Signs from the TEA Party Protest

Ame®icano;1516646 said:
These photos do not show up for me.

For you here is a special one.

6a00d8341c60bf53ef0120a5bf8e5b970c-500wi

That's a good one, especially when he stated he did not know who these people were and that the White House had no idea that a protest was taking place.
 
Ame®icano;1516646 said:
These photos do not show up for me.

For you here is a special one.

6a00d8341c60bf53ef0120a5bf8e5b970c-500wi

That's a good one, especially when he stated he did not know who these people were and that the White House had no idea that a protest was taking place.




That was a landmark moment. Shows you how totally clueless they are. How can you explain sitting in church 20 years and not seeing or hearing a thing?
 
James Carville Hints at Riots If Obama Loses Election

By P.J. Gladnick

In last night’s post-debate analysis on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360, James Carville proclaimed that Barack Obama will be the slam dunk winner of the election in November. However, he followed up by hinting at riots if Obama were to lose. Here is the transcript of the discussion. First David Gergen keeps bringing up the race factor as an excuse for a possible Obama loss (emphasis mine):

[...]

Okay, stand by for Carville’s suggestion of riots if Obama loses:

CARVILLE: Let me be clear, I said you can call the dogs and light the fire and leave the house. I think it sounds over.

Now let me be clear here, if Obama goes in this race with a 5- point lead and losing this election, the consequences are—bull, man. I mean I don’t think that’s going to happen, but I think David it’s a point to bring up.

But you stop and contemplate this country if Obama goes in and he has a consistent five point lead and loses the election, it would be very, very, very dramatic out there.

“Very, very, very dramatic out there” if Obama loses the election? That sure sounds like Carville is predicting riots.

Dem Hints at Riots if Obama not Elected | Say Anything: North Dakota's Most Popular Political Blog


1. When are "riots" tantamount to large scale revolution.

2. Carville didn't say anything about riots, or revolution.

3. Carville didn't "Call for" anything of the kind to occur, he just offered his opinion that bad things might go down if the appearance of impropriety occurred in the election.

give it up lunatic anybody who does what a demoncwat does is innocent in your book,, nothing will ever change that. but me? I think you are despicable hypocrites
 
Last edited:
Such hyperbole.

Though funny - the President's color didn't even enter my imagination, yet it does yours.


That's because the race card is the only weapon in the liberals arsenal.

And the "Race Card" card is predominant in the Righties' arsenal.

wtf is that? the race card card card?

seems to be the new one youre sporting lately. its really pretty fucking stupid but then thats whats to be expected from you.

i have never yet read anything that you have ever posted that even remotly resembled a logical statement.
 
So, about 70,000 people showed up according to the fire department.

That's pretty damn small.

Especially when 400,000-500,000 people showed up for the NYC RNC convnention, according to the NYPD.
 
give it up lunatic anybody who does what a demoncwat does is innocent in your book,, nothing will ever change that. but me? I think you are despicable hypocrites

It's really sad how every time you get into a debate with someone, you can't prove your point, so you start trying childish, meaningless, insults.
 
That's a good one, especially when he stated he did not know who these people were and that the White House had no idea that a protest was taking place.




That was a landmark moment. Shows you how totally clueless they are. How can you explain sitting in church 20 years and not seeing or hearing a thing?

OR, perhaps it shows that not everyone pays attention to your Right-wing nutjob propaganda outlets.
Personally, I didn't hear anything about this. Guess I should have paid more attention to Ruuuuush Limbaugh.

ROFL.
 
give it up lunatic anybody who does what a demoncwat does is innocent in your book,, nothing will ever change that. but me? I think you are despicable hypocrites

It's really sad how every time you get into a debate with someone, you can't prove your point, so you start trying childish, meaningless, insults.

I did prove my point, the democrats threatened revolution if their man didn't get the nomination. and my insults are never meaningless. I mean every one of them . especially the hypocrite one. the others may be negotiable.
 
give it up lunatic anybody who does what a demoncwat does is innocent in your book,, nothing will ever change that. but me? I think you are despicable hypocrites

It's really sad how every time you get into a debate with someone, you can't prove your point, so you start trying childish, meaningless, insults.

I did prove my point, the democrats threatened revolution if their man didn't get the nomination. and my insults are never meaningless. I mean every one of them . especially the hypocrite one. the others may be negotiable.

And yet, you didn't answer my 3 very pertinent points that would disprove your assertion:

1. When are "riots" tantamount to large scale revolution?

2. Carville didn't say anything about riots, or revolution.

3. Carville didn't "Call for" anything of the kind to occur, he just offered his opinion that bad things might go down if the appearance of impropriety occurred in the election.
 
That's a good one, especially when he stated he did not know who these people were and that the White House had no idea that a protest was taking place.




That was a landmark moment. Shows you how totally clueless they are. How can you explain sitting in church 20 years and not seeing or hearing a thing?

OR, perhaps it shows that not everyone pays attention to your Right-wing nutjob propaganda outlets.
Personally, I didn't hear anything about this. Guess I should have paid more attention to Ruuuuush Limbaugh.

ROFL.

hang on !!! your slippin backwards
 
I guess barry hussein, ugh, just saying that name makes me want to puke!!! That piece of shit is sitting in our white house!!! Not for long!!! The obamaloonies and obamabots can't think for themselves, so i guess we will have to do the thinking and fighting for them!!!! This is our country!!! Not barry hussein's!! Barry h done in one!!! The countdown is on!!!!
 
I guess barry hussein, ugh, just saying that name makes me want to puke!!! That piece of shit is sitting in our white house!!! Not for long!!! The obamaloonies and obamabots can't think for themselves, so i guess we will have to do the thinking and fighting for them!!!! This is our country!!! Not barry hussein's!! Barry h done in one!!! The countdown is on!!!!


Hey Anna, do you ever wonder why you have negative Rep power?

ROFL.
 
Remember boys and girls, the Bush/Hitler references were wrong. However, due to the fact that Obama is a "Socialist", the references are now okay! :eusa_eh:

On a serious note, got to love the doublethink on things like that. Orwell would be so proud.

The Bush Hitler references were correct - as are the Obama Hitler references. Since 1935 we have been marching towards fascism.


.

u r doing it wrong, then.

or u r full of shit


.
 

Forum List

Back
Top