on terms we CONSENT to, because it's harder to
correct and change policies that are controlled through CENTRALIZED GOVT.
rightwinger SOCIAL PROGRAMS such as health care
that involve DIVERSE and INDIVIDUAL choices and beliefs
are the WORST to try to "nationalize" through Centralized Govt
because people WANT TO RETAIN control of terms and choices.
You can't have it both ways.
You might imagine that "nationalizing" health care means
"federal govt will ONLY serve as the single payer"
while "the citizens will get to choose whatever they want paid for"
BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT HAPPENS
Because GOVT is required to represent other people and groups
NOT JUST YOU AND PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE AS YOU DO
then the collective pool and the terms of costs and services
is no longer the free choice of all the citizens. The central Govt
CANNOT represent or manage all those individual choices.
So by "socializing" the programs through a central Govt,
the choices GET DICTATED.
THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE.
If choices get "dictated" by a private corporation, you don't
have to pay your money to it as you would with govt.
With Govt once you authorize tax money to go there,
the terms can change or you may not get the terms you
wanted to begin with (as with ACA) and you are
STILL STUCK PAYING because you made it publicly mandated.
Why would you do that?