Silence From The Great Babbler

g5000

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2011
123,644
57,375
2,290
If you hurt Trump's feelings, he will tweet up a storm. Just ask SNL.

Trump can't stop tweeting. His tweeting fetish is pathological. He lies, he makes really weird half sentences that end in bizarre non-words, it's non-stop stream of consciousness gibberish. His tweets betray a barely passing familiarity with grammar and spelling.

"I have the best words." Yeah, like covfefe and unpresidented.

Infantile birds have to be fed predigested goo. They can't handle unprocessed things in their diet. Trump is the great goo puker into the open mouths of his flock. He nourishes them with tiny 140 character excretions.

In amongst all his rantings, Trump has managed to hurl insults at just about every one of our allied nations and their leaders. Incredibly offensive stuff. This is what he raises his little birds on, hatred toward our friends.

And, of course, he spent years attacking our own Presidents and our country. Bush and Obama. The Iraq war.

He never attacked Bill Clinton, though. In fact, he stood up for Clinton during the "bimbo eruptions", and when he did blog about either of the Clintons, it was to say Bill was a great President and Hillary would make a great President.

Of course, once Trump decided to change himself from a long time Democrat to a pseudocon Republican, his tweet assaults against the Clintons were phenomenal.

But there is one county, and one leader, on which Trump has been as silent as the grave when it comes to criticism.

Russia and Putin.

In 2013, Trump tweeted that he was going to Russia and he gushingly hoped that Putin would become his new best friend.

In 2014, Putin invaded Crimea.

Not a single tweet from Trump criticizing this.

Putin also invaded western Ukraine.

Again, dead silence.

Russia then shot down a passenger airliner.

Not a word from Trump. He sure was busy sending out birther tweets, though!

Trump did not mention the invasion of Crimea until just a month or two ago. And then it was to blame Obama!

I shit you not.

Trump NEVER has a bad word to say about Putin or Russia. But he has managed to insult all of our allies.

There's a word for someone who trashes our friends and supports our enemies. You know what that word is.

Last year, Russia attacked our electoral system. Repeatedly. Not just hacking the DNC. They did much more than that. Much more.

And what has Trump tweeted about that?

Nothing.

In fact, Trump does nothing to correct his Chumps' denials about those attacks.

Trump has done nothing to retaliate against Russia for those attacks.

Trump has done nothing to protect us from further attacks by Russia, or to disincentivize Russia from giving their proxies in Iran or North Korea or Syria the means to fuck with our elections.

What Trump has done is fire the guy who was investigating the attacks, and then called our enemy into his office the next day to laugh with them about it.

Collusion?

Yeah, there's collusion all right. With his silence and inaction, Trump consents to Russia's attacks on the US and our allies.
 
Last edited:
If you hurt Trump's feelings, he will tweet up a storm. Just ask SNL.

Trump can't stop tweeting. His tweeting fetish is pathological. He lies, he makes really weird half sentences that end in bizarre non-words, it's non-stop stream of consciousness gibberish. His tweets betray a barely passing familiarity with grammar and spelling.

"I have the best words." Yeah, like covfefe and unpresidented.

Infantile birds have to be fed predigested goo. They can't handle unprocessed things in their diet. Trump is the great goo puker into the open mouths of his flock. He nourishes them with tiny 140 character excretions.

In amongst all his rantings, Trump has managed to hurl insults at just about every one of our allied nations and their leaders. Incredibly offensive stuff. This is what he raises his little birds on, hatred toward our friends.

And, of course, he spent years attacking our own Presidents and our country. Bush and Obama. The Iraq war.

He never attacked Bill Clinton, though. In fact, he stood up for Clinton during the "bimbo eruptions", and when he did blog about either of the Clintons, it was to say Bill was a great President and Hillary would make a great President.

Of course, once Trump decided to change himself from a long time Democrat to a pseudocon Republican, his tweet assaults against the Clintons were phenomenal.

But there is one county, and one leader, on which Trump has been as silent as the grave when it comes to criticism.

Russia and Putin.

In 2013, Trump tweeted that he was going to Russia and he gushingly hoped that Putin would become his new best friend.

In 2014, Putin invaded Crimea.

Not a single tweet from Trump criticizing this.

Putin also invaded western Ukraine.

Again, dead silence.

Russia then shot down a passenger airliner.

Not a word from Trump. He sure was busy sending out birther tweets, though!

Trump did not mention the invasion of Crimea until just a month or two ago. And then it was to blame Obama!

I shit you not.

Trump NEVER has a bad word to say about Putin or Russia. But he has managed to insult all of our allies.

There's a word for someone who trashes our friends and supports our enemies. You know what that word is.

Last year, Russia attacked our electoral system. Repeatedly. Not just hacking the DNC. They did much more than that. Much more.

And what has Trump tweeted about that?

Nothing.

In fact, Trump does nothing to correct his Chumps' denials about those attacks.

Trump has done nothing to retaliate against Russia for those attacks.

