Sickly Job Growth Sets Up Unhappy Choice for Obama

Conservative

Type 40
Jul 1, 2011
17,082
2,054
48
Pennsylvania
numbers cited in this piece are from the BLS, not from a FOX poll, so fuck off if you want to whine about the source...

Sickly Job Growth Sets Up Unhappy Choice for Obama | Fox News

-- U.S. unemployment rate in April including those who have given up looking for work, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The U.S. economy added a sickly 115,000 jobs in April, but as discouraged workers continued to leave the labor force, the benchmark unemployment rate nudged down from 8.2 percent to 8.1 percent.

The more important number, the size of the potential labor force that is not employed, remained at a crushing 14.5 percent. Economists are alarmed not only at the puny jobs number in April but at the fact that the difference between the two figures, 6.4 percent, stands near an all-time high.

In April, about 522,000 Americans left the labor force, making the addition of 115,000 jobs look all the more alarming. In 2011, about 2.7 million Americans left the work force while only 945,000 came in.

There is good news here though: The utter uselessness of the old baseline unemployment rate may have finally been fully exposed. The baseline is a useful indicator in times of growth or recession, but not during periods of stagnation.

Spin it, libtards.
 
And yet I'd bet my little ranch that the O will continue "bragging" about the number of jobs HE has created.

I suspect one reason he seems to have no fear of making this truly bogus claim is that he DOES have experience as a community organizer and he DOES know exactly how politically ignorant much of his base really is - at least in Chgo.
 
And whose fault is that?

Our job creators are just going to wait Obama out:

'64% Of Small Businesses Planning To Wait Out Obama, Will NOT Be Adding New Jobs (12% Say They Will CUT Jobs)'

64% Of Small Businesses Planning To Wait Out Obama, Will NOT Be Adding New Jobs (12% Say They Will CUT Jobs) « Start Thinking Right

No economic recovery until Obama is gone and his nonsensical programs are reversed.

Vote responsibly next time.

IF that is the case, can WE taxpayers have their Bush tax breaks back? That was the deal Boehner and Cantor agreed to, right?
 
And whose fault is that?

Our job creators are just going to wait Obama out:

'64% Of Small Businesses Planning To Wait Out Obama, Will NOT Be Adding New Jobs (12% Say They Will CUT Jobs)'

64% Of Small Businesses Planning To Wait Out Obama, Will NOT Be Adding New Jobs (12% Say They Will CUT Jobs) « Start Thinking Right

No economic recovery until Obama is gone and his nonsensical programs are reversed.

Vote responsibly next time.

IF that is the case, can WE taxpayers have their Bush tax breaks back? That was the deal Boehner and Cantor agreed to, right?

Not at all. Are you a retard?
 
Our job creators are just going to wait Obama out:

'64% Of Small Businesses Planning To Wait Out Obama, Will NOT Be Adding New Jobs (12% Say They Will CUT Jobs)'

64% Of Small Businesses Planning To Wait Out Obama, Will NOT Be Adding New Jobs (12% Say They Will CUT Jobs) « Start Thinking Right

No economic recovery until Obama is gone and his nonsensical programs are reversed.

Vote responsibly next time.

IF that is the case, can WE taxpayers have their Bush tax breaks back? That was the deal Boehner and Cantor agreed to, right?

Not at all. Are you a retard?

Boehner and Cantor held up EVERYTHING in our Government, until Obama agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthi, err, job creators, because they stated this would create jobs. Now, you are saying those same wealthi...umm, job creators have decided to delay adding jobs???
 
IF that is the case, can WE taxpayers have their Bush tax breaks back? That was the deal Boehner and Cantor agreed to, right?

Not at all. Are you a retard?

Boehner and Cantor held up EVERYTHING in our Government, until Obama agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthi, err, job creators, because they stated this would create jobs. Now, you are saying those same wealthi...umm, job creators have decided to delay adding jobs???

Are you saying no jobs have been created since Obama took over said tax cut extension, retard?
 
Not at all. Are you a retard?

Boehner and Cantor held up EVERYTHING in our Government, until Obama agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthi, err, job creators, because they stated this would create jobs. Now, you are saying those same wealthi...umm, job creators have decided to delay adding jobs???

Are you saying no jobs have been created since Obama took over said tax cut extension, retard?

If the tax cuts were SO necessary, why is our unemployment rate still above 8%? And stop deflecting. Your point was that these wealthi, err job creators are purposely not hiring even those the GOP got them their tax breaks????
 
Boehner and Cantor held up EVERYTHING in our Government, until Obama agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthi, err, job creators, because they stated this would create jobs. Now, you are saying those same wealthi...umm, job creators have decided to delay adding jobs???

Are you saying no jobs have been created since Obama took over said tax cut extension, retard?

If the tax cuts were SO necessary, why is our unemployment rate still above 8%? [/B]


Actually, if they used the workforce utilization number used when the Obama regime came to power, our unemployment rate would be 11% right now.
 
Are you saying no jobs have been created since Obama took over said tax cut extension, retard?

If the tax cuts were SO necessary, why is our unemployment rate still above 8%? [/B]


Actually, if they used the workforce utilization number used when the Obama regime came to power, our unemployment rate would be 11% right now.

Aren't we ALL glad those wealthi, err job creators got right to work on creating jobs?
 
If the tax cuts were SO necessary, why is our unemployment rate still above 8%? [/B]


Actually, if they used the workforce utilization number used when the Obama regime came to power, our unemployment rate would be 11% right now.

Aren't we ALL glad those wealthi, err job creators got right to work on creating jobs?

Imagine what would have happened if Obama had his way and punished them even more!
 
Actually, if they used the workforce utilization number used when the Obama regime came to power, our unemployment rate would be 11% right now.

Aren't we ALL glad those wealthi, err job creators got right to work on creating jobs?

Imagine what would have happened if Obama had his way and punished them even more!

Lehman Brothers shed 40,000 jobs AFTER Bush bailed them out. Please explain your logic to me...
 
Aren't we ALL glad those wealthi, err job creators got right to work on creating jobs?

Imagine what would have happened if Obama had his way and punished them even more!

Lehman Brothers shed 40,000 jobs AFTER Bush bailed them out. Please explain your logic to me...

I can totally understand why you would want to put the blame for all that on Bush and pretend democrats didn't have any control whatsoever.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top