Evidently you can't read and comprehend what you readI can read just fine. And right now I’m reading you dodging questions you don’t want to answer
Reading is two steps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Evidently you can't read and comprehend what you readI can read just fine. And right now I’m reading you dodging questions you don’t want to answer
I got it both. I’m reading your dodges and comprehending that you don’t have what it takes to give a straight answer.Evidently you can't read and comprehend what you read
Reading is two steps.
No you don't have the latterI got it both. I’m reading your dodges and comprehending that you don’t have what it takes to give a straight answer.
More like a constitutional challenge to the Old Orange Turds eligibility to be president because of his criminal acts surrounding the Jan 6th count of the valid EC votes from the states.So it's just a political persecution. Got it.
Their is no constitutional obligation for Colorado. Their reasoning is purely politicalMore like a constitutional challenge to the Old Orange Turds eligibility to be president because of his criminal acts surrounding the Jan 6th count of the valid EC votes from the states.
10th Amendment gives them the obligation because the Constitution doesn't give the feds the authority to determine who is on a states ballot, nor does it preclude the states from declaring a particular candidate constitutionally ineligible to hold office.Their is no constitutional obligation for Colorado. Their reasoning is purely political
The 14th amendment was the control created against the states. If a state wants declear a can date ineligible they do have grounds to do that with Biden. But we don't see that with Colorado.10th Amendment gives them the obligation because the Constitution doesn't give the feds the authority to determine who is on a states ballot, nor does it preclude the states from declaring a particular candidate constitutionally ineligible to hold office.
It still is. That is to say Benedict Donald is still ineligible to hold public office no matter what. Allowing him in office without 2/3 approval of both chambers of Congress is unconstitutional according to the 14th Amendment. I fully expect the unethical SC to completely abandon their claim of being literalists however.The 14th amendment was the control created against the states. If a state wants declear a can date ineligible they do have grounds to do that with Biden. But we don't see that with Colorado.
Both chambers didn't declare an insurrectionIt still is. That is to say Benedict Donald is still ineligible to hold public office no matter what. Allowing him in office without 2/3 approval of both chambers of Congress is unconstitutional according to the 14th Amendment. I fully expect the unethical SC to completely abandon their claim of being literalists however.
There is no constitutional requirement that Congress has to do anything like that now is there? The Constitution allows them to vote to absolve him, like I said.Both chambers didn't declare an insurrection
So your opinion is moot
Keep showing your idiocyThere is no constitutional requirement that Congress has to do anything like that now is there? The Constitution allows them to vote to absolve him, like I said.