Trump has done nothing to protect us from further attacks by Russia, or to disincentivize Russia from giving their proxies in Iran or North Korea or Syria the means to fuck with our elections.

What Trump has done is fire the guy who was investigating the attacks, and then called our enemy into his office the next day to laugh with them about it.

Collusion?

Yeah, there's collusion all right. With his silence and inaction, Trump consents to Russia's attacks on the US and our allies.




LMAO!!!!! Russia invaded Crimea???????????? Oh! Of course! The lamestream media told you that thus it must be true!!!!!


What a stupid fuck you are. The Ukraine was taken over illegally by a coup financed by the E.U central bankers and the NGOs paid for by George Soros. You are such a "knows nothing" sack of shit. LOL!
 
LMAO!!!!! Russia invaded Crimea???????????? Oh! Of course! The lamestream media told you that thus it must be true!!!!!


What a stupid fuck you are. The Ukraine was taken over illegally by a coup financed by the E.U central bankers and the NGOs paid for by George Soros. You are such a "knows nothing" sack of shit. LOL!
Please seek help.
 
LMAO!!!!! Russia invaded Crimea???????????? Oh! Of course! The lamestream media told you that thus it must be true!!!!!


What a stupid fuck you are. The Ukraine was taken over illegally by a coup financed by the E.U central bankers and the NGOs paid for by George Soros. You are such a "knows nothing" sack of shit. LOL!
Please seek help.


I seek the truth and I don't care how ugly it is......you eat up lame stream media lies like it was manna from heaven. You don't have even the slightest clue on what is really going on and you are not worth the effort it would take to explain it to you. I would use too many multi-syllable words and terms that you do not understand.
 
If you hurt Trump's feelings, he will tweet up a storm. Just ask SNL.

Trump can't stop tweeting. His tweeting fetish is pathological. He lies, he makes really weird half sentences that end in bizarre non-words, it's non-stop stream of consciousness gibberish. His tweets betray a barely passing familiarity with grammar and spelling.

"I have the best words." Yeah, like covfefe and unpresidented.

Infantile birds have to be fed predigested goo. They can't handle unprocessed things in their diet. Trump is the great goo puker into the open mouths of his flock. He nourishes them with tiny 140 character excretions.

In amongst all his rantings, Trump has managed to hurl insults at just about every one of our allied nations and their leaders. Incredibly offensive stuff. This is what he raises his little birds on, hatred toward our friends.

And, of course, he spent years attacking our own Presidents and our country. Bush and Obama. The Iraq war.

He never attacked Bill Clinton, though. In fact, he stood up for Clinton during the "bimbo eruptions", and when he did blog about either of the Clintons, it was to say Bill was a great President and Hillary would make a great President.

Of course, once Trump decided to change himself from a long time Democrat to a pseudocon Republican, his tweet assaults against the Clintons were phenomenal.

But there is one county, and one leader, on which Trump has been as silent as the grave when it comes to criticism.

Russia and Putin.

In 2013, Trump tweeted that he was going to Russia and he gushingly hoped that Putin would become his new best friend.

In 2014, Putin invaded Crimea.

Not a single tweet from Trump criticizing this.

Putin also invaded western Ukraine.

Again, dead silence.

Russia then shot down a passenger airliner.

Not a word from Trump. He sure was busy sending out birther tweets, though!

Trump did not mention the invasion of Crimea until just a month or two ago. And then it was to blame Obama!

I shit you not.

Trump NEVER has a bad word to say about Putin or Russia. But he has managed to insult all of our allies.

There's a word for someone who trashes our friends and supports our enemies. You know what that word is.

Last year, Russia attacked our electoral system. Repeatedly. Not just hacking the DNC. They did much more than that. Much more.

And what has Trump tweeted about that?

Nothing.

In fact, Trump does nothing to correct his Chumps' denials about those attacks.

Trump has done nothing to retaliate against Russia for those attacks.

Trump has done nothing to protect us from further attacks by Russia, or to disincentivize Russia from giving their proxies in Iran or North Korea or Syria the means to fuck with our elections.

What Trump has done is fire the guy who was investigating the attacks, and then called our enemy into his office the next day to laugh with them about it.

Collusion?

Yeah, there's collusion all right. With his silence and inaction, Trump consents to Russia's attacks on the US and our allies.

You leftist fuckwits have lost it, totally lost it.
 
upload_2017-6-14_11-4-2.png
 
You tards love pictures and tweets. That's because your single digit IQs can't handle anything more than that. That's why you deny the Russians attacked, and Trump loves for you to deny it.

I am going to post some evidence below. You will, of course, ignore it and continue to pretend the Russians did not attack us.

Because you are a traitor to our country.


Full transcript: Sally Yates and James Clapper testify on Russian election interference




Top-Secret NSA Report Details Russian Hacking Effort Days Before 2016 Election



Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known




https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf

The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29, entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in spring 2016.

Cybersecurity Expert Is Convinced Russia Was Behind DNC Hacking

NPR: Matt Tait is CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a British cybersecurity firm. I asked him why he was skeptical.

