since the 44-40 lever action sufficed

[prison/con.net]

and since the M4 using good softpoints is provably more effective (animal testing, by quite a visible margin) than the old lead flatpoint 44-40 load, why claim that the 223's power is inadequate? It's an obvious lie. The only "reason" is that you're too cheap to buy some softpoint 223 ammo, and too lazy to reload your own ammo. Why not just admit it?

Ragheads with AK's aren't capable of any longer range hits than the Indians were capable of with their trade muskets. Also, the further away a man is, the less need you have of an instant stop. The 223 softpoint ,at ranges where it no longer expands, still hits plenty hard enough to render the "hittee" no threat to you (at such ranges). Especially since he couldn't reliably hit you BEFORE taking the 223 hit.

 

[WinterBorn]

LMAO!! Running to a new place in hopes no one will challenges your claims?

What a fuckin pussy.

Tell us more about you managing to draw a 1911, work the slide, yell "Freeze" and assume a Weaver stance before a man could move 9 or 10 feet?

Or tell us how an animal is no more likely to move their head than they are to move their chest?

Tell us about how you worked at Jeff Cooper's shooting school?