Signs from the TEA Party Protest

Remember boys and girls, the Bush/Hitler references were wrong. However, due to the fact that Obama is a "Socialist", the references are now okay! :eusa_eh:

On a serious note, got to love the doublethink on things like that. Orwell would be so proud.
 
So you're going to shoot those that disagree with you?

And someone on another thread was just patiently explaining to me how these people are the mainstream of the conservative movement. :cuckoo:

And someone on another thread was just patiently explaining to me how these people are the mainstream of the fascist movement.


:eek:

Sounds to me like they were both wrong. These people aren't in any mainstream I've ever seen in real life.
 
Remember boys and girls, the Bush/Hitler references were wrong. However, due to the fact that Obama is a "Socialist", the references are now okay! :eusa_eh:

On a serious note, got to love the doublethink on things like that. Orwell would be so proud.

The Bush Hitler references were correct - as are the Obama Hitler references. Since 1935 we have been marching towards fascism.


.
 
They came unarmed THIS TIME? What's that supposed to mean?

That they are full of shit. Anyone who takes up arms against the constitution will be crushed by the federal Army in short order. This isn't 1861 where the average citizen could match the firepower of the average Infantryman. Add to it that the tea baggers are untrained and mostly out of shape, and their guns are useless tools.

Has anyone on this board ever tired to take a tank out? It's pretty fucking hard. I had to do it for a training exercise with lasers/receptors. It took the tank about 5 minutes to breach my wife/mines and lay waste to my entire platoon.

And that was just a training excercise.
 
They came unarmed THIS TIME? What's that supposed to mean?

That they are full of shit. Anyone who takes up arms against the constitution will be crushed by the federal Army in short order. .

In against the Law to take arms against the ORIGINAL constitution - not against the Welfare/Warfare State Constitution of 1935.


.

Keep telling yourself that, boss.

If you are feeling froggy, than do it and see what happens.

Just don't expect me to be sympathetic to traitors when they get the cold steel.
 
And someone on another thread was just patiently explaining to me how these people are the mainstream of the conservative movement. :cuckoo:

And someone on another thread was just patiently explaining to me how these people are the mainstream of the fascist movement.


:eek:

Sounds to me like they were both wrong. These people aren't in any mainstream I've ever seen in real life.



then you've been bumping into walls, mr. mcgoo
 
That they are full of shit. Anyone who takes up arms against the constitution will be crushed by the federal Army in short order. .

In against the Law to take arms against the ORIGINAL constitution - not against the Welfare/Warfare State Constitution of 1935.


.

Keep telling yourself that, boss.

If you are feeling froggy, than do it and see what happens.

Just don't expect me to be sympathetic to traitors when they get the cold steel.

Sympathetic , you stupid parasite, you will be the one siccing the stormtroopers on the Patriots while singing your battle song:

"Feed Me Seymour".


.
 
Sympathetic , you stupid parasite, you will be the one siccing the stormtroopers on the Patriots while singing your battle song:

"Feed Me Seymour".


.

Damn right. I won't shed a tear as treasonous movements are destroyed.

You err in this regard:

Those that take up arms against their nation are not patriots.

They are scumbags.

Good thing the neo-secessionist are too chickenshit to do a damned thing but piss and moan.

They are as bad as the limousine liberals that said they'd leave the country if Bush won re-election (and never did).
 
Remember boys and girls, the Bush/Hitler references were wrong. However, due to the fact that Obama is a "Socialist", the references are now okay! :eusa_eh:

On a serious note, got to love the doublethink on things like that. Orwell would be so proud.

The Bush Hitler references were correct - as are the Obama Hitler references. Since 1935 we have been marching towards fascism.


.

Oh.

Never mind.

I was under the impression I was conversing with a somewhat rational person.

Have a ball.
 
Remember boys and girls, the Bush/Hitler references were wrong. However, due to the fact that Obama is a "Socialist", the references are now okay! :eusa_eh:

On a serious note, got to love the doublethink on things like that. Orwell would be so proud.

The Bush Hitler references were correct - as are the Obama Hitler references. Since 1935 we have been marching towards fascism.


.

Oh.

Never mind.

I was under the impression I was conversing with a somewhat rational person.

Have a ball.

Oh.

Never mind.

I was under the impression I was conversing with a somewhat rational person.

Have a ball.
 
They came unarmed THIS TIME? What's that supposed to mean?

That they are full of shit. Anyone who takes up arms against the constitution will be crushed by the federal Army in short order. This isn't 1861 where the average citizen could match the firepower of the average Infantryman. Add to it that the tea baggers are untrained and mostly out of shape, and their guns are useless tools.

Has anyone on this board ever tired to take a tank out? It's pretty fucking hard. I had to do it for a training exercise with lasers/receptors. It took the tank about 5 minutes to breach my wife/mines and lay waste to my entire platoon.

And that was just a training excercise.

Never underestimate the power of a resistance movement, especially since the 'federal army' will most likely have members of the resistance movement in their ranks. Let's hope it never comes to this, but if the government stops listening to the citizens you essentially have fascism. When that happens, you can either choose to live with it or fight.
 
Hey man, this is a free country.

These people have every right to protest whatever they want, including whining about having to pay taxes.

What concernes me is the fact that these 50k or so protestors get more media attention than the Half-A-Million anti-war protestors at the RNC in 2004...

...But somehow the media is supposedly "liberal".
 
Use your imagination. First black president + a bunch of angry right wing nutjobs = .....

It's a very scary prospect and I certainly hope the Secret Service does a good job -- but they need to be right 100% of the time... all one of these loons needs to be right is 1 time.
Such hyperbole.

Though funny - the President's color didn't even enter my imagination, yet it does yours.


That's because the race card is the only weapon in the liberals arsenal.

And the "Race Card" card is predominant in the Righties' arsenal.
 
Hey man, this is a free country.

These people have every right to protest whatever they want, including whining about having to pay taxes.

What concernes me is the fact that these 50k or so protestors get more media attention than the Half-A-Million anti-war protestors at the RNC in 2004...

...But somehow the media is supposedly "liberal".

We were well covered. If the Democrats had run somebody electable in 2004, they would have won. (They almost won with John Kerry.) And the Republicans lost control of Congress in the 2006 elections. I'd say our message was received loud and clear.
 
We were well covered. If the Democrats had run somebody electable in 2004, they would have won. (They almost won with John Kerry.) And the Republicans lost control of Congress in the 2006 elections. I'd say our message was received loud and clear.

The RNC protests were covered, that day, and only because there was some baloon/float thing that accidentally caught on fire...

The "Tea Party" Protestors, who number about 1/10th of the people who marched on New York in 2004, have received MUCH more coverage.
 

Forum List

Back
Top