TAIT: Well, it just seemed to fantastical to be true. Russia has very good hackers. You know ,this is a government agency. So initially, what I decided, I’m going to prove Crowd Strike wrong.

NPR: They were hired by the Democratic National Committee to look into this.

TAIT: Absolutely. And so I basically went through all of the technical evidence published by them. I looked through the malware signatures they had come up with, and eventually what you start to discover is there’s a very large number of little pieces of information, some of which point to Russia, some of them point to Russia very, very strongly. And eventually, I came to the conclusion that there’s no other reasonable conclusion you can make.

NPR: Why couldn’t it have been any Joe Blow sitting in their bed, as Donald Trump suggested, masquerading as Russian and putting on a good disguise here?

TAIT: So there’s two different hacks that took place. There’s one hack that was of the DNC, and there was a different hack of John Podesta.

NPR: Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

TAIT: Absolutely. And there‘s a series of other smaller hacks of other Democratic members, but those are the two main hacks that took place. And the DNC hack used malware, it hacked into the DNC and placed malware on the DNC network, and we’re able to look at this malware and we’re able to analyze it and see where it talks to, which other companies have been hacked by similar malware, and quite quickly we’re able to see that this is malware that is communicating with servers that also were involved in the hack of the German parliament, the Bundestag. And one of the things that was very interesting is that this is a group we know quite well in the cybersecurity industry. This is a group called APT28. They’re very prolific. They’ve been involved in the hack of NATO organizations. They’ve been involved in the hack of journalists. They’ve been involved in the hack of people investigating the MH-17 airline that was shot down in Ukraine. And so this is a group that is so prolific that it is not really credible that this is an individual group.

NPR: Russia’s really good at this. Wouldn’t they disguise themselves better? Would Russia really want to put so many visible signs out there in the cybersecurity world that it was them and be identified?

TAIT: This wasn’t deliberate. They accidentally did this. And this is one of the problems of when you’re hacking at a really big scale, you look for efficiencies. There’s just not enough members of staff that Russia has in order to be able to hacks on this kind of scale and make sure they never screw up. What happens is that people make small mistakes, which means that when they’ve hacked a person A you might be able to say well that’s the same group, they’ve used the same malware, they’ve used the same control infrastructure as the hacker person B. Once you start to discover that there’s not just the DNC, there’s a thousand other people that have been hacked, all of whom are very narrowly tied to Russian military interests. The hacks of NATO, the hacks of the German parliament, the hacks of journalists reporting on things that Russia is not very happy about being reported on, you start quite quickly to build up this picture where in order for it to be someone else, it really has to be someone who is very prolific, who is doing this full time. There’s nobody else who would be willing to put that sort of cash, that sort of effort, into doing those types of hacks.


NPR: You said something very important there. You’re saying Russia, in your words, screwed up here.

TAIT: Absolutely. And this is normal. It’s actually very common that we see mistakes in malware, we see mistakes in hacking campaigns which allow us to work out who it was that did this.

NPR: Another major cybersecurity firm, Kaspersky Lab, very respected. We should mention Kaspersky is an NPR funder, and we do work with them on our computers. They said that there can be false flags. There can be a lack of reliable metrics. And Americans have gone through a situation with the Iraq War where there was talk of weapons of mass destruction, the intelligence community’s credibility was really called into question after that, but a President took this nation to war based on intelligence. I mean, are you absolutely certain here, or could we find later on down the road that there was some amazing hacker out there who was able to pull this off and make it look like Russia?

TAIT: One of the pieces of evidence that to me is more compelling than any other one is an email that was sent to John Podesta saying, hey we’re from Google, you need to change your password, and they sent him a link to click on. And when clicked on that link it took him to a page that wasn’t Google and asked him to input his password, and that’s how they hacked his account. But the URL shortening service that they used were able to basically look at the user that was logged in and discover all the other URLs they were shortening, and discovered this was not just the hack of John Podesta, it was the hack of a thousand people, and it becomes immediately, once you look at this, incredible to suggest this was a false flag operation. This was someone’s entire intelligence operation that was accidentally exposed due to this one error. So while false flag operations do exist and we have to always be on the lookout for them, the only plausible alternative explanation is that Russian intelligence was hacked. So it’s not credible to suggest this particular hack was a false flag operation.

NPR: It’s impossible that Russia’s intelligence community was hacked?


TAIT: In attribution, nothing is impossible, but this is about as impossible as it comes.

NPR: Matt Tait is founder and CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a cybersecurity firm in Britain. We should also note here Kaspersky Lab, whose doubts about the hack that we cited, has its headquarters in Moscow.







Face the Nation transcript April 2, 2017: Haley, Cornyn, King

DICKERSON: Vladimir Putin said that Russia did not interfere in the U.S. election. Did he lie?

HALEY: Well, I have always said we don’t trust Russia. And I think we’re all aware that Russia was involved in the elections.






You're welcome.
 
Last edited:
The dumb fuck retards think the only "hack" was the DNC emails. They are actually proud of their ignorance of all the other attacks perpetrated by Russia!

moneky_blind.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top