No folks, you can't make this stupid shit up, it actually believes what it's spouting.....That's because, it always is...the Jews.I've seen this type of OP before.
It always gets back around to:
DA JOOOOOOOOOS!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No folks, you can't make this stupid shit up, it actually believes what it's spouting.....That's because, it always is...the Jews.I've seen this type of OP before.
It always gets back around to:
DA JOOOOOOOOOS!!
When did the German navy surpass the British navy?Though the Soviet navy did surpass the British navy. And the Soviet air force did surpass the British air force.Yes, but long term Germany was not the undisputed hegemon. Russia served as a counterweight.
Never said Germany was, but under Kaiser Wilhelm II, German policies became expansionist and hegemonistic to the extent that her neighbours became alarmed enough to destroy Bismark's alliance system that had kept the peace in Europe since the 1870's. Kaiser Wilhem's biggest mistake was to start building blue water navy; Britain may have tolerated a Germany dominating mainland Europe, but we would never toleratwe a challenge to our naval supremacy.
Not until after 1945 when the British Empire contracted rapidly, not really relevant to 1914
The British violated neutrality too!Germany attacked our shipping, which at the end of the day that is all that was necessary. Not to respond to such attacks is to forfeit your sovereignty. Respecting U.S. neutrality never seemed to occur to the morons who insisted on dragging us into their wars. Babbling about who we sold stuff to is even more moronic; we can sell whatever we want to whoever we want, too bad if some gimps don't like that.
Instead of name-calling why not show us how intelligent you are by refuting posts #3 and #4.No folks, you can't make this stupid shit up, it actually believes what it's spouting.....That's because, it always is...the Jews.I've seen this type of OP before.
It always gets back around to:
DA JOOOOOOOOOS!!
No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
The Young Turks were awful, but a world dominated by the British and the Soviets was awful too.No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
Russia was pretty far away from US interests.
The Ottomans did the Armenian Genocide. Would them winning had been a good thing for US?
Three words will do it; Interpretive revisionist history.Instead of name-calling why not show us how intelligent you are by refuting posts #3 and #4.No folks, you can't make this stupid shit up, it actually believes what it's spouting.....That's because, it always is...the Jews.I've seen this type of OP before.
It always gets back around to:
DA JOOOOOOOOOS!!
If you can.
The Young Turks were awful, but a world dominated by the British and the Soviets was awful too.No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
Russia was pretty far away from US interests.
The Ottomans did the Armenian Genocide. Would them winning had been a good thing for US?
How would a victorious Germany have threatened the U.S.?The Young Turks were awful, but a world dominated by the British and the Soviets was awful too.No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
Russia was pretty far away from US interests.
The Ottomans did the Armenian Genocide. Would them winning had been a good thing for US?
How was British dominance bad for the US? (the soviets wereN'T dominating shit till after WWII.)
How would a victorious Germany have threatened the U.S.?The Young Turks were awful, but a world dominated by the British and the Soviets was awful too.No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
Russia was pretty far away from US interests.
The Ottomans did the Armenian Genocide. Would them winning had been a good thing for US?
How was British dominance bad for the US? (the soviets wereN'T dominating shit till after WWII.)
Would a Victorious Germany/Austria-Hungarians/Ottomans have been bad for American Interests or made the world a worse place?
Would a much larger German Empire be a problem for the US?
When did the German navy surpass the British navy?Though the Soviet navy did surpass the British navy. And the Soviet air force did surpass the British air force.Yes, but long term Germany was not the undisputed hegemon. Russia served as a counterweight.
Never said Germany was, but under Kaiser Wilhelm II, German policies became expansionist and hegemonistic to the extent that her neighbours became alarmed enough to destroy Bismark's alliance system that had kept the peace in Europe since the 1870's. Kaiser Wilhem's biggest mistake was to start building blue water navy; Britain may have tolerated a Germany dominating mainland Europe, but we would never toleratwe a challenge to our naval supremacy.
Not until after 1945 when the British Empire contracted rapidly, not really relevant to 1914
I'm suggesting that the British should have tolerated German pretensions because Germany balanced mighty Russia.
No we didn't. A blockade, formally declared, is a valid tactic in time of war and is not considered a violation of neutrality. Germany declared such a blockade in 1915, but withdrew it due to US protests. Re-declaring it in 1917, was considered a causus belli by the USA. The German blockade would have severely damaged US trade with Britain and France, major trading partners and both sides knew this.The British violated neutrality too!Germany attacked our shipping, which at the end of the day that is all that was necessary. Not to respond to such attacks is to forfeit your sovereignty. Respecting U.S. neutrality never seemed to occur to the morons who insisted on dragging us into their wars. Babbling about who we sold stuff to is even more moronic; we can sell whatever we want to whoever we want, too bad if some gimps don't like that.
The Blockade and Attempted Starvation of Germany
The Blockade and the sinking of U.S. Merchants ships along with the Zimmerman note gone public ENRAGED the U.S. and considered it an ACT OF WAR............And the rest is history.No we didn't. A blockade, formally declared, is a valid tactic in time of war and is not considered a violation of neutrality. Germany declared such a blockade in 1915, but withdrew it due to US protests. Re-declaring it in 1917, was considered a causus belli by the USA. The German blockade would have severely damaged US trade with Britain and France, major trading partners and both sides knew this.The British violated neutrality too!Germany attacked our shipping, which at the end of the day that is all that was necessary. Not to respond to such attacks is to forfeit your sovereignty. Respecting U.S. neutrality never seemed to occur to the morons who insisted on dragging us into their wars. Babbling about who we sold stuff to is even more moronic; we can sell whatever we want to whoever we want, too bad if some gimps don't like that.
The Blockade and Attempted Starvation of Germany
No we didn't. A blockade, formally declared, is a valid tactic in time of war and is not considered a violation of neutrality. Germany declared such a blockade in 1915, but withdrew it due to US protests. Re-declaring it in 1917, was considered a causus belli by the USA. The German blockade would have severely damaged US trade with Britain and France, major trading partners and both sides knew this.
Germany is in the middle of Europe and surrounded by hostile nations. Why would Germany pick a fight with the U.S.?How would a victorious Germany have threatened the U.S.?The Young Turks were awful, but a world dominated by the British and the Soviets was awful too.No. A victorious Germany would have served as a counterweight to Russia.
Russia was pretty far away from US interests.
The Ottomans did the Armenian Genocide. Would them winning had been a good thing for US?
How was British dominance bad for the US? (the soviets wereN'T dominating shit till after WWII.)
Might not like the US presence in the Philippines, near it's new SE asian colonies, or it might have a problem with the Open Door China policy of the US.
Germany was a feudal state?Both Germany and Russia were still feudal states
Are the rumors true about Vidal?pedophilia havens for homosexual sex tourists like Gore Vidal and others.